all senators from both side are inside traders in the US.
sure you areI'm not contradicting myself.
there is no doubt there is wasteI said it's HOW you do it. You've created a false dichotomy that one either believes there is waste or believes there isn't waste.
there is no doubt there is wasteNo one believes its either or.
according to you and you do not have any credibilitySo making up stories of fraud and waste is acceptable to you? Or would you rather get accurate info? I imagine you want real ones. Real fraud and abuse? Musk has pumped out a ton of misinformation about what he's doing or saving.
i really do not care what you tell us, you are a known bullshit artistBut if i tell you the us government is spending billions on training dragons, but that is patently not true, that does not mean you think there is no waste.
Musk put out examples that turn out to be false. Routinely. What about accurate info - I take it you're in favor of accurate information?
like i saidI did not mention the debt. I addressed the myth that the number of govt employees has exploded.
both Obama / Biden tried this & it did not workThere is more than one way to address the deficit/debt. Includes more raising income
cut out the waste firstand making cuts.
what is the matter with you ?economic growth will also change the ratio of debt to gdp.
noSo we don't disagree. We may differ on how to get there
you want to ignore the problemSo making up stories of fraud and waste is acceptable to you? Or would you rather get accurate info? I imagine you want real ones. Real fraud and abuse? Musk has pumped out a ton of misinformation about what he's doing or saving.
I'd take greater pleasure in seeing useless federal employees get canned.He's going to crash and burn big time. I will be smiling and enjoying the moment when he does.
Another proud member of the leopards eat my face party.I'd take greater pleasure in seeing useless federal employees get canned.
Jealousy is an ugly thing. You must have applied for a government job at one point in your life and been turned away.I'd take greater pleasure in seeing useless federal employees get canned.
Because "I disagree with this policy goal" is not actually waste, fraud, and abuse.you are your own worst enemy
if the "findings" have been public for years why were they permitted to persist ?
that is grounds for dismissal
If Musk ever produces any evidence of money laundering, then that would be relevant.All federal employees who have fund disbursement responsibilities will have signed a paper indicating they have fiduciary responsibility to safeguard govt (taxpayer) funds
wilful blindness is not an acceptable excuse under money laundering legislation
But Elon is more important than their boss.To be fair, Elon is not their boss. Nor was this part of the job description.
That is assuming Trump cares about waste and fraud.Trump doesn't understand what these groups and agencies so he takes Elon at face value despite the clear documentable errors. He's likely unaware of the errors.
pretending there is not actually waste, fraud, and abuse is lying and misrepresentationBecause "I disagree with this policy goal" is not actually waste, fraud, and abuse.
Neither are "things which I've lied about and misrepresented".
All federal employees who have fund disbursement responsibilities will have signed a paper indicating they have fiduciary responsibility to safeguard govt (taxpayer) fundsIf Musk ever produces any evidence of money laundering, then that would be relevant.
Of course it is.Is English ..
So making up stories of fraud and waste is acceptable to you?
Why would he want that?Or would you rather get accurate info?
Those would be helpful, but he clearly doesn't consider them necessary.I imagine you want real ones. Real fraud and abuse?
But it is misinformation in service of the true, holy goal of debt reduction.Musk has pumped out a ton of misinformation about what he's doing or saving.
As Wyatt pointed out in the other thread, doing it properly, legally, and with accountability is too slow.I'm not pretending there is no waste. That came from the recesses of your mind, not my words.
In fact, I've outlined other approaches done back in the 90s that phased out 400,000 us government workers in the 1990s. I'm in favor of going after it. But it's how you do it.
The USA has essentially the same number of government employees now as it had since the 80s. Yet the population is up 50% since then.
The opposite. I've worked for the government and I've seen just how inefficient, corrupt, and wasteful it is.Jealousy is an ugly thing. You must have applied for a government job at one point in your life and been turned away.
If the standard is that low, then there is no benefit to asking for those 5 points in the first place.
Nope.I'm not contradicting myself. I said it's HOW you do it. You've created a false dichotomy that one either believes there is waste or believes there isn't waste. No one believes its either or. But if i tell you the us government is spending billions on training dragons, but that is patently not true, that does not mean you think there is no waste.
Assumes facts not in evidence.What about accurate info - I take it you're in favor of accurate information?
Anything other than absolute adherence to the orthodoxy of Larue is proof you are a heretic, an apostate, and must be cleansed from the body politic.There is more than one way to address the deficit/debt. Includes more raising income and making cuts.economic growth will also change the ratio of debt to gdp.
So we don't disagree. We may differ on how to get there.
So you were fired and have an ax to grind.The opposite. I've worked for the government and I've seen just how inefficient, corrupt, and wasteful it is.
But pointing out that Musk has done nothing to find any and is lying about what he is finding is not.pretending there is not actually waste, fraud, and abuse is lying and misrepresentation
This is some kid of fetish for you, isn't it?All federal employees who have fund disbursement responsibilities will have signed a paper indicating they have fiduciary responsibility to safeguard govt (taxpayer) funds
the fact wilful blindness is not an acceptable excuse under money laundering legislation will become apparent soon enough
Of course it is pretextual.So he is asking a question that is inappropriate for the kind of work that a federal agency does and he is using that as a pretext to fire federal employees.