AhhhhActually, it's Dustin P-E-D-R-O-I-A.
Hoist on my petard
I hate it when that happens
AhhhhActually, it's Dustin P-E-D-R-O-I-A.
your two cents worth is overvaluedCareful there, mur11, you might be opening up a Padora's Box criticizing LashLarue's spelling.![]()
I guess we will never know as he goes on the DLSo you are saying that a baseball player with a cast on his hand for a broken thumb can can hit just fine if he wills himself to. Is that correct?
You negated your own statement. It is your opinion about Pedroia.Pedroia is a perfect example of a tough baseball player who excels at hardball, but would not be able to withstand the physical demands of the other sports.
boil down to someone's opinion of what defines softness or toughness, many of which are pretty lame
Just saw this. So your answer is no. He could not bat. He is not on the DL because he is soft. It is because he can not perform the functions required of him.I guess we will never know as he goes on the DL
Game set and match ???Just saw this. So your answer is no. He could not bat. He is not on the DL because he is soft. It is because he can not perform the functions required of him.
An NFL lineman can and does play with broken digits. Thank you for finally agreeing with my point, that similar injuries in different sports have differing degrees of impact regardless of toughness/softness. Finally.
BTW, that was a really lame answer. You tried to duck because you know you were cornered. Game, set and match. (Yes, tennis is an actual sport--another one of your statements that I put to rest.)
That was your statement and I have neither agreed with or refuted this statement, thus far."that similar injuries in different sports have differing degrees of impact regardless of toughness/softness"
Everybody can see you are avoiding anwsering a simple question. Whether or not he is on the DL, do you think he could physically swing the bat properly?JohnLarue;4726521Since the soft baseball player is on the DL said:[/U]we will never know as the delicate thing is not in the game
Actually, you've proven nothing except repeatedly saying they are soft and they could not play in the other leagues. You've provided no proof aside from it being your opinion.I suspect you grow tired and frustrated of having your idols proven soft
I stand corrected. It was demien. ApologiesAs long as we are checking facts, please specify the post # where I mentioned tennis at all?
I will save you the effort, you are confusing me with someone else
Again, all you are giving, is your opinion. You've given no proof. We've given examples of players being proficient over long periods of time in multiple sports. What examples have you given that discredit this. None, except to say they don't count.Baseball is a wonderful game to watch and I thoroughly enjoyed this years playoffs
The ball players are unique in having a skill set of, speed, power, quick reactions and the ability to play the cat and mouse game between picture and hitter
There are a huge number of other complementary adjectives which can be used to describe they guys (ask Joe Buck and you get a list of hundreds), but relative to the NBA, NHL and NFL (and a number of other sports), baseball players are a lot closer to Charmin, than sandpaper
I hope you're not suggesting that Cricket players are soft. In a Test match, they can play for five consecutive days, seven hours per day. Among fielders, only the wicket keeper can wear gloves. In baseball, the batter charges the mound and incites a bench clearing brawl if a pitcher throws a ball near his head. In cricket, the bowler can only hit the batsmen in the head once every six deliveries, or the batting side gets a penalty run, and the bowler has to make an extra delivery.Cricket? Badminton? Tennis?
Not in the least.I hope you're not suggesting that Cricket players are soft. In a Test match, they can play for five consecutive days, seven hours per day. Among fielders, only the wicket keeper can wear gloves. In baseball, the batter charges the mound and incites a bench clearing brawl if a pitcher throws a ball near his head. In cricket, the bowler can only hit the batsmen in the head once every six deliveries, or the batting side gets a penalty run, and the bowler has to make an extra delivery.
:deadhorse:Heard on TV to-day that chess is considered a sport.
Question: Are chess players soft? Can a chess player still perform if he or she has a blister on their movement hand?
If he is tough enough, yesWhether or not he is on the DL, do you think he could physically swing the bat properly?
That is sufficient in and of its selfActually, you've proven nothing except repeatedly saying they are soft and they could not play in the other leagues. You've provided no proof aside from it being your opinion.
These are one offsAgain, all you are giving, is your opinion. You've given no proof. We've given examples of players being proficient over long periods of time in multiple sports. What examples have you given that discredit this. None, except to say they don't count.
