Maybe.
But not as shallow as some people who would resort to mental gymnasticst to argue that a convicted felon and a rapist is neither of those things, because ideology is more important than the truth for them.
Elon Musk to head Trump's Gestapo.
- Thread starter Ceiling Cat
- Start date
But not as shallow as some people who would resort to mental gymnasticst to argue that a convicted felon and a rapist is neither of those things, because ideology is more important than the truth for them.
I don’t understand why the conservatives cannot just accept that he is a conman and a criminal. Wouldn’t it trigger libs even more?
good thing for you jealousy, bitterness and mis-guided hatred are not felony crimes
out of compassion for others these are just misdemeanor crimes without fines, incarceration or official record,
the only penalty is a suggestion you undergo some self re-evaluation and you receive a less than sincere "good luck with that"
to ensure all the loonie left boxes are ticked, the victimhood category needs to be filled in
you are the only victim here, unless somebody else was convinced by your strange line of thinking
Last edited:
muttering "grab them by the pussy" is perhaps not the best phrase to say in mixed company
however if its used as evidence to illustrate the mindset of a heterosexual male a lot more courthouses are going to be needed
You're a couple years too late for that.
The court already ruled that statement stands as evidence that trump is a rapist.
Nah.
He was a con before that.
He was called as such by many before that.
Nothing to do with Trump.
How pathetic can you be? You call the man a rapist, I ask you to support that statement and you just ignore it all together because you know you can't. You make accusations with no factual evidence and think that's ok because you are petty and butt hurt yet lack the ability to even recognize that about yourself. Rape is an incredibly serious accusation and an incredibly serious offense yet you have no problem painting someone with that brush simply because you don't like them. Yet if the shoe were on the other foot and I said an escort told me that you raped her you would be ok with that right? Some how I doubt that. If you want to call him a rapist show some proof. Otherwise stick to making fun of his hair and small hands. Both of those are based in facts.
who did he con? it doesn't matter if he's associated with Trump or not...it's better to have receipts...we can't be throwing away words like rapists, thief, con...it takes away the meaning once we use those words conveniently without facts to back it up. being called a con doesn't mean it's true...
Answered in my previous post.
Example:
Investing in Tesla, and then pushing out its engineers and original founders, and then calling himself "product architect" is a con.
He knows nothing about architecting an automobile or the engineering of it.
There are many like that.
Here is an article from 2009.
His entire career is based on stealing other's ideas and passing it off as his own.
That is a con.
Tesla CEO Settles for “Founder” Title
Electric-car startup’s main backer and its former CEO have ended a squabble over words.
www.nbcbayarea.com
In fact, Eberhard and Marc Tarpenning are the company's actual founders.
It's not the first time Musk has fussed about being called "founder." He started a company, X.com, which merged with another startup, Confinity. Confinity's main product was PayPal, and that became the name of the new company. In leaving PayPal, Musk went to great lengths to make sure he'd be referred to as "founder."
Last edited:
I'd believe you more if you removed the word "con" from your statement.
And his oatmeal too!
Truth be told it looks like shaq got grabbed by the pussy and didn't like it very much.People are only convicted in criminal court. So you're wrong there.
Never convicted of rape. You're wrong there again.
Felon? For bookkeeping anomalies before he was president? No one really cares. Dems failed to exploit that sham so even they weren't convinced it would stick.
Lets' be honest here...you hated the guy long before any lawfare took place. Just admit it.
He was found liable for sexual abuse and defamation in E. Jean Caroll's case.
Since most rapes are not reported or even convicted, the conviction in a criminal court doesn't matter.
Is there any truth to the claim that he sexually abused aka raped, E. Jean Caroll?
Well since he was found liable for sexual abuse and defamation, there is.
You cannot be found liable for something without having committed the act.
It would be more appropriate for you to remove 'koob' from your handle and replace it with 'tan'.
No rape.
No matter how many times I have to provide the official jury report to these loonies on here, they can't accept it.
