Busted doing +50kms over speed limit. Any advice?

[oldjones]

I didn't ask for an opinion that would state the obvious. Sure I'd be willing to take a hit like that, but it's a scam if i never use my insurance.

I asked for advice to fight the ticket not advice to own up to it.

And for you to think I'm a danger, you're wrong.
And if I forgot to mention, i know i was nowhere near 117 for sure. So honestly, unless you have a way to help me fight the ticket, keep your mouth shut. I'm one of the safest drivers out there.

You're not safe if you drive a mechanically deficient car, if you don't have insurance, and if you really believe you just 'know better' than a tested, certified radar gun gun, operated by a team of pros trained and paid to get it right in court.

But if you do. I'm sure it would be very amusing to hear how you know for sure yoiur speed was nowhere near 117 without a speedometer. More gut than brain would be my bet.

What I know for sure is you're an uninsured, irresponsible driver who shouldn't have been on the road. Trying to get out of the ticket that's already way less than it should be shows you're still thinking lke a child, not an adult.

If you were "one of the safest drivers out there", you wouldn't have been caught. Suck it up, grow up, try to learn something from this before you kill someone. And stick the rest of us with the cost.

 

[Noir@heart]

You're not safe if you drive a mechanically deficient car, if you don't have insurance, and if you really believe you just 'know better' than a tested, certified radar gun gun, operated by a team of pros trained and paid to get it right in court.

Keep believing that its all about justice and not about promotions and $$ from overtime.

Back From Bedlam

Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 176

Wont mention what area. I'm close with a few cops who are in a pool for nabbing the most over 50 k speeders. The winner gets a pretty hefty payout. If you get caught doing 145 with these guys I assure you it's likely getting bumped to 150.
__________________
On a hot summer night would you offer you're throat to the Wolf with the Red Roses.

OPP Officer Charged For Allegedly Falsifying Traffic Stops

Friday May 29, 2009
CityNews.ca Staff

The OPP have arrested and suspended one of their own, after an officer was accused of laying charges against three different drivers for speeding or violating the new street racing law based on false evidence.

One was accused of exceeding the posted limit, while the other two were alleged to have violated the province's street racing law and had their licences suspended and their cars temporarily seized. The OPP Professional Standards Bureau won't say how they came across the accusations but admits all charges against the trio have since been withdrawn.

Insp. Dave Ross won't say what the motive might have been.

The allegations make other stops Sgt. Dennis Mahoney-Bruer may have been involved with suspect as well and a review of all his past cases is underway. Ross tells CityNews.ca that could keep investigators busy for a while - as many as 200 provincial cases and 50 criminal cases are being given a second look.

The 49-year-old cop has been a member of the force for 12 years and is based in Port Credit. His primary patrol area is the QEW and Highway 403.

The accused has been suspended from duty with pay and will appear in a Brampton court on July 13th. He's charged with three counts of breach of trust and one of obstructing justice.

Commissioner Julian Fantino, often cited as a 'cop's cop,' is disappointed by the outcome but says it's vital the public knows he won't stand for anything untoward in the ranks.

"It was important for the OPP to initiate an immediate investigation and a comprehensive review, with the intent to bolster safeguards, to prevent similar situations in the future," he notes in a statement. "I believe that the public trust is a fundamental cornerstone of the OPP and policing."

If you think you were unfairly stopped by this officer and have a complaint to make, call (905) 278-6131.

 

[all in]

All I can say is good luck I hope you get off or reduced cause anyway you slice it this law is termed racing bylaw when your speeding .It's all for money which just get wasted anyway.I quess 49kms over is good but not 50kms either way it's speeding i just don't think you should be nailed for racing if your not racing someone.

 

[elmufdvr]

lube your ass because eather way your F#ck#d

 

[Moraff]

Keep believing that its all about justice and not about promotions and $$ from overtime.

Of course there will always be bad apples. That's true no matter what activity you look at involving humans. If we're going to stop doing something each time we find someone who is abusing that thing we're not going to have much left.

By and large I believe the majority of cops are honest.

And what overtime? Cops are now scheduled to go to court (at least OPP and Toronto are to the best of my knowledge)

 

[oldjones]

Keep believing that its all about justice and not about promotions and $$ from overtime.

Last I heard JPs still wanted serious evidence from the cop whether or not she was in OT.

pimpin_civic seems to think what he feels in his gut or asshole's more believable than trained professionals, with a calibrated instruments, and experience in presenting tough-to-beat evidence in court. And all still true if the cops were bent, or just out for $$. Point is, the guy hasn't got the mature judgement it takes to drive safely, never mind that he said he hasn't got insurance or an operating speedometer.

Even if he had a rock solid case that the radar was wrong, he still should be hit w/ "Defectrive Vhicle" and "Without Insurance".

 

[Noir@heart]

Of course there will always be bad apples. That's true no matter what activity you look at involving humans. If we're going to stop doing something each time we find someone who is abusing that thing we're not going to have much left.

By and large I believe the majority of cops are honest.

And what overtime? Cops are now scheduled to go to court (at least OPP and Toronto are to the best of my knowledge)

When presented with evidence that just because the LAW spoke it is not always the truth, it is explained that no one is perfect and that all we can do is try to believe in the right thing getting done.

As for overtime you take a look at public records and explain, if not for extra duties (overtime) how an individual making 70k for the year can more than double that by year end.

 

[masterchief]

As for overtime you take a look at public records and explain, if not for extra duties (overtime) how an individual making 70k for the year can more than double that by year end.

