He's the biggest investor in Monsanto a company with a sketchy business practice. And who did Musk openly threatened.
A warning from Bernie Sanders to America
- Thread starter nottyboi
- Start date
Exactly. How does a country like the U.S. have a GDP of almost $28 trillion dollars if the wealthy aren't paying into the system.
you seem quite confused about the act of murder
anyone who justifies/ cheers the murder of an innocent business man is a sick, depraved hate filled moron
in the US one is presumed innocent until found guilty in court of law
the fact you do not understand / respect this says it all
and as you stated no laws were broken, no charges were laid.
yet you feel you are able to charge him, judge him and have a nutjob execute him , without examining the details of the issue
no chance to defend himself
...
Stalin / Mao operated this way
based on what you have read on the internet...... hmmm
he was dead
they have a responsibility to their customers, employees and shareholders to replace him.... immediately
any organization that disperses funds has to have a CEO at all times, as he / she authorizes payment, either directly or indirectly
you he disallowed 1/3 of the claims , well the funds need to be dispersed to the other 2/3
you do not think things through do you ?
guilty via biased opinion and media reports
no chance to defend himself
what is wrong with you?
You seem to think that your anecdotal opinions based on your personal standards and bias qualify as as a clinical diagnosis
Someone give Johnny LaRue a Twinkie.
The Musks want a violent anarchist as UK Prime Minister.
The Musks want a violent anarchist as UK Prime Minister.
Could he win the General Election in Canada this year.
Robinson also put out the fake story of Muslim groomers turning young girls into sex slaves...very popular thread.
Robinson also put out the fake story of Muslim groomers turning young girls into sex slaves...very popular thread.
Last edited:
no it is based on the universal accepted rule that murdering another human being is unacceptable and should not be viewed positively or encouraged
Jesus man , did your parents not teach you anything?
You made a CEO who had the highest denial rate of coverage, making 10,000's suffer and even die, an "innocent man". And were flippant about the company having a responsibility to pay "the other 2/3" when they couldn't spare even a day for mourning.
I don't give a shit about them, because they clearly don't give a shit about us.
How many people were killed because that CEO refused their health insurance claims?
A CEO isn't hired to bring compassion to a company as their primary responsibility.
A CEO is responsible to shareholders and to make the company profitable.
Don't like the company?...use someone else. If enough people switch, the company will lose money and need to fix things or go under.
Didn't like the verdict on coverage? Hire a lawyer.
How many of those claims were fraudulent?
How many were denied based on policy/agreements?
Unless you have that info it's unfair to make assumptions that they were ripping people off.
If they were doing something illegal then they should be taken to court.
There will always be a company who has the highest denial rate vs the lowest. Is that your benchmark for who should get murdered?
Murder is never justified...unless you're a "tolerant liberal" and feel the need to attack someone who disagrees with you.
You are making my argument for me. If his job description and the fact he is willing to take on the role is as you say it makes him quite eligible for violence.
National claim denial average is 16% lowest is 7%. They are at 32%. That is clearly criminal behavior.
People can't always switch. In some states there is only one provider. Or it's employer supplied so no choice. The so called exchanges and competition is fake. They carved out territory and match pricing.
Lots of good reasons to kill someone. Hell, you would sitting with knitting at Trudeaus hanging. So stop pearl clutching. He was a sociopath hired to scam people out of money at the worst time in their lives. And the fact, as I've stated, THE COMPANY didn't care about him either, just stepped over the still warm body, and replaced him, is a final fitting last act o show them for what they are.
I'm not making your argument for you because your argument is twisted and mine is sane.
So you are condoning vigilantism?
Where does it stop?
Don't like the service you received at a restaurant? Shoot the maître d'.
Clearly criminal behaviour? Do you have proof of that?
Do you have proof of any state that only has a single provider?
Here ya go. 5 states in fact.
Obamacare Options? In Many Parts of Country, Only One Insurer Will Remain (Published 2016)
Plan failures and the recent decision by some of the largest companies to exit markets are leaving large areas of the country with functional monopolies.
And in this case I consider it to be civil disobedience against a rigged oligarchy run scam authorized by a corrupted government. Judging from the massive support from all political stripes of people, and that there is an excellent chance of jury nullification, vs the panic and completely unnecessary terrorism charges from Elites, I'd say I'm bang on with this take.
you need help from a mental health professional if you believe cold blooded murder is civil disobedienceHere ya go. 5 states in fact.
.Obamacare Options? In Many Parts of Country, Only One Insurer Will Remain (Published 2016)
Plan failures and the recent decision by some of the largest companies to exit markets are leaving large areas of the country with functional monopolies.www.nytimes.com
And in this case I consider it to be civil disobedience against a rigged oligarchy run scam authorized by a corrupted government. Judging from the massive support from all political stripes of people, and that there is an excellent chance of jury nullification, vs the panic and completely unnecessary terrorism charges from Elites, I'd say I'm bang on with this take.
BTW do not shoot the mental health professional when he / she provides a diagnoses you do not like i.e. straight jacket / padded room
and do not shoot the CEO of your benefits provider if they deny coverage for the professional mental health treatment you so desperately need
Id say you are dead wrong and you require a warning label to be presented to anyone doing a business transaction with you
The founding fathers would disagree. Hence the American Revolution and the 2nd Amendment. The core argument for the 2nd is so the populace can defend itself against corrupt government. Taking money and denying service is fraud. Government allowing it to happen is corruption.
Shooting that CEO is by USA definition a patriotic act.
not at all flippant
any organization dispersing millions $ every day has to have a CEO in place all the time.
it will be in the companies by-laws
do not do business with them, then
pay out of pocket for your medical needs
how many fraudulent claims were made ? -organized crime got into this game at one point & lots of doctors have perpetrated insurance fraud
his company could have been burnt by fraud and the actuaries recommended tightening up the claims process
What is the specific coverage offered?
who chose the coverage ? The employer? Are you going to need more bullets?
Have you read the all of the documentation detailing what is covered / not covered before paying the premium ? M guess is less than 1% of the clients full understand their health care coverage when enrolled
what is the industry standard ?
what industry do you work in?
no doubt some loonie will find fault with it & then I guess you are fair game for some civil disobedience
Last edited:
