Bill Clinton is a GOD!!!!

[rogerstaubach]

It was Reagan that walked away from a single terrorist attack on the
Marine barracks in Beruit in 1981. Not a single shot was fired.
Result: suicide terrorism is capable of defeating the US will to fight.
Reagan's failure to respond in kind against Hizbolla was a total
failure in policy. 241 Marines died when Reagan was POTUS.
Even Clinton didn't have that failure. Don't think the Ds are the
only ones with failed policies in the Middle East. Reagan sent
Rumsfeld to placate Saddam in the '80s. He also traded with
Iran. Don't get too righteous. You have no room to brag.

Clinton's feeble responses and do-nothing attitude to:

1) Original WTC attack.
2) Somalia "BlackHawk Down" disaster.
3) American Embassy massacre in Kenya.
4) American Embassy massacre in Tanzania.
5) USS Cole terrorist atrocity.

displayed to AQ the Clinton Admin's naively and morally, weak-kneed response and emboldened AQ to plan and committ the ultimate horror.

 

[blitz]

...displayed to AQ the Clinton Admin's naively and morally, weak-kneed response and emboldened AQ to plan and committ the ultimate horror.

Yet he remains a God, a vision of hope and success, flying in the face of evil that the world sees and seethes today.

 

[rogerstaubach]

Yet he remains a God, a vision of hope and success, flying in the face of evil that the world sees and seethes today.

Are you on your knees ala the thick-ankled frump?

 

[blitz]

Are you on your knees ala the thick-ankled frump?

rogerdodger, bow before your Clinton so that you might be annointed.

May his blessings be upon your face.

 

[rogerstaubach]

rogerdodger, bow before your Clinton so that you might be annointed.

Did you save your blouse as a momento as the thick-ankled frump did?

Oh, oh wait wait......you just go ga-ga for Clinton BBBJTCCIMASing.

 

[Judas H]

May his blessings be upon your face.

or his dress.

 

[rogerstaubach]

Of what current relevance are your postings?

Other than you, who really cares what happened from 1980 to 2000.

1. As for the WTC attacks the perpetrators were captured, tried, convicted
and serving sentences in federal prisons.

2. GHWB was the POTUS that sent American troops into Somalia.
Clinton inherited his decision. If there is a mistake it was how that
involvement was initiated.

3. The Embassy attacks in Kenya and Tanzania were not known about
prior to their execution. As a result, there have been changes in policy.
If Clinton is responsible for those three bombings then GWB is responsible
for the attacks on 9/11. Again, OBL is still a free man.

4. The report from the CIA about the source of the attack on the USS Cole
was completed and presented to GWB. Clinton's administration was not
informed by the CIA. What did GWB do when he got the report. Nothing.

Your just throwing out events without any critical thinking.
I don't understand why you're playing this simplistic game.
What is your purpose. That Clinton wasn't a perfect president.
True. But we've never had a perfect president. So, once again,
what is your purpose.

You're either disturbed or playing some simplistic game.
Either way, you're becoming less and less relevant.

Don

Of what current relevance are you postings about Reagan and US Marines barracks/Lebanon? I would say Clinton's feeble responses and lack of responses disastrously, contributed exponentially more than Reagan did to the perception that "if you bloody America's nose, nothing will happen to you" and that this perception emboldens enemys to plan further actions.

Please DQ, you embarrass yourself by laying blame at Reagan's coffin while kissing Clinton's ass. Reagan did not face AQ as an enemy as Clinton did. And the fact remains that Clinton engaged in feeble responses to AQ terrorist atrocities which only further emboldened AQ. An unaffected by Clinton's feebleness AQ, then planned the ultimate horror.

What is your prurpose DQ? Except to fling blame without any critical thinking or historical perspective.

The AQ terrorist attacks of the mid to late nineties during Clinton's watch had an exponentially greater importance to 9/11 than the Marine barracks bombning of the early eighties. To believe otherwise is to revise history.

Your judgement is sorely lacking DQ.

 

[rogerstaubach]

1. From an historical point Reagan caved in to the Hezbolla in Lebanon
and traded with the Iranians. He sent Rumsfeld to Iraq to garner Saddam's
favor in his war with Iran.

2. From an historical point Clinton expanded US power in Europe by bringing
the former Warsaw Pact countries into NATO thereby strengthening our position
in that Region.

3. From an historical point Clinton attempted to take out OBL several times but
that was in the middle of the impeachment proceedings the Rs brought up.
Had the Rs not pressed for his impeachment he and the congress could have
been working together on the problems in the Middle East. You fail to realize
that the POTUS and the Congress are equally responsible for the safety
of America. Clinton and the leaders in the congress couldn't discuss these
matters because of the shadow of the impeachment.

4. From an historical point Clinton and those in his administration attempted
to inform Bush and his new administration about the threates in the Middle
East but Bush wasn't concerned. His first 9 months in office were directed
toward creating an anti-missile defense and disregarded the report by the CIA
about the attack of the USS Cole as well as getting up to speed on the
Middle East. What I dislike most about Bush is how he disregarded the
wisdom and advice of his Secretary of State, Colin Powell, a truly great
American. Also, his tax breaks to the rich resulting in a federal deficit
where Clinton had essentially eliminated the federal deficits. My children
will be paying off the debt that he unnecessarily created.

