Toronto Escorts

Breaking - Wilson-Raybould resigns from Trudeau cabinet in wake of SNC-Lavalin claims

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,447
1,331
113
This here post, is the most hogwash I've read here on terb. If what Trudeau is alleged to do, happened in the united states, there would be a special council investigation, a congress investigation an FBI investigation and the whole media conglomerate would back that! They'd be screaming a constitutional crisis!

And by the way, Trump and all Trump supporters were the ones who DEMANDED Franken step down! Come back to reality bro!

You've won the delusion award. Congratulations.
Rubbish, Trump was brow beating the US Attorney General openly on Twitter and nothing happened. It barely raised an eyebrow
 

WarGames

Banned
Mar 26, 2018
731
0
16
Trudeau promised to have the most open and transparent government but it was just another of his many lies.
This tweet aged well :rolleyes:

 

Knuckle Ball

Well-known member
Oct 15, 2017
6,863
2,869
113
The Liberal have just limited the scope of the investigation. Now why would they do that?
What are the limitations?

If the limitations are reasonable then I’m ok with it. If it’s to prevent, for example, a Ken Starr Whitewater investigation that extends far beyond its original mandate then fine.

That being said, I don’t see how the PM’s office can/should be dictating the terms of the investigation when it is the one being investigated...seems like an obvious Conflict of Interest.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,447
1,331
113
Because they don't want the truth to come out.

Trudeau promised to have the most open and transparent government but it was just another of his many lies.
So how is it not the most open and transparent Fed govt in Canadian history. Can you point to one that was more open and transparent?
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,447
1,331
113
What are the limitations?

If the limitations are reasonable then I’m ok with it. If it’s to prevent, for example, a Ken Starr Whitewater investigation that extends far beyond its original mandate then fine.

That being said, I don’t see how the PM’s office can/should be dictating the terms of the investigation when it is the one being investigated...seems like an obvious Conflict of Interest.
They will meet in camera to discuss the list of witnesses...seems pretty open to me. But they are NOT going to allow the Cons to call any witness they want. Anyone who would agree to that is too dumb to govern.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,852
3,488
113
What are the limitations?

If the limitations are reasonable then I’m ok with it. If it’s to prevent, for example, a Ken Starr Whitewater investigation that extends far beyond its original mandate then fine.

That being said, I don’t see how the PM’s office can/should be dictating the terms of the investigation when it is the one being investigated...seems like an obvious Conflict of Interest.
Not allowing the former AG to testify? Seems pretty big that the one person who can clarify this is being denied a voice.
 

Knuckle Ball

Well-known member
Oct 15, 2017
6,863
2,869
113
They will meet in camera to discuss the list of witnesses...seems pretty open to me. But they are NOT going to allow the Cons to call any witness they want. Anyone who would agree to that is too dumb to govern.
I dunno. Conil just posted another thread about this. I find myself agreeing with the Conservatives and NDP here that the specific allegations of PM interference should be examined. Let them call any witness they like; be transparent. To do otherwise makes it look like they’re hiding something.

PS: They should also waive privilege w JWR in my opinion.
 

Zaibetter

Banned
Mar 27, 2016
4,284
1
0
Is that true? Do you have a link to a reputable news site...(or do you have all non-Alt Right news outlets blocked on your computer?)
I see, you believe only libtard news. Why don't you double check before looking like dumbo...

The Liberals also blocked a motion that called on the prime minister to lift solicitor-client privilege to allow Wilson-Raybould to speak freely about the allegations that have rocked the government.

“That is not an investigation. That is simply going through the motions,” NDP MP Nathan Cullen said after the meeting, charging that the Liberals sought to “batten down the hatches today and not allow any truth to come to light.”
The government has been rocked by a report in the Globe and Mail citing unnamed sources that Trudeau’s officials put pressure Wilson-Raybould to cut a deal with SNC-Lavalin instead of pursuing criminal charges that could prove financially crippling for the Quebec company.

https://www.thestar.com/politics/fe...inquiry-into-the-snc-lavalin-controversy.html
 

Darts

Well-known member
Jan 15, 2017
23,061
11,168
113
Great! The longer the Liberals drag this out the closer we get October 20th.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,447
1,331
113
Not allowing the former AG to testify? Seems pretty big that the one person who can clarify this is being denied a voice.

She has an axe to grind. It appears she violated Cabinet Secrecy which is a big issue in govt. Also the fact she accepted then VA position and then resigned is really a negative mark on her character. She use the VA department just to stab the PM in the back.
 

dickydoem

Area 51 Escapee
Apr 15, 2003
1,179
64
48
Stuck in Lodi again
She has an axe to grind. It appears she violated Cabinet Secrecy which is a big issue in govt. Also the fact she accepted then VA position and then resigned is really a negative mark on her character. She use the VA department just to stab the PM in the back.
Ah yes, character assassination.

Will we hear the "Lock her up!" chant from the Libs next?
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,447
1,331
113
Ah yes, character assassination.

Will we hear the "Lock her up!" chant from the Libs next?
The facts stand for themselves. Why did she accept the VA position if she was not happy with it? Did she object and complain to the PM that she was being pressured or demoted? The fact is, she was probably part of passing the Deferred Prosecution law, so when she did not use it as intended, the PM decided to pick someone who would serve the govt and not her own agenda. Simple, open and shut. Also one of her primary missions was to develop the reconcilliaton and justice framework that was the centerpiece of Trudeaus platform. It was tailor made for her and would have been an incredible legacy and achievement. She was unable to move that forward. Apparently her and the Indian Affairs minister were not getting on. So..once again another reason to replace her. She was set up for success big time.
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
16,433
2,301
113
She has an axe to grind. It appears she violated Cabinet Secrecy which is a big issue in govt. Also the fact she accepted then VA position and then resigned is really a negative mark on her character. She use the VA department just to stab the PM in the back.
Socrates: when the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser.

Everyone of Justin's disasters ( and there have been a lot) have been self-inflicted
He just was not ready & now we know..... he never will be
 

Moviefan-2

Court Jester
Oct 17, 2011
10,489
170
63
The Liberals are now trying to claim Wilson-Raybould may have been shuffled from Justice because she doesn't speak French.

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/pol...aybould-might-have-lost-justice-post-because/

Too funny.

This scandal just keeps snowballing and it ain't going away any time soon.

Whether the PMO behaved incorrectly or not in the discussions about SNC-Lavalin, some of the most lasting damage from this scandal will come from the prime minister's blatant dishonesty and the shocking ineptitude of the prime minister and his office in dealing with the mess.
 
Toronto Escorts