Breast Implants
- Thread starter Tina_Ballerina
- Start date
I don't even have to read the thread to see what is being said, I already know.
Point being it doesn't matter what everyone else says, do what YOU want to do.
I got implants almost 7yrs ago and I have not had one single problem.
Keep in mind that even if they are gel and you go behind the muscle in certain positions (i.e. where you would be using your chest muscles, and you would be suprised how much you use them) that they WILL feel hard because your muscle is flexing on top of the implant.
If you have enough natural breast tissue to 'cover' the implant (I would say at least a decent A-cup) go over the muscle and keep it at a small c-cup.
Another way to get them to feel softer is to not overfill the sac. Many surgeons overfill the sacs to prevent wrinkling, but it gives a firmer feel at the same time.
It is a tough decision in the first place, just make sure you realize what the outcome is and be ready to deal with problems if they arise.
If you have any questions I'd be more than glad to answer anything I can.
Point being it doesn't matter what everyone else says, do what YOU want to do.
I got implants almost 7yrs ago and I have not had one single problem.
Keep in mind that even if they are gel and you go behind the muscle in certain positions (i.e. where you would be using your chest muscles, and you would be suprised how much you use them) that they WILL feel hard because your muscle is flexing on top of the implant.
If you have enough natural breast tissue to 'cover' the implant (I would say at least a decent A-cup) go over the muscle and keep it at a small c-cup.
Another way to get them to feel softer is to not overfill the sac. Many surgeons overfill the sacs to prevent wrinkling, but it gives a firmer feel at the same time.
It is a tough decision in the first place, just make sure you realize what the outcome is and be ready to deal with problems if they arise.
If you have any questions I'd be more than glad to answer anything I can.
No, how many times do I have to say I am retired?
I know the word retired doesn't mean much around here to some, but in my case it is permanent
I know the word retired doesn't mean much around here to some, but in my case it is permanent
Svend said:
Yes Svend that's the point most are so that means that is not the phony tits that make them different since most do it. There are also a lot of succesful porn stars that have real tits . A lot of the reason for success is who promotes you .
Sasha Jones said:No, how many times do I have to say I am retired?
I know the word retired doesn't mean much around here to some, but in my case it is permanent
Shit...wanna fool around for free?
Sasha Jones said:
Ultimately she will,, like everyone else, do what she wants. The point is though I think it does matter what everyone else says. First of all it is not minor surgery and though you had no problems she could have . Actually if she wants real advice ask several doctors who are not involved in making money from this what they think
I have only seen one similar undectable pair myself. I have run into a few that end up with what looks like baseballs dangling in the end of gym socks. I'd be afraid that the surgery would not work out and I'd sure want to see a lot of photos of the surgeons work.BiggieE said:I've only seen one boob job that looked real......she's a dancer at The Brass Rail....She had to tell me they were fakes....but WOW whatta pair......Most of the time I prefer real over fake, but if you go to the same doc she did......Kool.....
F
feminista
Hey Dick,
What were the political reasons??
I guess the lack of proof that they were dangerous is why DOW is still paying out millions to those who were damaged by their silicone implants.
remember cigarettes - they weren't bad for you either.
What were the political reasons??
I guess the lack of proof that they were dangerous is why DOW is still paying out millions to those who were damaged by their silicone implants.
remember cigarettes - they weren't bad for you either.
This all reminds me of the movie Breastmen with David Schwimmer.
That movie looked at the breast implant industry. Don't know how accurate it is.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0133643/
That movie looked at the breast implant industry. Don't know how accurate it is.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0133643/
Sasha Jones said:
Well then I guess a good f@ck behind the local Dairy Queen is out of the question then
I hope you gals realize that surgery is surgery no matter what the reason. There are associated risks and my word association skills equate airshow with disaster and breast-implants with complications. And Ive never seen implants turn into a baseball dangling in a sock - quite the opposite. More like a D cup bra draped over oranges. You can make out one distinct shape inside another. Not a pretty sight.
