People must "fight" President Trump's agenda "in the streets," he says: https://x.com/RapidResponse47/status/1885351963140739386
Dem Leader Hakeem Jeffries Foments Insurrection, Urges Fighting 'in the Streets'
- Thread starter Lenny59
- Start date
It's a turn of speech. Not literal. Yet.
Give it a few more months before the shooting and bombs start.
Give it a few more months before the shooting and bombs start.
The only one who called for actual violence was on January 6th!!
Wow, the hypocrisy in the left is mind boggling. Is anyone still questioning why Trump won?
If actual fighting does break out it will happen when snowflake MAGA cultists attack people for daring to criticize the supreme leader.
Fight like hell, or you won't have a country anymore.
Don't you know? It's one of those MAGA selective cases where he didn't really mean what he said.
That may be another trait of of trump Devotee Syndrome, tDS. Only someone with tDS knows when to take him literally and when not to. Normal non-cultist people don't have that ability. The only catch is that they can only make that differentiation after the fact depending on how much backlash he gets. They never know in real time, though. Have you noticed they can only tell when they are defending him.
Except when Trump actually called for violence, it happened with the insurrectionists storming and vandalizing the capitol.
So, nothing happened on J6.the horror, the horror
As I keep saying, you prove that trump Devotees, tDS are incapable of seeing reality.
THERE WAS A FUCKING RIOT AND PEOPLE GOT HURT. PEOPLE WANTED TO HANG MIKE PENCE.
That is a horror.
It's hilariously hamfisted, too.
A ten-second clip and "they called for violence"?
The sheer disdain the right wing view their supporters with is kind of amazing.
Thank you for showing how deranged the people with trump Devotee Syndrome, tDS, actually are. They want to take another man's life for following the rules of the constitution and you support that.some people still do
I reckon if you're an 11 year old boy, or somebody who has a disability, then not taking that persons words literally is an OK plan.
If they are supposedly the most powerful person in the world, why should he be treated like the examples above? He's not about 11, nor disabled.
What it means you have a man, and a media infrastructure that is design to continually allow him to evade responsibility for his words.
Last edited:
It's better than,you're starting to sound like Rain Man
"about 100 dollars, 100 dollars"
"That's not what he meant. "That's not what he meant."