I was away for a little whileI've demonstrated reasons why baseball players sit out with certain injuries that football players can play through, that have nothing to do with toughness. You cannot counter that except to say I am wrong or that you haven't commented on it yet. I'd like to hear your comment, in that case. If you don't comment, my only assumption is that you have nothing valid to counter with. We are debating, and the goal is usually to prove your point. If you had a valid rebuttal, I imagine you'd use it.
sounds good though !Calling one Charmin and the other sandpaper proves nothing.
mmm, you claimed yourself a winner, remember game, set & match?I admit proving either point is very difficult.
Please see aboveI do feel, however, that I've at least provided points with more substance/real life examples etc. than you have. If I've missed those points please refresh my memory.
Ludicrous. If possible, you are even lower on the credibility scale with that one. It's like saying a goalie can play with a blindfold, if he's tough enough.If he is tough enough, yes
Examples have already been given of that being false. Your failure to accept that is your problem.That is sufficient in and of its self
Baseball players are not tough enough to play in the other leagues
Your opinion. Danny Ainge? Deion Sanders?These are one offs
The average baseball player would get broken in two in the other three major league sports
It is neither a good analogue or even good analogy.Try digital next time.sounds good though !
It is a good analogue
In spite of the difficulty, your lack of examples or proof made it easier than expected.mmm, you claimed yourself a winner, remember game, set & match?
now you say it is difficult to prove
Ludicrous. If possible, you are even lower on the credibility scale with that one. It's like saying a goalie can play with a blindfold, if he's tough enough.
No it is not.
Could a baseball player bat blindfolded ?
Could a NFL linesman play blindfolded ?
Could a NBA player dunk blindfolded ?
Could a chess player play chess blindfolded?
You example is just plain silly and foolish as it draws zero parallels to one's ability and desire to play hurt if one is willing to tough it out
Your statement is self-serving and just your opinionExamples have already been given of that being false. Your failure to accept that is your problem.
You should add in Bo Jackson, Jim Thorpe & Michael Jordan (although Jordan did not really make as a baseball player)Your opinion. Danny Ainge? Deion Sanders?
As I pointed out earlier there are a few who can apply their skills in multiple leagues
That does nothing to address the relative toughness scale of the average baseball player.
It would interesting to ask Angie, Sanders , Jackson for their opinion
"are baseball players tough ?"
The would obviously provide a camera ready answer to not offend MBL buddies, however I suspect the private answer is " not even close to football or basketball"
You caught me thereIt is neither a good analogue or even good analogy.Try digital next time.
Examples? WTFIn spite of the difficulty, your lack of examples or proof made it easier than expected.
It is a hypothetical question
If you want scientific proof we will need to have 1000 players from each sport meet in gladiator school in the coliseum, rumble and take statistical data to see which sport gets slaughter more than the others
I suspect after a couple of days the ranks of baseball players still participating would be significant lower, relative to the other sports
Examples?
Until we get a statistically significant number of baseball players attempting to play NHL, NBA or NFL, there will be no examples
Again your statement is self-serving, yet ridiculous at the same time
I'd say chess players are probably tougher than baseball players. LOL!Heard on TV to-day that chess is considered a sport.
Question: Are chess players soft? Can a chess player still perform if he or she has a blister on their movement hand?
rotflmfao!does anyone remember chris brown, the one-time all-star, (san francisco giants, 1986), who was out of baseball by 1989? He was the guy who couldn't play because of a "bruised tooth root". He was cut by the detroit tigers in 1989, shortly after missing a game because he "slept on his eye wrong."
What a pussy. It's only BP so he doesn't even have to run. It's only swinging a bat. How can that be so difficult?TP 'No, I haven't fully healed from my Achilles injury. I don't know if it'd be a good idea to make it worse by doing BP.'
DP 'Is there a baseball player out there that you think could play in the NFL?'
TP 'There are a lot of great 2-sport athletes.
Joe Mauer was a player of the year in football & baseball.
Someone like him could have been just as successful as a quarterback in the NFL.
He made the smart decision because he's got a job right now.'