WhaWhaWha said:
Well according to you I wasn't very good anyway so I guess you won't be missing out on anything
feminista said:
There was the first big wave of silicone implants in the 70s (?), as depicted in Breast Men. 15-20 years later many of the women who had received implants started to complain of lupus-like symptoms, immune system problems, things like that. It became the standard media-fueled frenzy, leading to the lawsuits and judgement against Dow. The trial featured many tearful women describing how their implants had made their lives hell. It was politically correct to characterize implants as being toxic life-destroyers being pushed by evil robber barons onto victimized women who were made to feel that they were inadequate without them.
The thing was, there was subsequently a very large study of all the women who had received the Dow implants, compared to a very large group of similar women who had not got implants. It was much larger and thorough a study than any that had been done at the time of the trial. What was proven was that the implant group had no more problems of any kind than the non-implant group. It turns out that lupus-like symptoms and immune system problems occur not infrequently in women in their forties, and that the implants had nothing to do with it at all. Too bad for Dow, and anyone who would have wanted silicone implants for the next ten years after.
F
feminista
Please site the study you refer to.
There has not been a large or thorough study done for any extensive length of time.
Most studies that have been done are largely funded or instigated by those who would profit from this product. As a student I helped fill out forms for the class action suit done by Siskind Cromarty in London Ontario. Those settlements are just about to be paid out. Many if not most of those women included in that class action were women in their 20's or early 30's at the time they were adversely affected. Most had experienced severe symptoms long before Dow was sued. That had to be backed up with medical records.
Many of the women had such severe pain in their arms that they couldn't move their arms without painkillers. All the implants leak and they will eventually rupture. The women most effected were those with ruptures. Removal of the implants and silicone usually remedied the most extreme symptoms. Babies breastfed by women with silicone implants show much higher levels of platinum. The long term effects of that are yet to be known.
The new silicone implants are very different from the old ones because of the dangerousness of the former product. That is according to the makers.
Just like tobacco the purveyors of this product will always claim they are safe. It is very difficult to show causation even if co-relational evidense abounds.
Just like tobacco I would imagine it should be up to the individual to choose to endanger themselves by choosing such a product.
Women hate the saline implants because they are too hard. I would have hoped they could have come up with a safer filler by now -or even better, I wish there was no demand. Until such a time it looks like silicone is back and in 10 more years when the ruptures start again we will see a replay.
http://www.ebreastaug.com/fda/breast-implants-choice.htm
There has not been a large or thorough study done for any extensive length of time.
Most studies that have been done are largely funded or instigated by those who would profit from this product. As a student I helped fill out forms for the class action suit done by Siskind Cromarty in London Ontario. Those settlements are just about to be paid out. Many if not most of those women included in that class action were women in their 20's or early 30's at the time they were adversely affected. Most had experienced severe symptoms long before Dow was sued. That had to be backed up with medical records.
Many of the women had such severe pain in their arms that they couldn't move their arms without painkillers. All the implants leak and they will eventually rupture. The women most effected were those with ruptures. Removal of the implants and silicone usually remedied the most extreme symptoms. Babies breastfed by women with silicone implants show much higher levels of platinum. The long term effects of that are yet to be known.
The new silicone implants are very different from the old ones because of the dangerousness of the former product. That is according to the makers.
Just like tobacco the purveyors of this product will always claim they are safe. It is very difficult to show causation even if co-relational evidense abounds.
Just like tobacco I would imagine it should be up to the individual to choose to endanger themselves by choosing such a product.
Women hate the saline implants because they are too hard. I would have hoped they could have come up with a safer filler by now -or even better, I wish there was no demand. Until such a time it looks like silicone is back and in 10 more years when the ruptures start again we will see a replay.
http://www.ebreastaug.com/fda/breast-implants-choice.htm
goodtime
Travelaholic
goodtime
Travelaholic
