Wow. That came out of left field.I guess me and you have a different opinion of whats lights out.
Do you also see why its hard for me to take you seriously when it comes to radical Islam??
Wow. That came out of left field.I guess me and you have a different opinion of whats lights out.
Do you also see why its hard for me to take you seriously when it comes to radical Islam??
That is what I see as well! Gaviglio not even close, can't find the plate, gets worse each time through the line up. Reid-Foley needs more time in the minors, needs to throw located strikes, could be there someday but not ready yet.Borucki I'll grant you, but Reid and Gaviglio??
What exactly do you see in these two?? Because I see very little myself
Nope, not true. Gaviglio only had one good start in his last 3 games. Against TB.
His other 2 starts sucked badly: http://m.mlb.com/player/543208/sam-gaviglio
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 of Sean Reid-Foley last 3 starts also sucked: http://www.milb.com/player/index.jsp?player_id=656887#/career/R/pitching/2018/ALL
Last night: 4 innings 6 hits 2 ER and 4 walks. Thats an ERA of 4.50! You call that lights out??
His start against CLE was also horrible. 4.2 innings 6 ER and 5 walks.
His start against NYY was good however.
I guess me and you have a different opinion of whats lights out.
Do you also see why its hard for me to take you seriously when it comes to radical Islam??
That is the real problem with the BJ's! Especially Rogers who !It was a business decision.
Think Green Bay packers . They are interested in winning, even though small market winning is their bottom line.That is the real problem with the BJ's! Especially Rogers who !
What happens in the dugout and on the field should be a sporting decision. But that is what happens when a large business corporation -- especially a public corporation with lots of shareholders -- owns the franchise: business first!
Which is why most successful teams are either some rich man's toy, some corporation's vanity team, a small group of owners who just want to have fun or a corporation dedicated to the sports/entertainment industry.
George Steinbrenner was one of the very few who was able to combine the two and prioritize sporting decisions when it came to the Yankees. I have said it before: he knew that the way for a business corporation to make money from a sports franchise was/is to invest and put a winning team on the field/ice/court...
Perry
I believe you are contradicting yourself. As I have said before, they needed to spend some money to keep their team competitive as Steinbrenner would have done as you state above. Not let the team get incrementally worse each year of shapeero's 3 years and NOW tell us we need another 3 years. Rogers has deeeep pockets so as to keep the team competitive and maintain fan interest and still build the farm at the same time. The two are not mutually exclusive.Think Green Bay packers . They are interested in winning, even though small market winning is their bottom line.
Stienbrenner knew it paid to have a contender every year because of massive TV contracts.
Jays made a business decision to cash in for a couple of years on a pretender instead of building a future contender.
Interesting in that he had a run of about 15 years in a row where the Yankees didn't make the post season. A lot of those years they stunk. I believe they finally made the post season in '95 or something.TStienbrenner knew it paid to have a contender every year because of massive TV contracts.
I think they are exclusive for the Jays. You are suggesting free agent market? Jays refuse to sign long term million $ contracts with no guarantee of performance. Other teams will sign those absurd contracts which means no big free agent signings for the Jays.I believe you are contradicting yourself. As I have said before, they needed to spend some money to keep their team competitive as Steinbrenner would have done as you state above. Not let the team get incrementally worse each year of shapeero's 3 years and NOW tell us we need another 3 years. Rogers has deeeep pockets so as to keep the team competitive and maintain fan interest and still build the farm at the same time. The two are not mutually exclusive.
I am not suggesting that they go out and sign multiple big name FAs and create an instant playoff team, but give the fans enough talent to keep their interest. This team was toast by mid-June. The team is taking a bath by going on the cheap. So sign a decent FA or two to give us something to cheer for, keep some asses in the seats and leave the farm system untouched. It doesn't seem so complicated. Especially for a rich owner like Rogers.I think they are exclusive for the Jays. You are suggesting free agent market? Jays refuse to sign long term million $ contracts with no guarantee of performance. Other teams will sign those absurd contracts which means no big free agent signings for the Jays.
The other way to build a winner is farm system which Jays had a great chance to stock a few years ago by dumping all their aging stars but chose to keep the status quo as a pretender because they filled seats, knowing full well they only had a couple of years left out of their vets. It was a hard cold business decision all brought on by the acquisition of Price as that started a wave of fans buying tickets which continued the few years Jays were pretenders .
They thought they could compete this year without FAI am not suggesting that they go out and sign multiple big name FAs and create an instant playoff team, but give the fans enough talent to keep their interest. This team was toast by mid-June. The team is taking a bath by going on the cheap. So sign a decent FA or two to give us something to cheer for, keep some asses in the seats and leave the farm system untouched. It doesn't seem so complicated. Especially for a rich owner like Rogers.
That does not speak well to their ability to judge talent.They thought they could compete this year without FA
Sounds like you're making excuses for him, oagre.
R-F's start last night was marred by awful defence. That wore him down. Made him face the TB lineup more times than he would have to. Cranked his pitch count massively. Tellez fucked up in the first and cost R-F 2 runs. McKinney took an awful route to the ball in the 4th (?) and cost R-F another run. The last fuck-up doesn't count as an error on the scorecard, but it's poor fielding nevertheless. Without those plays, R-F would have pitched a shutout
Phil, the announcers and the offical mlb.com wrap on the game said the same things I did....... Let's just leave it there and move on.Sounds like you're making excuses for him, oagre.
Tell me something else, how can walking 4 guys in 4 innings be "lights out"?? (as you put it)
http://www.milb.com/player/index.jsp?player_id=656887#/career/R/pitching/2018/ALL
Pannone walked 3 guys in a row in the 3rd(?). Under Phil's rules, that's a bad outing - even though Pannone got out of the jam in the end.^^^^ Pannone currently better than R-F or Gaviglio.
I am not suggesting that they go out and sign multiple big name FAs and create an instant playoff team, but give the fans enough talent to keep their interest. This team was toast by mid-June. The team is taking a bath by going on the cheap. So sign a decent FA or two to give us something to cheer for, keep some asses in the seats and leave the farm system untouched. It doesn't seem so complicated. Especially for a rich owner like Rogers.
Under my rules it isn't! He got out of the inning after Walker spoke to him and went 6.2 innings. Who got the win? How far did R-F go on Friday? Who took the loss?Pannone walked 3 guys in a row in the 3rd(?). Under Phil's rules, that's a bad outing - even though Pannone got out of the jam in the end.
Under my rules it isn't! He got out of the inning after Walker spoke to him and went 6.2 innings. Who got the win? How far did R-F go on Friday? Who took the loss?
I think you may have heard that wrong. His fastball hovers around 88-91 MPH
The only note I would add re Pannone is to echo the radio commentators who said that his fastball tops out at 86 mph
Pannone isn’t a hard thrower by any stretch, as he sits at around 88-91 MPH with his fastball, which is likely why he has gone pretty under the radar to this point in his minor league career. The stuff doesn’t blow anyone away, but he has incredible control of his pitches, which helps him navigate up and down an order.
He also features a curveball that he can throw pretty consistently for strikes, which is his second best pitch. His third pitch which he uses significantly less and is still working on is his changeup. If Pannone can develop his changeup further, he could become quite the effective starter once he reaches the MLB





