This is a story about Hamas firing at Israel from UNRWA compounds. Hilarious. Thanks for proving your terror buddies are terrorists!
http://www.thenational.ae/world/mid...-israeli-soldiers-describe-gaza-war-brutality
It's dishonest of you to link multiple articles which are all really just links to one source, to pretend that there's more than one source. I will ignore all the duplicate links and respond when you finally quote the actual source.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/israel...ack-civilians-because-they-deserve-it/5394525
Global Research is not a credible source.
http://www.unicef.org/oPt/UNICEF_oPt_PSS_Rapid_Assessment_2012.pdf
This contains no allegation that civilians were targeted.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/29/israel-gaza-infrastructure-blackouts-idf-civilian
This contains no allegation that civilians were targeted.
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2014/08/proof-israel-targeting-civilians-gaza.html
This alleges that civilians were targeted but only on the basis that some died, with no evidence whatsoever that they were actually targeted.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/israeli-attacks-led-to-civilian-deaths-in-gaza-report-says-1430163324
This contains no allegation that civilians were targeted.
http://www.breakingthesilence.org.il/protective-edge
This complains about open rules of engagement that the US, Israel, Britain, Canada, etc., all use in areas that have been cleared of civilians, and in fact although the link is designed to malign Israel, it confirms once again that Israel warns civilians away from conflict areas in order to minimize casualties. Many of the soldiers are quoted totally out of context in the report, which ultimately contains no actual allegation of targeting civilians.
That's about 5 minutes of googling.
That's just dishonest. You didn't even bother to read the articles, you typed in some google search and then pasted the links without even reading them. Your first link was about Hamas targeting Israel, proving you didn't even read this stuff.
You really are a pathetic clown. In future do not spew links you have not read, particularly when you are so ignorant about the subject matter, and so utterly filled with hate. You obviously just assumed those articles would say what you believe, didn't bother reading them, and it turns out they don't say what you believe. Most of them don't even contain allegations of targeting civilians, and most of the ones that do contain no evidence. The only one that is really news is the one I responded to in detail, which we had already discussed on another thread.
You really are pretty fucking pathetic if you think spewing a bunch of links you didn't even bother to read counts as "debating".