Trump to be sentenced on Jan. 10 on 34 charges, before his Jan. 20 inauguration

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
7,026
4,131
113
So he is suppose to throw the case out, where an unbiased a jury unanimously convicted tru Trump of 34 felonies because the sentence will not be harsh enough? He gave trunp preferential treatment as did every judge. Anyone else in the world would be rotting away in jail. As for your fanciful conspiracy theories, there are safeguards in place to make sure that egregious prosecution of crimes does not happen. So what if Bragg wanted to go after Trump for his crimes? Is it any different than j Edgar however or the Kennedys vowing to go after the mafia ? The safeguard that you conveniently ignore is that when a prosecutor brings charges a jury must vote to bring the charges to court. In your makebelive world no such thing happened and you allude to the misconception that Bragg and merchan cooled up some scheme to get Trump. Now if there were no juries involved your claim might be soemwhat believable, but with unanimous juries your claims are ridiculous and no rational person could take them seriously
Everyone else who wasn't Trump would never have been dragged into court over bookkeeping errors.

It was done to keep him from running for office. When that didn't work, it continued to prevent him from winning.

Both failed.

Move on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76

dirtydaveiii

Well-known member
Mar 21, 2018
7,542
5,306
113
Dave, what do you want us to do? This case is now almost dead in the water. The judge knows that an appeal is hanging over his head. Apparently, you don't understand the appeal's viability because you are stuck on the sanctimony of the jury and judge.

This case was dragged through the New York judicial system so that talking heads could say convicted felon Donald J. Trump during the election season. Again, what do want us to do? The election is over.

Are you hearing something that the judge is going to drop something big on Trump? I'm hearing quite the opposite. The judge doesn't really have too many options.

View attachment 393544
You could admit that Trump was not wrongfully convicted and that he is a convicted felon for starters. Also ackowledge that iwhe the documents case reaches trail (if Trump is still alive) that he will most certainly be convicted.
 

WyattEarp

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
7,407
2,167
113
You could admit that Trump was not wrongfully convicted and that he is a convicted felon for starters. Also ackowledge that iwhe the documents case reaches trail (if Trump is still alive) that he will most certainly be convicted.
First, why would we ignore the appeals process? There is a strong basis for an appeals hearing.

Let's also see the results with of the initial sentencing, A prominent member argued that we don't pursue justice to seek results with the punishment. In other words, the millions of dollars New York has spent to date is worth it regardless of the sentence. I'm a practical guy like several members here. Speaking for all of us, it's ludicrous to pursue some sort of justice without considering cost versus impact (as in punishment).

Me thinks you're trying to squeeze out some semblance of a victory on these pages. Can't help with you that. We can all wait for the results of the sentencing and the appeal. If the judge throws down an unconditional discharge of the case, it will be a pyrrhic victory for the prosecutor and even that win might be temporary.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,162
22,436
113
First, why would we ignore the appeals process? There is a strong basis for an appeals hearing.

Let's also see the results with of the initial sentencing, A prominent member argued that we don't pursue justice to seek results with the punishment. In other words, the millions of dollars New York has spent to date is worth it regardless of the sentence. I'm a practical guy like several members here. Speaking for all of us, it's ludicrous to pursue some sort of justice without considering cost versus impact (as in punishment).

Me thinks you're trying to squeeze out some semblance of a victory on these pages. Can't help with you that. We can all wait for the results of the sentencing and the appeal. If the judge throws down an unconditional discharge of the case, it will be a pyrrhic victory for the prosecutor and even that win might be temporary.
Until its appealed he's a convicted felon.
Them's the facts.

And off to a fine start as your new moral leader.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bver_hunter

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,162
22,436
113
Really, what criminal records have the likes of Obama or Harris either been charged with or should be charged for?
Harris/Biden get aiding genocide, sadly.

Every politician has or should have a criminal record. Why does Trump always get focused on?
We need to get back to the time when politicians were turfed just for lying, let alone breaking the law.
 
  • Like
Reactions: roddermac
Toronto Escorts