Who said he wants his party to lose?
He just doesn't want to be the leader who loses.
If you're going to troll with insults at least understand the context...otherwise you just look silly.
Mike Carney to replace Trudeau as Canada’s new PM
- Thread starter stinkynuts
- Start date
He just doesn't want to be the leader who loses.
If you're going to troll with insults at least understand the context...otherwise you just look silly.
Man, if you're worried about wef puppets, I got bad news for you:
Pierre Poilievre
The World Economic Forum is an independent international organization committed to improving the state of the world by engaging business, political, academic and other leaders of society to shape global, regional and industry agendas. Incorporated as a not-for-profit foundation in 1971, and...
web.archive.org
You mean like moving his business to the US like Carney did recently?
You are an easy mark by your Liberal masters.
Yeah...that's a stretch.
Let's see here...the next step in the leftist tactic manual is to compare him to Hitler right? Lol!
More misinformation being spread by Liberal supporters who have Stockholm Syndrome.
Funny how the Liberals are copying Conservative policies like scrapping the carbon tax after defending it and forcing it on us for a decade now that they might lose the election.
Their virtue-signaling ideology takes a back seat real quick doesn't it?
You mean you will support a party whose ideology about the carbon tax has suddenly changed because they fear losing power?
That's funny.
Talk about Stockholm Syndrome! Lol!
The carbon tax was never a point of concern for me.
This was Pierre's talking point.
And your usage of stockholm syndrome is incorrect.
So any candidate from any party that wants to fix their country is automatically compared to Trump?
When is the inevitable Hitler comparison coming?
you know as well as anyone, not a single Canadian has voted for Carney in a general election.
He has to call an election and real soon
yes you are
not at all
Poilievre is dead set against Canada as the 51st state
Poilievre is dead set against tariffs
Poilievre is dead set against stacking the senate and judiciary
we all know where you sit
'"billionaires should not even exists''
Oh wow you found some bs web archive screenshot with his name on the WEF website? And that makes you think he's a WEF puppet despite being vocal about it and forbidding any of his ministers from attending WEF conferences?Man, if you're worried about wef puppets, I got bad news for you:
Pierre Poilievre
The World Economic Forum is an independent international organization committed to improving the state of the world by engaging business, political, academic and other leaders of society to shape global, regional and industry agendas. Incorporated as a not-for-profit foundation in 1971, and...
That's funny.
i am happy to reimburse the rebates, just as soon as i get reimbursed for all the direct and indirect costs to me of these evil carbon taxes.
The carbon tax is a point of concern for most Canadians who have seen affordability become a serious issue over the past 10 years.
Even Liberal MPs started realizing it was a sham and demanded it be dropped leading up to JT's resignation.
So if that wasn't a point of concern for you then what was? Blackface? Costumes? Firing women but claiming to be a feminist?
Why would you trust a party that decided to go against their own ideology just because they want to stay in power?
I mean, this is a moral truth.
$1b, sitting in a savings account, earns you $30 million/year.
I live in pretty lavish circumstances: Multiple properties, multiple cars/bikes/toys, funding kids education, high-level/cost sports, etc. for about $200k/year.
I can not understand what I would do with $30 million/year.
To hoard that much wealth means you blew past the point where you could keep your entire town out of poverty, and decided "yeah, I need more".
When you achieve $1billion net worth (as an individual), you should get a plaque that says "Congratulations, you won capitalism", you should be forced to resign any leadership positions you have, and your tax rate should go to 100%.
I'm even generous enough to index that $1billion number to inflation, so those poor billionaires don't lose spending power over time.
Skipping over the fact that your first part isn't true, and that firing women IS feminist, because they are being treated as equals, Why would you stick to a party that is Ideologically driven, rather than responding to the will of the people.
Lefties want representations, righties want kings.
Didn't surprise me at all, as the Libs were looking for a "non-Trudeau" from outside regular Canadian politics to escape the Justin taint.
I already told you what my concern was.
My concern is the dangerous far right wing turn that I see worldwide.
I will do my part to vote against it.
Policy can be changed or modified once the right people are selected to be in power.
That would be pretty silly to do so.
First off, Trump clearly doesn't want to fix the US, so why would you even start there?
Probably only after he does stuff worth comparing to Hitler.
Which hasn't been the case yet.
Exactly. The Liberal party is far from perfect and I believe you should be critical and hold your elected government officials accountable. Unfortunately the conservative and far right approach has proven to be a danger to democracy
