The alternative to manufacturing isn't tourism.Good point. Too bad a cruise ship can't park near your home town and dump a couple thousand tourists off for the day.
The alternative to manufacturing isn't tourism.Good point. Too bad a cruise ship can't park near your home town and dump a couple thousand tourists off for the day.
The alternative to manufacturing isn't bureaucrat's in Ottawa sending emails to different govt departments, eitherThe alternative to manufacturing isn't tourism.
Specifically, according to our new study, from 2019 to 2023 employment in the government sector (which includes federal, provincial and local governments nationwide) increased by 13.3 per cent compared to just 3.6 per cent in the private sector (including self-employment).
Moreover, during the four-year period, almost half of the total job growth in the Canadian economy took place in the government sector. As a result, the number of government jobs (as a share of total employment) increased by 21.1 per cent. In case you’re wondering, you can reasonably attribute this growth in government to the pandemic as most of the growth occurred post-COVID. As a result, government employment (again, as a share of total employment) in 2022 and 2023 was higher than at any point since the start of the fiscal reforms of the early 1990s.
So, why is this a problem?
Because the private sector pays for the public sector including the wages and salaries of government employees. And when you increase the size of the government-sector workforce, you increase the strain on government finances. If the share of workers employed by government continues to grow, the government must extract more money from the private sector to pay for a growing government wage bill—either in the form of higher taxes today or new debt that must be either repaid or financed indefinitely by future taxpayers. That’s the last thing taxpayers need, considering the state of government finances across the country. The federal government, for example, expects to run budget deficits of at least $20 billion for the next five years.
This raises serious questions about the health of the private sector in Canada and the effect of an increasingly expensive government wage bill on taxpayers who must ultimately foot the bill.
The government can gin up some superficial growth through increasing government employment and increasing the population through immigration. If productivity doesn't increase, it means very little in the long run.The alternative to manufacturing isn't bureaucrat's in Ottawa sending emails to different govt departments, either
you can not export bureaucrat correspondence for hard currency
In which case, wouldn't more countries be pulling out of the EU?????.....Are you paying attention? I already noted Germany is a mercantilist monster. Germany's economy depends on 47% of GDP coming from exports. Since the introduction of the Euro, much of Western Europe has deindustrialized. When facing a mercantilist behemoh in your backyard, a flexible currency would have given a country some degree of defense. The economies of Spaina and Italy have turned hard to tourism but that has run into limits and local resistance.
Enough economics for you. Please don't tell us about some universal declaration that economists believe the EU and Euro are a success. The reality is they don't all believe that. The Financial Times routinely has some commentary that disputes this belief. Der Spiegel might have more support for what you are seeking. In any event, there are varying perspectives.
Note: Mercantilism is an economic system that aims to increase a country's wealth and power by limiting imports and promoting exports. The goal is to achieve a favorable balance of trade, which means the country exports more than it imports.
PS- Even some European leaders have bemoaned falling behind the U.S. economically the last twenty years. I don't know how describe that merely as "ups and downs".
Better tell Ottawa that, Earp. Sounds like you're smarter than the Canadian government. Or the Tories because they don't put that view forward either....The government can gin up some superficial growth through increasing government employment and increasing the population through immigration. If productivity doesn't increase, it means very little in the long run.
Most of America has deindustrialized as well. Is that the EU's fault?Are you paying attention? I already noted Germany is a mercantilist monster. Germany's economy depends on 47% of GDP coming from exports. Since the introduction of the Euro, much of Western Europe has deindustrialized.
Honestly, I think they owe Germany too much money. Surely, you have seen more skepticism politically from the larger members.In which case, wouldn't more countries be pulling out of the EU?????.....
Mandrill, this has to be probably one of the worst attempts at diversion on the forum. Every economy has unique strengths, weaknesses and challenges so trying to go down the"what about" path is unproductive to the discussion.Most of America has deindustrialized as well. Is that the EU's fault?
I think the Tories are and it will be louder next year. I don't think you're a good listener when it comes to politics.Better tell Ottawa that, Earp. Sounds like you're smarter than the Canadian government. Or the Tories because they don't put that view forward either....
Yeah. Just look at how well Detroit's doing.Mandrill, this has to be probably one of the worst attempts at diversion on the forum. Every economy has unique strengths, weaknesses and challenges so trying to go down the"what about" path is unproductive to the discussion.
Let U.S. superior growth vis-a-vis Europe and German export charts speak for themselves. Something's not working in the EU.
Mandrill, this has to be probably one of the worst attempts at diversion on the forum. Every economy has unique strengths, weaknesses and challenges so trying to go down the"what about" path is unproductive to the discussion.
Let U.S. superior growth vis-a-vis Europe and German export charts speak for themselves. Something's not working in the EU.
Both public and private sector jobs can simultaneously grow and are not mutually exclusive.The alternative to manufacturing isn't bureaucrat's in Ottawa sending emails to different govt departments, either
you can not export bureaucrat correspondence for hard currency
Once again you have missed the pointBoth public and private sector jobs can simultaneously grow and are not mutually exclusive.
get back to us with that argument when they are self sustainingThe public sector employees are also tax payers.
Public sector jobs require funding from the government. Not the private sector.private sector.do not require funding by the public sector .
where do think the govt gets the funds from ?Public sector jobs require funding from the government. Not the private sector.
tax incentives ?The public sector in return provides everything from infrastructure to tax incentives, to the private sector.
that is pure nonsense and economic gibberishIt is deficit financing that affords you the quality of life you have.
more nonsense, with the smell of putrid MarxismThe private sector does not do anything to better the lives of the common citizen.
the shareholder interests are not served unless the customers / clints interests are served firstThey only live to serve the interest of the shareholder.
it seems to keep you well fed and surfing the internetTrickle down economics does not work.
Taxes are government revenue, not private sector funding.where do think the govt gets the funds from ?
the private sector
how's that laptop you are posting form working for you?
it seems to keep you well fed and surfing the internet
where do think the govt gets the government revenue from ?Taxes are government revenue, not private sector funding.
hmmThe laptop I am posting from is a for profit product sold to me.
The private sector does not do anything to better the lives of the common citizen.
Surfing the internet?That is not a service.
And you should thank the profit seeking private sector participants for that factYes, I am well fed.
#1 . the socialist experiment in Canada created far more of those who are not fed wellWhat about the ones who aren't? What does trickle down economics do for them?
do not be ridiculous, you spew disingenuous rubbishNothing. So it does not work.
all of which are now at risk because of irresponsible left wing, socialist spending and dependence on unsustainable debtThe government aka public sector is what keeps those people fed and healthy.
They are also the ones who help us have a good quality of life - free healthcare, roads, infrastructure and so on.
Keep telling yourself that. The right isn't exactly a bastion for free speech with their book bans and freakout over pronouns. But you having the gall to call anyone unCanadian is the kicker.It's ironic that you're telling me I don't have the right to speak my mind and voice my opinion.
THAT is why the left is in decline.
You summed it up in two sentences.
Have I demanded you can't say something like you did?Keep telling yourself that. The right isn't exactly a bastion for free speech with their book bans and freakout over pronouns. But you having the gall to call anyone unCanadian is the kicker.