From an historical point I am not favoring Clinton over Bush or Reagan. You
continue to play this partisan game and I am getting a bit bored by this subject
and your rhetorical responses. Can't you think outside the box and view the
events with a view of the big picture. To point your finger at Clinton or anyone
else only invites my pointing my finger at you because of your distorted view
of the total situation.

You truly are narrow sighted in your view of the region and world politics.
You're a straw man that I enjoy irritating. Keep it up. I'm having a lot of
fun in twisting your nose and giving you dumb slaps.

From a historical personal introspective you appear to be on your knees in front of Clinton. Gee, and you actually claim to be non-partisan and not favoring Clinton over Reagan.

Read your posts DQ, where you have continually defended Clinton's feebleness and non-responses to direct attacks by AQ on Americans during the run-up to 9/11 and your criticism of Reagan's handling of a non-AQ attack on American marines.

The stupendous lack of logic, willful blindness and apologetic nature that you espouse of Clinton's feebleness exposes the paucity and bankruptcy of your historical perspective.

Yes oh yes DQ, you would want us to believe that Reagan's response to Hezbollah in the early 80's is much more significant than Clinton's feeble repsonses to direct AQ attacks against Americans in the lead-up to 9/11.

Brilliant historical misperception DQ.

 

[Judas H]

From a historical personal introspective you appear to be on your knees in front of Clinton. Gee, and you actually claim to be non-partisan and not favoring Clinton over Reagan.

Read your posts DQ, where you have continually defended Clinton's feebleness and non-responses to direct attacks by AQ on Americans during the run-up to 9/11 and your criticism of Reagan's handling of a non-AQ attack on American marines.

The stupendous lack of logic, willful blindness and apologetic nature that you espouse of Clinton's feebleness exposes the paucity and bankruptcy of your historical perspective.

Yes oh yes DQ, you would want us to believe that Reagan's response to Hezbollah in the early 80's is much more significant than Clinton's feeble repsonses to direct AQ attacks against Americans in the lead-up to 9/11.

Brilliant historical misperception DQ.

Roger did you say that Osama Bin Laden is not a threat? Why are you avoiding this question?

 

[Judas H]

Roger did you say that Osama Bin Laden is not a threat? Why are you avoiding this question?

Can someone please quote the above post for me incase Roger the worm has put me on ignor?

 

[gibsomstreet]

An 8-page-and-counting thread on TERB titled "Bill Clinton is a GOD!!!!". Regardless of the discussion taking place, that's poetically appropriate, somehow...

 

[Judas H]

An 8-page-and-counting thread on TERB titled "Bill Clinton is a GOD!!!!". Regardless of the discussion taking place, that's poetically appropriate, somehow...

Thank you

I posted it to get a reaction from the freaks. I didn't think I'd get this much of a reaction.

 

[Judas H]

Freeks!
From one freek to another, freek off.

I was talking about the other freaks...You know, the George Bush is never wrong freaks.

 

[Judas H]

BUMP

I just thought it was time we reminded ourselves that...

BILL CLINTON IS A GOD!!!!!

 

[Fritz96]

He only looks that way because (mostly through good fortune) he was President during a time of peace and prosperity and because Bush is a disaster.

 

[wollensak]

Bs

I'm not sure who made the 1st declaration but I'm sure it was the US that did the 1st military action against Germany and Italy.

Umm. Canada and the entire British Commonwealth entered the war against Germany in September 1939. The USA did not declare war on Germany until
December 1941. Canada's navy and airforce were active participants in the "Battle of the Atlantic" , as well Canadian airforce units were involved in the bombing of Germany before the US entered the war. Also on D-DAY invasion in 1945 Canadian and British troops were there, commanded by their own officers. Canadians fought the Japanese invasion of Hong Kong before the US joined the war.

I'd say your facts are completely wrong.

 

[Judas H]

Italy then Germany declared war against the US on 12/11/41.
We responded in kind. It wasn't those 'Shock and Awe' campaignes
either.

Does anyone remember when wars were fought because they were the right thing to do. Like WWI and WWII?

Americans now fight wars because they can.

It's a shame really.

 

[WoodPeckr]

Does anyone remember when wars were fought because they were the right thing to do. Like WWI and WWII?

Americans now fight wars because they can.

It's a shame really.

That statement is not fair to all Americans.
A more accurate statement is ......

Neocon Republicans start wars because they can!

Neocon Republicans give all Americans a bad name.

Neocon Republicans do indeed make Bill Clinton look like a God.

 

[Judas H]

That statement is not fair to all Americans.

The majority of Americans voted for President Bush in the last election. So it is a fair statement.

 

[langeweile]

The majority of Americans voted for President Bush in the last election. So it is a fair statement.

Nice to have a comedian here...man stop it...stop it...you cracking me up.....