Apple takes double-digit PC market share in Canada

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,555
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
Not to shabby to grow when everyone else is contracting....

OTB

Apple takes double-digit PC market share in Canada

By Neil Hughes
Published: 01:20 PM EST

Propelled by the strength of its MacBook lineup, Apple has taken a 10 percent market share of personal computers in Canada, new sales figures show.

"It's certainly been Apple's most impressive quarter, if not ever, certainly going back as far as I can look, and that goes into the '90s," Tim Brunt, senior analyst personal computing and technology with IDC Canada told AppleInsider. "They certainly had a banner quarter up here."

While the rest of the Canadian PC market was sluggish during the second quarter of 2009, Apple, much like in the U.S., is at a record-setting pace. The numbers from IDC Canada, a market data supplier, show that Apple's year-over-year sales grew 24.8 percent from Q2 2008, thanks to the success of portable computer offerings from the Cupertino, Calif., company.

Overall PC sales in Canada were down 14.6 percent year over year, and off 12 percent from Q1 2009. In all, 1.2 million computers were shipped. Brunt explained that Canada has lagged behind the U.S. and the rest of the world as the global recession has finally begun to have its effect on the nation.

"We enterted the recession a lot later than happened in the U.S., so last quarter and this quarter we're just starting to see the effects of it," he said. "We're coming out of it fairly quickly."

The top PC maker in Canada for the quarter was HP, which held the No. 1 position with a 22.1 percent share. However, its total year-over-year impact was down 25.3 percent. Nipping at HP's heels is Dell, which controls 20.7 percent of the market.

Like in the U.S., netbook sales are booming, selling 114,000 units in Q2 in Canada, a growth of over 200 percent year over year. In all, netbooks represented 25 percent of all units shipped. Desktop PCs didn't fare well, though, shrinking 36.8 percent in market share from a year prior.
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
47,044
6,058
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
This is sad really.
Always thought Canadians more frugal with their money and less susceptible to marketing forces, as say you are.
Well this will probably all reverse when Windows 7 comes out in a couple months. Then there will be that nasty surprise many Mac folks get hit with when they see what will have to be done to update to upcoming Snow Leopard....:eek:
 

djk

Active member
Apr 8, 2002
5,953
0
36
the hobby needs more capitalism
WoodPeckr said:
This is sad really.
Always thought Canadians more frugal with their money and less susceptible to marketing forces, as say you are.
Well this will probably all reverse when Windows 7 comes out in a couple months. Then there will be that nasty surprise many Mac folks get hit with when they see what will have to be done to update to upcoming Snow Leopard....:eek:
If the majority of the increase of Apple's market share is due to people buying macs recently. All which are Intel, where's the nasty surprise?

Troll moar kthx.
 

mumford

New member
Apr 11, 2004
100
0
0
What has to be done to update to Snow Leopard? From my understanding:
* those with new Intel Mac's, they just need to purchase it when it comes out
* those with older PowerPC's, purchase a new Mac or stick with Leopard
* those who purchased Mac's since June of 2009, pay for shipping and get an upgrade
* those with a 68000 based Mac, much respect, haven't worked on one in years

How do prepare for their upgrades? I usually do an archive and install. That's just me though. Did it from Panther to Tiger and Tiger to Leopard. Worked like a charm.
 

pjoe43

New member
Nov 12, 2004
347
0
0
From what I read Snow Leopard is a pure 64 bit OS which requires 64 bit architecture. New Intel Macs have this architecture while older Macs don't. So if you have a couple year old Mac you have to buy a new Intel Mac if you want to run Snow Leopard.
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,555
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
Compromised said:
Snow Leopard goes on the MacBook

Leopard stays on the G5
My daughter has a Mac book that she's had for a couple of years that's intel.... I have a Mac Mini that I bought 18 months ago that's intel, I have a Mac Pro that's less than 3 weeks old - I can upgrade all 3 for something like $30

OTB
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
47,044
6,058
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
Lol

You are lucky.
Many other Mac users will not be as fortunate....
 

djk

Active member
Apr 8, 2002
5,953
0
36
the hobby needs more capitalism
pjoe43 said:
From what I read Snow Leopard is a pure 64 bit OS which requires 64 bit architecture. New Intel Macs have this architecture while older Macs don't. So if you have a couple year old Mac you have to buy a new Intel Mac if you want to run Snow Leopard.
Any intel mac will run Snow Leopard.

http://www.apple.com/macosx/specs.html

The switch to Intel is responsible for majority of the Apple's recent growth.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Macsales.svg

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple–Intel_transition
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
47,044
6,058
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
But it sure sucks to be those with no intel mac......:(

Once you use a snappy 64 bit OS you will never go back to 32 bit.
 

Goomer

New member
Nov 22, 2006
203
0
0
There's WoodPeckr once again going on about those Mac users getting the shaft in not being able to upgrade to SL. I have a G5 iMac, and I gotta tell you, I'm not upset in the least about it. I do have a Macbook, so I'll be able to upgrade on it.

