Short look at the Frazer report data
]The report's logical coherence is undermined by several factors. First, the comparison between public sector growth and total workforce expansion lacks context, making it unclear whether the public sector's 46.7% share of job growth from 2019 to 2023 reflects a small or large overall economic expansion.
the maximum a G7 economy grew @ 2019 to 2023 was 3% annually.
Govt does not need to grow at the same rate as the economy
Canada now has 1 tax collector for every 700 taxpayers
The US has 1 tax collector for every 7000 taxpayers
economic growth requires efficient productivity
Additionally, the transition between the 2019-2023 data and the 2024 public sector numbers is not clearly explained, leaving it ambiguous whether the 4.4 million figure includes only pre-2024 growth or if it reflects further increases in 2024.
irrelevant- govt has grown at an alarming rate 9 out 9 years of deficits is proof positive
The percentages of public sector growth (46.7%) and its share of the total workforce (21%) are not directly comparable, as they relate to different metrics (growth rate vs. share of total jobs).
govt jobs are paid for by private sector jobs or unsustainable borrowing
one in five jobs being govt is unsustainable
Furthermore, the report lacks an analysis of the broader economic implications, such as the potential crowding out of private sector jobs or the impact on public spending and taxpayer burdens, leaving key questions about sustainability unaddressed.
the question of sustainability is common sense
9 out 9 years of deficits is proof positive
Overall, the absence of detailed context and clearer connections between the data points weakens the report's logical foundation.
pure nonsense
the socialist experiment has been tried in Canada for 9 years and it has failed miserably
we need to shrink govt and very soon
