I saw it long before then. She wasn't actually functioning at that point. She was on a bingeThere were mentioning's of this when she released that weird message a weeks after her loss.
I saw it long before then. She wasn't actually functioning at that point. She was on a bingeThere were mentioning's of this when she released that weird message a weeks after her loss.
Israel remains a valuable asset to the US in the region and as such is their number 1 ally in the Middle East.This used to be the case, but now they see real hardship speading in the USA while hundreds of billions are sent to fund forign wars. The consequences are starting to arrive.
The people who they elect are then ones that vote on measures.So if it's not the voters who decide, please tell us who does.
But then the voters do have a choice, albeit an indirect one. Mellojello seems to think otherwise.The people who they elect are then ones that vote on measures.
The U.S.pulled out of Vietnam in 1973.
The first major demonstration was in 1964, and they went nationwide the following year. How many years of nationwide demonstrations is that? Even the Kent State killings didn't move the needle.
The U.S. pulled out because foreign policy changed when they started building relations with China.
Except its never been clearer that supporting Israel will lose elections and tar the US for decades.There's two parties, they both support Israel unconditionally, where's the consolation. Neither party will ever abandon Israel, unless the Middle East becomes irrelevant.
This is U S. foreign policy, the parties and the voters are irrelevant.
How is putting trump in power and spending $40 billion to make the US complicit in genocide good for the US?Israel remains a valuable asset to the US in the region and as such is their number 1 ally in the Middle East.
As so many other rational posters have just said, regardless of which party is in power, Israel will have the unconditional support of the US. That's just the way it is, folks.
Agreed. It's a tenuous choice at best. But, that's the system.But then the voters do have a choice, albeit an indirect one.
Except when Americans are caught and held by Hamas terrorists.Gaza is not even Americans dying,
I hate trump. Regardless, a trump or Harris admin. are both going to support Israel.How is putting trump in power and spending $40 billion to make the US complicit in genocide good for the US?
They are helping to support a valuable ally, that's how.How is putting trump in power and spending $40 billion to make the US complicit in genocide good for the US?
The point being that the electorate had no impact on ending that war, even with American soldiers dying.That was a war of ideology. USA vs communism. Gaza is not even Americans dying,
Exactly.Except its never been clearer that supporting Israel will lose elections and tar the US for decades.
AIPAC must have a ton of shit on all those representatives, their handlers must be keeping tabs.
Do those dems have to decide to risk their careers or risk losing their seats?
Change will come from the bottom-up; traditional media sources often parroting zionist propaganda is no longer mainstream. The world populace and the majority of the southern globe will lead with BRICKS at the head the fight against double standards. Europe is already feeling the pressure and the US is being caught up in double standards in global systems is so used against many countries. America and Israel are now most isolated countries at the UN.There's two parties, they both support Israel unconditionally, where's the consolation. Neither party will ever abandon Israel, unless the Middle East becomes irrelevant.
This is U S. foreign policy, the parties and the voters are irrelevant.