Toronto Escorts

Abuse of Iraqi Prisoners

tompeepin

Unbanned (for now) ;)
Mar 17, 2004
846
0
0
limbo
tv-celebs.com
bbking said:
Nothing you have said here is at shows that you are nothing more than a fool.

Anyways this thread is about prisoner abuse - you want to continue to show how dumb your argument is - open a JFK thread.
It is good to know that only your "opinions" are "all knowing" and that to substantiate your arguments you resort to name-calling. Maybe it is because several of your "facts" have already been discredited. I do not know all the "facts" but yes I too like to blurt out my "opinion". Your name-calling is a very good indication of your character for all to see, I need not point it out by using simplistic derogatory aspersions. You are in good company with your "self-professed handsome" buddy. :D Mr. Nuke Iraq! hahaha
 

Goober Mcfly

Retired. -ish
Oct 26, 2001
10,125
11
38
NE
johnnyhandsome said:
Do you know better insults??
And remember, Goober and McFly are already taken
I'd say I just got *zinged*, but, you know, that would be a lie...

:D
 

booboobear

New member
Aug 20, 2003
2,580
0
0
choc said:
..I could be wrong but I think this guy asks the same question whenever any-one even questions our right to bomb Iraq back to the stone age or questions the Patriot act exct. Personally I think it is an idiotic question, you can always make up hypothetical situations to suit your purposes, its called useing fear and its what Bush and his cronies are doing right now.
I think you seem to be missing the point it's not using fear, its trying to show that sometimes in order to get the just results you have to resort to tactics which you normally would not.
Why in your opinion is it an idiotic question , because you don't have an answer . What I think is idiotic is that peole who kidnap or murder people can refuse to tell where their bodies are because they know they can get away with doing so.
Sometimes criminals and terrorists are accorded too many " rights ".
I will agree Bush should never have gone to Iraq, I do think it's about oil.

As far as my hypothetical question however it is quite real , happens all the time that criminals are treated with kid gloves.
BY the way what is your solution to terrorism other than disagreeing with me.
 

choc

Banned
Mar 8, 2004
48
0
0
.."sometimes terrorists and crimninals are accorded too many right", you are obviously a simpleton who cannot see beyond semantics. Was Nelson Mandela a Terrorist or Freedon fighter ? depends on which side you support. You are trying to touch every-ones nerve as if to suggest if we do not support killing Iraqis we dont want to protect our Children. I for one am offended by it. Your pathetic little attempt is better suited for Nurseing homes.
 

choc

Banned
Mar 8, 2004
48
0
0
..and as for my solution , follow what George Washington said, quit dicking around with other countries and maybe they wont hate us so much, simpleton.
 

booboobear

New member
Aug 20, 2003
2,580
0
0
Winston said:
When dealing with monsters, care must be taken not to become a monster yourself. What is the point of fighting monsters, if in the process you become what you despise?

I agree but when dealing with monsters you have to take appropriate action or they will not only repeat their actions
but escalate them. The criminals deserve no more rights than they give.
 

choc

Banned
Mar 8, 2004
48
0
0
"The criminals deserve no more rights than they give",umm ha ?
we are talking about Iraqis fighting in their own country, posts like this show the mindset of some people, they look for any justification to keep the War going, personally IMHO, besides of course the religious Zealots and Bigots the rest are just losers who at least the War distracts them from their own pathetic little lives.Ya if we dont support the War we support Murderers running through our streets, I think some of you need to take the Debate to either Niurseing homes or Grade Schools, there you may have a chance at sounding intelligent.
 

booboobear

New member
Aug 20, 2003
2,580
0
0
choc said:
..and as for my solution , follow what George Washington said, quit dicking around with other countries and maybe they wont hate us so much, simpleton.
You know I have been accused of flaming people and I have said to myself I would avoid personal attacks in the future. I refuse however to listen to a bunch of crap from people like you.
It is you who are a simlpleton my friend and you are naive.

Yes just leave the terrorists alone and MAYBE they won't hate you . I have news for you they still will. And just let criminals decide if they will cooperate or not .
I wonder if the people killed in the towers had any choice as far as their government involvement in other countries, so because the U.S GOVT. is hated these people deserve to have been killed.
In your ignorance you don't understand that terrorists have their own interests in mind , they want to dominate and control their own people. Please don't throw insults if you don't want them returned threefold. I did not insult you originally.
 

The Shake

Winner (with a capital W)
Feb 3, 2004
1,846
0
0
Maryland
www.drivenbyboredom.com
Although I agree with choc on this point:

choc said:
"The criminals deserve no more rights than they give",umm ha ?
we are talking about Iraqis fighting in their own country, posts like this show the mindset of some people, they look for any justification to keep the War going,
You've just got to love it when people who can't even type legible sentences say things like this:

I think some of you need to take the Debate to either Niurseing homes or Grade Schools, there you may have a chance at sounding intelligent.
 

choc

Banned
Mar 8, 2004
48
0
0
..again Semantics, you use the word Terrotists as if you were not talking about human being. You are a Simpleton. I personally more the other group fear/ dislike Religious fanatics, Muslim or Baptist or Catholic or anything else. How is someone fighting against a forieng power in their own country a Terrorist ?. Your arguements are pure babble, your own defintions do not even work. quit looking at dirty pictures on the Net and read some books. I suggest start with Noam Chomsky.
 

tompeepin

Unbanned (for now) ;)
Mar 17, 2004
846
0
0
limbo
tv-celebs.com
choc said:
.... I suggest start with Noam Chomsky.
You actually read books? Reading Chomsky's writings does not seem to have helped your cognitive or rhetorical skills. It is sort of like when people lay claim to Jesus ...

Maybe you should read him more closely, your slurs sound more like the intolerance of fanatics. ;) You make Johnnyboy look docile.
 

choc

Banned
Mar 8, 2004
48
0
0
..I always have to laugh, Bigots always resort to calling you what they are.Again so now reading Noam Chomsky makes me like jesus babahahah, man you talk pure nonsense I hope you are either drunk or really old because you make no sense.
 

tompeepin

Unbanned (for now) ;)
Mar 17, 2004
846
0
0
limbo
tv-celebs.com
choc said:
... Again so now reading Noam Chomsky makes me like jesus ...
The "new" choc deductive logic. :D ROTFLMAO The choc and awe intellect! hehehe
 

Goober Mcfly

Retired. -ish
Oct 26, 2001
10,125
11
38
NE
choc said:
..I always have to laugh, Bigots always resort to calling you what they are.
Didn't you call The Shake a tinkerbell faggot?*


* Cardinal Fang has pointed out to me that there is only one "t" in "faggot". Ah, the irony.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts