So Trump won't work for peace at all unless he gets his beak wet is what you are saying?"bribe" nice try...
If let's say zelensky signs the minerals deal... that seems like a good partnership and a motivation for both US and Russia to head for peace for Ukraine...That will probably motivate Russia to not risk getting wiped off the planet.
Private meeting:Starmer can't make up his mind...I thought NATO down to fight for Ukraine with or without US?
because like anything in life, there are no guarantees...what US promised is to bring both russia and ukraine to CONSIDER ending the war... It's costing everyone.... lives and $$$. US finance 70% of NATO... $175B later (from Biden)...the war didn't stop. not even a Trillion $$$ will defeat the Russians...maybe that's the cost plus a few millions of lives to get the war to end... Trump is merely suggesting a short cut... have a partnership with Ukraine (minerals deal) advocate peace with Russia...will Putin consider it? Nobody knows on that side... You've been on terb long enough to know, even a well reviewed SP is not a guaranteed good time...Then why instead of attacking Zelensky on the world stage wouldn't Vance Rubble and Trumputin Flintstone discuss security guarantees?
Valcazar, you've been rather coy on this thread.Are you going to be mad at Putin for rejecting this peace deal?
Don't you want peace at any cost?
because like anything in life, there are no guarantees...what US promised is to bring both russia and ukraine to CONSIDER ending the war...
Trump is merely suggesting a short cut... have a partnership with Ukraine (minerals deal) advocate peace with Russia...will Putin consider it? Nobody knows on that side... You've been on terb long enough to know, even a well reviewed SP is not a guaranteed good time...
So you would rather treat the US as a bottomless purse? Of course Trump wants something in return... You really think Trump will go on his first State of the Nation and tell the Americans..." I gave more of your tax money to Ukraine"So Trump won't work for peace at all unless he gets his beak wet is what you are saying?
The security guarantee is "Trump is making money, and he won't let someone fuck with that"?
That's your argument?
Because "That will probably motivate Russia to not risk getting wiped off the planet" is a security guarantee.
Which I think Trump absolutely insisted it was bad to ask for.
If there was someone who done any negotiations for the last 3 years...they suck at it...LoLLOL, "consider"?
So Trump is saying "there should be negotiations", as if no one had thought of that or done that for three years?
This "win" for Trump is literally "sign this deal and then maybe there should be talks some time"?
Holy shit, even the defence of this thing gets more and more pathetic.
Wow.
I support security guarantees because there is basically no lasting peace that isn't "Russia now controls Ukraine" without one.Valcazar, you've been rather coy on this thread.
I don't remember you stating you support NATO membership or security guarantees.
Perhaps I missed it.
At least you're honest about the corruption.So you would rather treat the US as a bottomless purse? Of course Trump wants something in return... You really think Trump will go on his first State of the Nation and tell the Americans..." I gave more of your tax money to Ukraine"
LoL
I didn't know asking for a minerals deal is corruption...At least you're honest about the corruption.
The history is certainly complicated. There was more support for Russia in the Crimea than the rest of the Ukraine. I believe a great majority of Crimeans speak Russian. A lot of Crimeans also depended on Russian tourism before the war.I belong to a soccer facebook group that has members from over 100 countries, and what you said about Crimeans is not true.
Not according to what they've said
For it to have teeth, it might have to look like quasi-NATO membership.I support security guarantees because there is basically no lasting peace that isn't "Russia now controls Ukraine" without one.
That doesn't have to be NATO membership, of course, and never has had to be.
To summarize, he can't guarantee anything.The minerals deal is what Trump wants in return... He can't guarantee peace until he got both parties to talk...
Does anyone know what this mineral deals would actually look like?I didn't know asking for a minerals deal is corruption...
which leader do you think can guarantee it? EU? LoL they are wanting to fund Ukraine into keeping the conflict... Zelensky a fool? nah..he is smart... he knows once peace is achieved, Election will happen....To summarize, he can't guarantee anything.
He just wants the minerals.
Unfortunately, Zelensky isn't the fool Trump is.
You know damn well they can guarantee military support like military presence, military bases, weapons etc.because like anything in life, there are no guarantees...what US promised is to bring both russia and ukraine to CONSIDER ending the war... It's costing everyone.... lives and $$$. US finance 70% of NATO... $175B later (from Biden)...the war didn't stop. not even a Trillion $$$ will defeat the Russians...maybe that's the cost plus a few millions of lives to get the war to end... Trump is merely suggesting a short cut... have a partnership with Ukraine (minerals deal) advocate peace with Russia...will Putin consider it? Nobody knows on that side... You've been on terb long enough to know, even a well reviewed SP is not a guaranteed good time...
![]()
Security guarantee = military consequences for Russia.which leader do you think can guarantee it? EU? LoL they are wanting to fund Ukraine into keeping the conflict... Zelensky a fool? nah..he is smart... he knows once peace is achieved, Election will happen....
Are you ready to enlist once Trudeau sends troops to Ukraine?
Ukrainian civilians are not...
guaranteeing military support is not towards peace...it's prolonging war. US is bleeding money. Trump is wanting better deal for US for Americans. US is already funding the most in NATO...and no, it's not "Pay me money or something bad will happen to you" that's an ignorant take...You know damn well they can guarantee military support like military presence, military bases, weapons etc.
Trump's mob-style negotiations just don't work. "Pay me money or something bad will happen to you". WTF is this?
So you're saying Russia didn't get "military consequences" under Biden? they were fighting since 2022...It's quite obvious another $200B will not end this war...you really expect Trump to look every American in the eye and say..."we're going to Ukraine and we'll send our troops"? LOLOLOLOL.Security guarantee = military consequences for Russia.
More clearly, if Russia were to attack Ukraine in the future, they would have to fight Ukraine and the west.
That is what Zelensky is asking for.
It is reasonable.
Guarantee here is not referring to promises or assurances by Trump or any other leader.
Without it the only other option is for Ukraine to fight it out.
Unless UKRAINE DECIDES to give up territory and end the war.
But it should be Ukraine's decision.
Not shoved down its throat by Trump or anyone else. Much less frame this as a protection racket.