It's not all "extra duties", most times it's part of thier duties taking statements or having to stick around if you end up arresting someone close to the end of your shift. Yes, due to court delays, there is overtime paid for an officer's need to be present to testify on thier days off for court proceedings.

Yes, there are pay duty's but those are when the officer is "off duty"

By the way..take a look at the "Golden List" and what you see alot of is Sgt and Detectives more so than regular PC, pulling in over 100 thousand.

Stop using a few "bad apples" to paint all police officers as crooked and corrupt; or by your analogy because of a few scamming B&S'ers...all SP's are liars too.

I mean in the end the OP has admitted to commiting the crimes and even after the arresting officer reduced the charges, is still trying to find a way to get off on all of them.

 

[Noir@heart]

It's not all "extra duties", most times it's part of thier duties taking statements or having to stick around if you end up arresting someone close to the end of your shift. Yes, due to court delays, there is overtime paid for an officer's need to be present to testify on thier days off for court proceedings.

Yes, there are pay duty's but those are when the officer is "off duty"

By the way..take a look at the "Golden List" and what you see alot of is Sgt and Detectives more so than regular PC, pulling in over 100 thousand.

Stop using a few "bad apples" to paint all police officers as crooked and corrupt; or by your analogy because of a few scamming B&S'ers...all SP's are liars too.

I mean in the end the OP has admitted to commiting the crimes and even after the arresting officer reduced the charges, is still trying to find a way to get off on all of them.

You validate my point in reference to the "golden list", i personally do not care if it is only 2 pc's. My point is that just should not be acceptable at this stage. Making more than twice your salary from overtime or pay duty (how many hours in a week can you work and do a competent job?) These are public servants not private sector employees. I bet that when the financial's come out there will be another outcry as to where taxpayers dollars really go.

Just like the OP is human and screwed up, I only pointed out the same on the other spectrum. Should i be under the impression that professionals are above the human factor. We all have our moments, being here you would think that there may be a common ground amongst a few here. What is the difficulty in accepting that.

 

[kissable.marisa]

Well what is the worst that could happen if I attempt to fight it?

Here's how I intend to fight it:
Get a court date, request courtdate change by registered mail, request disclosure and details of the officers notes by mail..etc etc...pester them in every way possible. Lets take for example the officer had no notes of what I did or said, how can they defend themselves as a witness?

What about this radar calibration thing? What are the laws on obtaining records?

I'm not sure if you know this, but when you take your ticket to court, you don't fight the speed that your ticket was reduced to, you fight the original radar reading, this is what I was told by the UC when I was clocked at going 143 in a 100 zone.. but luckily for me .. the cop dropped it to going only 15 over. Which is more than a slap on a wrist for me..so I just paid the $52 fine.

xo

 

[pimpin_civic]

Last I heard JPs still wanted serious evidence from the cop whether or not she was in OT.

pimpin_civic seems to think what he feels in his gut or asshole's more believable than trained professionals, with a calibrated instruments, and experience in presenting tough-to-beat evidence in court. And all still true if the cops were bent, or just out for $$. Point is, the guy hasn't got the mature judgement it takes to drive safely, never mind that he said he hasn't got insurance or an operating speedometer.

Even if he had a rock solid case that the radar was wrong, he still should be hit w/ "Defectrive Vhicle" and "Without Insurance".

Insurance was there, I just had the expired slip. And it was just two weeks ago that it expired.

Strangely enough my insurance wasn't canceled nor did I receive an updated slip.

 

[pimpin_civic]

For that previous ticket, the cop told me that tickets remain on insurance records for 2 years. I thought this was fishy.
In any case, two years are almost up for that last ticket. I'm certain I can prolong this until then.

 

[Moraff]

You validate my point in reference to the "golden list", i personally do not care if it is only 2 pc's. My point is that just should not be acceptable at this stage. Making more than twice your salary from overtime or pay duty (how many hours in a week can you work and do a competent job?) These are public servants not private sector employees. I bet that when the financial's come out there will be another outcry as to where taxpayers dollars really go.

Only amongst those that don't understand how to figure out the bottom line. Yes there are some cops working all the OT their contracts and the law will allow, however when you factor in the cost of benefits it's still cheaper to pay the OT than to hire more cops to eliminate the need for OT (after all the work has to be done by someone)

 

[hunter001]

For that previous ticket, the cop told me that tickets remain on insurance records for 2 years. I thought this was fishy.
In any case, two years are almost up for that last ticket. I'm certain I can prolong this until then.

You misunderstood the officer. The ticket stays on your driver record for 2 years but it is 3 years for insurance...

 

[pimpin_civic]

Oh ok..not too bad..
so if I am to get a drivers abstract after the two years are up...it won't show?

I'll be a bit more cautious on the road..I'm not a perfect driver. I'm defensive though.

 

[oldjones]

Good for you; realizing you've got work to do is the first step in getting it done.

 

[hunter001]

Oh ok..not too bad..
so if I am to get a drivers abstract after the two years are up...it won't show?

On your abstract no. Insurance Companies have a separate system where it will show up 3 years after the infraction date.

 

[Diode]

I'm not sure if you know this, but when you take your ticket to court, you don't fight the speed that your ticket was reduced to, you fight the original radar reading, this is what I was told by the UC when I was clocked at going 143 in a 100 zone.. but luckily for me .. the cop dropped it to going only 15 over. Which is more than a slap on a wrist for me..so I just paid the $52 fine.

xo

You have nice tits....right?

 

[Noir@heart]

http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/article/645979