Elon Musk to head Trump's Gestapo.

jimidean2011

Well-known member
Sep 1, 2011
2,470
2,341
113
He was found liable for sexual abuse and defamation in E. Jean Caroll's case.
Since most rapes are not reported or even convicted, the conviction in a criminal court doesn't matter.
Is there any truth to the claim that he sexually abused aka raped, E. Jean Caroll?
Well since he was found liable for sexual abuse and defamation, there is.
You cannot be found liable for something without having committed the act.
Trying to finagle legal semantics into a rape conviction is a true sign of desperation. I suspect you don't have any mirrors in your house.
 

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
6,590
3,774
113
He was found liable for sexual abuse and defamation in E. Jean Caroll's case.
Since most rapes are not reported or even convicted, the conviction in a criminal court doesn't matter.
Is there any truth to the claim that he sexually abused aka raped, E. Jean Caroll?
Well since he was found liable for sexual abuse and defamation, there is.
You cannot be found liable for something without having committed the act.
"The conviction in a criminal court doesn't matter"

That line alone shows how out of touch you are reality as well as your ignorance about the difference between civil and criminal court.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jimidean2011

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
1,549
1,065
113
"The conviction in a criminal court doesn't matter"

That line alone shows how out of touch you are reality as well as your ignorance about the difference between civil and criminal court.
Nice mental gymnastics there.
Lets try again.
Was he found liable for sexual abuse in a court of law?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: jimidean2011

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
32,708
60,705
113
Thanks, saw you were dead wrong all these months with that kind of thinking. Face reality old man.

There’s no alternative. Conservatives are the new normal.
Conservatives have never not been part of the normal in the US.
But "this is a landslide because I want to call it that" is just silly.

This is in the bottom fifth end of wins by popular vote and may drop lower than that when the counting is done.
It's in the bottom quarter or so of electoral college wins.

It was a solid, definitive win.
It's not a landslide.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shaquille Oatmeal

richaceg

Well-known member
Feb 11, 2009
13,804
5,581
113
Answered in my previous post.
Example:
Investing in Tesla, and then pushing out its engineers and original founders, and then calling himself "product architect" is a con.
He knows nothing about architecting an automobile or the engineering of it.
There are many like that.
Here is an article from 2009.
His entire career is based on stealing other's ideas and passing it off as his own.
That is a con.
At issue: Whether Martin Eberhard, the company's first CEO, or Elon Musk, its current one, got to call himself "founder." Eberhard filed suit against Musk three months ago, alleging libel and slander because Musk, an early investor in Tesla, had started calling himself the company's founder.
In fact, Eberhard and Marc Tarpenning are the company's actual founders.
It's not the first time Musk has fussed about being called "founder." He started a company, X.com, which merged with another startup, Confinity. Confinity's main product was PayPal, and that became the name of the new company. In leaving PayPal, Musk went to great lengths to make sure he'd be referred to as "founder."
Jnvestors and start ups do this dance most of the time...what's the con here?
 
  • Like
Reactions: jimidean2011

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
1,549
1,065
113
Let's try again...you called him a rapist.
Or was this just your mental gymnastics to backtrack?
Nice pivot.
I asked a question.
Was he found liable for sexual abuse in civil court? Yes or No?
For someone who is all about the legal claptrap, you should be able to answer this without the mental gymnastics.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: jimidean2011

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
13,423
2,050
113
Ghawar
You could say the same about putin. The truth is musk only supported Trump because he knew he could own him. Trump only became a Republican because he knew they were far easier to manipulate and control. Same as JD Vance
It makes as much sense to say Netanyahu and Israel preferred
Trump to win the election over Harris because they knew they
could own him.

The greatest president in American history has already marked himself
out as a better poodle for the master of his country as well.
 

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
6,590
3,774
113
Nice pivot.
I asked a question.
Was he found liable for sexual abuse in civil court? Yes or No?
For someone who is all about the legal claptrap, you should be able to answer this without the mental gymnastics.
Before you asked your question you called him a racist.
I corrected you and you pivoted to asking questions without admitting you were wrong to call him a rapist.

Don't accuse others of doing what you yourself do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jimidean2011
Toronto Escorts