They're a POS Qatari media source, you know they're bad when even the Palestinians don't want them around.
Poorly educatedThey're a POS Qatari media source, you know they're bad when even the Palestinians don't want them around.
Yet some would lead us to believe that they are a legitimate, credible and unbiased news source.They're a POS Qatari media source, you know they're bad when even the Palestinians don't want them around.
In other words, educated people.Yet some would lead us to believe that they are a legitimate, credible and unbiased news source.
Metamucil time, its past your bedtime.Poorly educated
They're not leading me LOL . I don't trust a word they say, I'll never forget 6500 foreign workers died building their soccer stadium.Yet some would lead us to believe that they are a legitimate, credible and unbiased news source.
Poorly educatedThey're not leading me LOL . I don't trust a word they say, I'll never forget 6500 foreign workers died building their soccer stadium.
Go to bed and don't give the nurses a hard timePoorly educated
You mean like Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, NYT or WaPo?Yet some would lead us to believe that they are a legitimate, credible and unbiased news source.
They are all vastly superior to the Jizzers. So the answer is no, not like those. None of those are state run, meaning that they are all independent of government interference.You mean like Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, NYT or WaPo?
Independent of their own government, perhaps. Independent of a foreign government? I'm not so sure.None of those are state run, meaning that they are all independent of government interference.
Seeing as Qatar owns and, I imagine, funds them, independent of the former seems less likely than that of the latter.Independent of their own government, perhaps. Independent of a foreign government? I'm not so sure.
Islamaphobic brainwashing courtesy of Ziontology.Seeing as Qatar owns and, I imagine, funds them, independent of the former seems less likely than that of the latter.
Regardless, the uncertainty you express in your post seems to say they are most likely being influenced by somebody. There are lots of potential influencers.
As such, I'd say that my point stands, which is that they are not an unbiased factual reporting entity. They are not credible, as some would have us believe.
I'm sure you would prefer Al Jazeera have someone like Raffi Berg in place but getting the PA to ban then will have to do.They are all vastly superior to the Jizzers. So the answer is no, not like those. None of those are state run, meaning that they are all independent of government interference.
Welcome backI'm sure you would prefer Al Jazeera have someone like Raffi Berg in place but getting the PA to ban then will have to do.
Do you think having Berg block stories makes BBC independent?
How about Haaretz?
They face Isareli military screening but still post stories like this.
‘That’s true, but a few pro genocide bottom feeders appear to have been removed.The break was good, not much has changed here.