Elon Musk to head Trump's Gestapo.

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

who did he con?

Answered in my previous post.
Example:
Investing in Tesla, and then pushing out its engineers and original founders, and then calling himself "product architect" is a con.
He knows nothing about architecting an automobile or the engineering of it.
There are many like that.
Here is an article from 2009.
His entire career is based on stealing other's ideas and passing it off as his own.
That is a con.

Tesla CEO Settles for “Founder” Title

Electric-car startup’s main backer and its former CEO have ended a squabble over words.

www.nbcbayarea.com

At issue: Whether Martin Eberhard, the company's first CEO, or Elon Musk, its current one, got to call himself "founder." Eberhard filed suit against Musk three months ago, alleging libel and slander because Musk, an early investor in Tesla, had started calling himself the company's founder.
In fact, Eberhard and Marc Tarpenning are the company's actual founders.
It's not the first time Musk has fussed about being called "founder." He started a company, X.com, which merged with another startup, Confinity. Confinity's main product was PayPal, and that became the name of the new company. In leaving PayPal, Musk went to great lengths to make sure he'd be referred to as "founder."

 

[Skoob]

Yes I am not as good of a con man as Elon.
Guilty as charged.

I'd believe you more if you removed the word "con" from your statement.

 

[Skoob]

Maybe.
But not as shallow as some people who would resort to mental gymnasticst to argue that a convicted felon and a rapist is neither of those things, because ideology is more important than the truth for them.

People are only convicted in criminal court. So you're wrong there.
Never convicted of rape. You're wrong there again.
Felon? For bookkeeping anomalies before he was president? No one really cares. Dems failed to exploit that sham so even they weren't convinced it would stick.

Lets' be honest here...you hated the guy long before any lawfare took place. Just admit it.

 

[Frankfooter]

How pathetic can you be? You call the man a rapist, I ask you to support that statement and you just ignore it all together because you know you can't.

its true
So why do you back a rapist?

 

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

People are only convicted in criminal court. So you're wrong there.

He was found liable for sexual abuse and defamation in E. Jean Caroll's case.
Since most rapes are not reported or even convicted, the conviction in a criminal court doesn't matter.
Is there any truth to the claim that he sexually abused aka raped, E. Jean Caroll?
Well since he was found liable for sexual abuse and defamation, there is.
You cannot be found liable for something without having committed the act.

 

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

I'd believe you more if you removed the word "con" from your statement.

It would be more appropriate for you to remove 'koob' from your handle and replace it with 'tan'.

 

[Skoob]

Would you mind supplying me with the name(s) of Trump's rape victim(s)?

No rape.
No matter how many times I have to provide the official jury report to these loonies on here, they can't accept it.

 

[Skoob]

It would be more appropriate for you to remove 'koob' from your handle and replace it with 'tan'.

Stan?

Oh nevermind...I see you started drinking early today. Carry on.

 

[Skoob]

He was found liable for sexual abuse and defamation in E. Jean Caroll's case.
Since most rapes are not reported or even convicted, the conviction in a criminal court doesn't matter.
Is there any truth to the claim that he sexually abused aka raped, E. Jean Caroll?
Well since he was found liable for sexual abuse and defamation, there is.
You cannot be found liable for something without having committed the act.

"The conviction in a criminal court doesn't matter"

That line alone shows how out of touch you are reality as well as your ignorance about the difference between civil and criminal court.

 

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

Stan?

Oh nevermind...I see you started drinking early today. Carry on.

Yeah, an appropriate name for an Elon Stan such as yourself.

 

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

"The conviction in a criminal court doesn't matter"

That line alone shows how out of touch you are reality as well as your ignorance about the difference between civil and criminal court.

Nice mental gymnastics there.
Lets try again.
Was he found liable for sexual abuse in a court of law?

 

[Valcazar]

Thanks, saw you were dead wrong all these months with that kind of thinking. Face reality old man.

There’s no alternative. Conservatives are the new normal.

Conservatives have never not been part of the normal in the US.
But "this is a landslide because I want to call it that" is just silly.

This is in the bottom fifth end of wins by popular vote and may drop lower than that when the counting is done.
It's in the bottom quarter or so of electoral college wins.

It was a solid, definitive win.
It's not a landslide.

 

[richaceg]

Answered in my previous post.
Example:
Investing in Tesla, and then pushing out its engineers and original founders, and then calling himself "product architect" is a con.
He knows nothing about architecting an automobile or the engineering of it.
There are many like that.
Here is an article from 2009.
His entire career is based on stealing other's ideas and passing it off as his own.
That is a con.

Tesla CEO Settles for “Founder” Title

Electric-car startup’s main backer and its former CEO have ended a squabble over words.

www.nbcbayarea.com

At issue: Whether Martin Eberhard, the company's first CEO, or Elon Musk, its current one, got to call himself "founder." Eberhard filed suit against Musk three months ago, alleging libel and slander because Musk, an early investor in Tesla, had started calling himself the company's founder.
In fact, Eberhard and Marc Tarpenning are the company's actual founders.
It's not the first time Musk has fussed about being called "founder." He started a company, X.com, which merged with another startup, Confinity. Confinity's main product was PayPal, and that became the name of the new company. In leaving PayPal, Musk went to great lengths to make sure he'd be referred to as "founder."

Jnvestors and start ups do this dance most of the time...what's the con here?

 

[richaceg]

Nice mental gymnastics there.
Lets try again.
Was he found liable for sexual abuse in a court of law?

So not rape? He's charge (under appeal) for rough sex...

 

[Valcazar]

So not rape? He's charge (under appeal) for rough sex...

I almost wish I could hang around.
"He was charged for rough sex"?

Is that the new nonsense?
"Bitches be lying and its just regret because the sex was too rough (even though they were totally into it, really)"?

 

[Frankfooter]

Trying to finagle legal semantics into a rape conviction is a true sign of desperation. I suspect you don't have any mirrors in your house.

The correct language is that trump is an adjudicated rapist and a judge found the legally correct term to describe trump is as a rapist.
Deal with it

 

[Frankfooter]

So not rape? He's charge (under appeal) for rough sex...

Don't tell me you think all rape is just 'rough sex'.

 

[Skoob]

Nice mental gymnastics there.
Lets try again.
Was he found liable for sexual abuse in a court of law?

Let's try again...you called him a rapist.
Or was this just your mental gymnastics to backtrack?

 

[Skoob]

Yeah, an appropriate name for an Elon Stan such as yourself.

Yeah...you definitely started drinking early.
btw you should buy a round for the voices in your head.

 

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

Jnvestors and start ups do this dance most of the time...what's the con here?

No they dont.
Calling himself a founder, when he isn't is one example of a con.