The majority of people running non-Intel Macs are running machines 4-5 years old. Let me tell you, most of those will completely understand why Apple made this decision, and won't be feeling like they're getting the shaft either.

And WoodPeckr, it's not the marketing that makes people want to buy Macs (although it doesn't hurt). It's the fact that the OS is the best in the industry, the computers are designed beautifully, the apps are amazing (the iWork and iLife suites are along worth it in getting a Mac), they're far more secure, and everything seamlessly works together. Trust me, when people decide to switch to a Mac, they do so after researching the alternative, and make an educated decision. Unlike the vast majority of Windows purchasers, who do so just out of default, because they don't know any better.

And Windows 7 is going to the saviour? Yes, Vista with some new lipstick and clothing. I'm sure that it will make plenty of people switch back from Macs.....yeah right! lol
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
47,044
6,058
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
As long as it's new & shiny.....

Tangwhich said:
ROTFLMAO!!!!!

To coin a phrase ..... NOW THAT IS FUNNY!.....

No doubt Mac sales will climb again as all them Mac users, who got 'shafted' scurry out to buy a new pricey INTEL Mac because as reported on the Onion (Macbook Wheel), 'They will buy anything shiny and new as long as it's Apple!'...:D
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
47,044
6,058
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net

canucklehead

Active member
Oct 16, 2003
2,423
14
38
WoodPeckr said:
You are lucky.
Many other Mac users will not be as fortunate....
I have been running al the ADC Snow Leopard releases on both the latest and oldest intel hardware .... bugs that i reported were the same across except the bluetooth and wireless issues i discovered which were based on firmware issues.... but the last 4 or 5 builds have been faster and more solid..... when u speak of frugal u do not include the over all cost of ownership.... Windows has been traditionally higher .... this includes support costs as well as software ..... macs do to their lack of malware virus (still no virus has been seen in the wild) and such. Linux and Unix's sit in the same boat just Apple made a very user friendly UI.... where MS made everything there own.
From a techie point of view and for servers i find Linux is rock solid and handles somethings much better then Apple servers.... same as AD in MS world is rock solid .... sorry not much else after that MS..... but on the desktop in a dev environment ... i am sorry Apple is much more solid and will only get better with Snow Leopard.
We have tried them all and the hardware software support out of the box is hands down winner for Apple.... never a driver issue or unsupported RAID card or anything shipped for their operating system. We get people asking us why we decided on Apple in the enterprise ..... it just works that is why.... i can support 200 desktop and laptop users and 300 + xserve - mini running servers in a 24/7 operation with a staff of 6 and a architecture team of 5 ..... i do use ubuntu for somethings and use it on older Apple hardware to squeeze as much juice and power out their life span..... PPC and intel xserves.
Just my two cents ....
 

canucklehead

Active member
Oct 16, 2003
2,423
14
38
WoodPeckr said:
LOL!
This is par for M$!......:D

It's one of the reasons I dumped them and even MORE pricey Apple and went to FREE Linux!

I am now very proud to be M$ & Mac FREE!......

Am very pleased and happy with the snappy performance of 64 bit Linux and it, along with ALL the associated software, didn't cost a penny!
Time is money and the average person would not be able to compile and install easily some things nor compile or write drivers...... so where is the savings for the average consumer.... when a hardware company comes up with an os that fully supports their own hardware as Apple does will we see the truth of overall cost.
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
47,044
6,058
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
LOL!
It's how many corporations get, when they get too big for their britches....:D
 

danibbler

Active member
Feb 2, 2002
2,269
0
36
Toronto
WoodPeckr said:
But it sure sucks to be those with no intel mac......:(
Oh get real...when was the last G5 processor? 3-4 years ago? Given that most people change out their machines within that timeframe the vast majority of Mac users are already on Intel processors.

As for your free software mantra, pray tell, what software do you actually use? I'm really curious about that because aside from Mac OS X itself you really don't need to pay for anything else.
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
47,044
6,058
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
danibbler said:
Oh get real...when was the last G5 processor? 3-4 years ago? Given that most people change out their machines within that timeframe the vast majority of Mac users are already on Intel processors.
LOL!
Wasn't THAT one of the big knocks on M$ by Mac fanboys?
Seem to recall them and even YOU, always laughing, saying Mac will last much much longer than a PC before needing to be replaced. Heck, now you say a Mac should be changed as frequently as a PC???......PLUS it costs you DOUBLE TO TO DO THAT!!!

BTW: I'm still using a 12 years old Gateway PC with no problems, running XP Pro & Ubuntu 9.04!....:cool:
12 yrs ago it came with Windows 95....

danibbler said:
As for your free software mantra, pray tell, what software do you actually use? I'm really curious about that because aside from Mac OS X itself you really don't need to pay for anything else.
In the various Linux repositories there are presently ~7000 FREE apps & programs available for use PLUS the entire OS! When you shop the Apple Store and Best Buy you see racks of pricey Mac software that generally costs much more than M$ software!
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts