The only point on which Ms. Carroll did not prevail was whether she had proved that Mr. Trump had “raped” her within the narrow, technical meaning of a particular section of the New York Penile LawWhile I don't take the (re-)reporting of an ad-rag spam page called "Business Insider" (or the Xitter shit) as gospel I did take the time to read Judge Kaplan's MEMORANDUM OPINION DENYING DEFENDANT’S RULE 59 MOTION.
And I stand corrected and enjoy that doing so further reinforces my personal feeling that Trump is an even more clearly dispicable POS sexual predator and does meet the definition of an adjudicated and common definition of a "rapist" .
From his opinion :
"The jury’s unanimous verdict in Carroll II was almost entirely in favor of Ms. Carroll. The only point on which Ms. Carroll did not prevail was whether she had proved that Mr. Trump had “raped” her within the narrow, technical meaning of a particular section of the New York Penal Law – a section that provides that the label “rape” as used in criminal prosecutions in New York applies only to vaginal penetration by a penis. Forcible, unconsented-to penetration of the vagina or of other bodily orifices by fingers, other body parts, or other articles or materials is not called “rape” under the New York Penal Law. It instead is labeled “sexual abuse.”1
As is shown in the following notes, the definition of rape in the New York Penal Law is far narrower than the meaning of “rape” in common modern parlance, its definition in some dictionaries,2 in some federal and state criminal statutes,3 and elsewhere.4 The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was “raped” within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does
not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump “raped” her as many people commonly understand the word “rape.” Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.
So why does this matter? It matters because Mr. Trump now contends that the jury’s
$2 million compensatory damages award for Ms. Carroll’s sexual assault claim was excessive because the jury concluded that he had not “raped” Ms. Carroll.5 Its verdict, he says, could have been based upon no more than “groping of [Ms. Carroll’s] breasts through clothing or similar conduct, which is a far cry from rape.”6 And while Mr. Trump is right that a $2 million award for such groping alone could well be regarded as excessive, that undermines rather than supports his argument. His argument is entirely unpersuasive.
This jury did not award Ms. Carroll more than $2 million for groping her breasts through her clothing, wrongful as that might have been. There was no evidence at all of such behavior. Instead, the proof convincingly established, and the jury implicitly found, that Mr. Trump deliberately and forcibly penetrated Ms. Carroll’s vagina with his fingers, causing immediate pain and long lasting emotional and psychological harm. Mr. Trump’s argument therefore ignores the bulk of the evidence at trial, misinterprets the jury’s verdict, and mistakenly focuses on the New York Penal Law definition of “rape” to the exclusion of the meaning of that word as it often is used in everyday life and of the evidence of what actually occurred between Ms. Carroll and Mr. Trump.
Biden vs Trump debate June 27
- Thread starter Indiana
- Start date
The only point on which Ms. Carroll did not prevail was whether she had proved that Mr. Trump had “raped” her within the narrow, technical meaning of a particular section of the New York Penile Law
Ah, you are awake this morning. I just left it there, I didn't comment on if it was real, did I, Sherlock Legs?You forgot to photoshop Epstein's legs
The Statute of Limitations in the District of Columbia had been far exceeded. Reade's allegation involved an incident in 1993. Jean Carroll's case pertained to an incident recounted from 1995/1996 (exact date/year unknown).
Of course, Carroll revealed to the public her sexual assault in a 2019 book titled "What Do We Need Men For? A Modest Proposal". Click through below if interested in buying. I receive no commissions on your purchase.
https://www.amazon.com/What-Do-We-Need-Men/dp/1250215439
Last edited:
Miranda Devine: “You don’t get to ask Joey a question if it’s a question he doesn’t want to answer.” So now we wait for the edited version of the George Stephanopoulos interview with Joey. You know Joey has the questions in advance because there is no way George won’t do whatever it takes to make Joey look sane, sound and sharp. Dems cheat at everything.
Maybe rump should be put behind bars based on the Penile Code.
Time to look at those Epstein logs too.
My own penile code says 'no means no', don't stick it anywhere without consent.
What about this one Phil, what do you think Smartypants?Nah, you missed it cause you're not sharp enough
x.com
x.com
Look at it...Another fake AI generated pic...lol... The TDS is real!
What do I think?? I think you're not very smart.
Hey, you asked
Pic is also fake: https://apnews.com/ap-fact-check/im...girl-is-fake-00000188e8ebdc10ad9bf8eb72850000
Mr. Squeezer is on a real failure roll here lately...What do I think?? I think you're not very smart.
Hey, you asked
Pic is also fake: https://apnews.com/ap-fact-check/im...girl-is-fake-00000188e8ebdc10ad9bf8eb72850000
There is a desperation not just here, but across social media to try to change the channel. Notice how Trump is laying a bit low now. Very smart. He is letting the pressure build. Letting the Democrats do his work for him.
This Fridays interview is going to be a non starter. People can smell the cover up. And with any luck a bit of unedited footage will leak to blow the whole thing.
Desperation?
Nah, its great news.
Biden will be gone and anyone the dems pick won't have the baggage and can just deal with the corrupt moron.
You guys are putting your condoms on before the date even starts. Long time to go and Biden will most likely mop up the floor with Trump at the next debate like he did in 2020
If she had the balls to make false rape accusations against the most powerful man in the world then she has much bigger balls than Trump
Just 90 minutes, unscripted. That's all it would take. What makes you think if he failed then, and is afraid of failure now, that he will even make it yo September?
Does he talk to his campaign manager on a phone through 3" of bullet proof glass ?
He won on answering the questions and talking points. He failed on public support that he is not too old. His facial expressions were embarrassing. Trump won on composure but that isn't suppose to be what a debate is about Trump has no substance to anything he says. He's an old fart in the wind
#BREAKING: Joe Biden told Democrat Governors last night that he will stop scheduling events after 8pm so that he can “get more sleep,” according to CNN. You’ve GOT to be kidding me. Biden’s days don’t even START until 11:30am much of the time. THIS is what the democrats think a President should be like?
At least he is not charging the federal millions (on his own property) for security because he plays golf 185 days per year...
