Precisely! But don't go trying to force her to be intelligent. It seems like she's rather happy in her bubble.as long as we keep lefties from any leadership role
there won't be "next pandemic"
Precisely! But don't go trying to force her to be intelligent. It seems like she's rather happy in her bubble.as long as we keep lefties from any leadership role
there won't be "next pandemic"
absolutelyThis thread is 'IN YOUR FACE LEFTIES...."
You really declaring that right wingers are civil?
If you were able to open your eyes and put down the Kool Aid the world would be a healthier and more intelligent place but hey, no pressure. Work at your own pace....If you guys were able to laugh a bit and stop being so polarized the world would be a better place.
Since when was over inflating the value of a property a felony? Oh ya, when Trump did it. For anyone else it's a misdemeanor
So generally illegal immigrants commit less crime than citizens.How about an illegal that has been in the USA for decades then commits robbery or murder. Should they be deported or do they get to stay because they've "planted roots"?
You've been saying the same thing for years, how is this different?absolutely
payback is a bitch, isn't it
we are just finally saying ENOUGH !
sorry it offends you
It wont.You can physically secure a border all you want, but if policy exists that allow illegals to circumvent the law such as 'parole in place' then you only incentivize more illegal immigration.
Trump is the president againYou've been saying the same thing for years, how is this different?
Irrelevant. If there were no illegal immigrants, they'd commit ZERO crime.So generally illegal immigrants commit less crime than citizens.
Native born Americans, followed by illegal immigrants, followed by legal immigrants - order of criminality.
However a substantial number of Americans think immigration and crime are related.
If an illegal commits murder, they should be deported, regardless of time spent living illegally in the country.So the longer they stay, the less likely they are to commit crime.
If it does happen, then it should be considered along humanitarian grounds to see if they have roots, families etc.,
And if there were no people at all in the country then there would be 0 crime.Irrelevant. If there were no illegal immigrants, they'd commit ZERO crime.
If an illegal commits murder, they should be deported, regardless of time spent living illegally in the country.
Your argument is essentially... 'the longer you've been breaking the law, the better the chances of you staying.'
Do you see the incentive this creates?
if you enter the country illegally you are a criminalBut you are! Deporting people who pays taxes and made their life here withoutbeing criminal,
I have looked at both sides of this and .... its an unresolvable quagmirewomen are being bullied online with "your body, my choice" litteraly everywhere,
I do not hate trans or lgbtq,trans and lgbtq are scared to walk in the street so yes, absolutely can we leave the hate aside?!
This isn't a rebuttal. It makes no sense. There is no country if there are no people.And if there were no people at all in the country then there would be 0 crime.
That does not work for an argument.
But we don't have to accept illegal immigrants. If they cannot stay, they cannot commit crime whether they're here for a day or decades.People and crime go together regardless of their status. We have to accept this.
The longer they stay the less likely they are to commit crime.
Nobody has a right to citizenship in another country by illegally crossing its border.The lack of a piece of paper authorizing their presence is not such a big deal that you should engage in human rights abuses via mass deportations.
The crime, the devaluing of wages, and the culture of illegal immigrants impact everyone.You are advocating for this despite not being affected by illegal immigrants.
This is the problem with this policy.
It drums up hatred when there is no need for it and ends up actually materializing into human rights abuses.
Exactly.if you enter the country illegally you are a criminal
illegal should be self explanatory
boarders need to be secure
beside you are not treating those that legally apply equally by permitting illegal entry
Equal is not just equal when it is convenient
Which is why you strengthen border security and fix the immigration system to reduce illegal immigration.This isn't a rebuttal. It makes no sense. There is no country if there are no people.
But we don't have to accept illegal immigrants. If they cannot stay, they cannot commit crime whether they're here for a day or decades.
Nobody has a right to citizenship in another country by illegally crossing its border.
This is not a human rights issue. It's an issue of national sovereignty, security, and the rights, freedoms, and protections of citizens.
The crime, the devaluing of wages, and the culture of illegal immigrants impact everyone.
The cow farmer doesn't think that cow manure is affecting anyone and he doesn't even smell it. But everyone else far enough from his farm can smell the cow shit on him when he comes to visit.
You're the farmer. You're impacted without knowing it.
They tried this and were called racists for it. That was the real issue. Then Biden opened everything up.Which is why you strengthen border security and fix the immigration system to reduce illegal immigration.
And deport anyone in the future.
But with the already present 11M, you deport the criminal ones and give a path to citizenship for the rest.
It is the most practical solution that benefits the state while avoiding a human rights crisis.
Illegal immigrants do jobs that Americans wont do or do not want to do.
So devaluing of wages is not an issue.
Biden was an idiot.They tried this and were called racists for it. That was the real issue. Then Biden opened everything up.
once again your logic is very flawedAnd if there were no people at all in the country then there would be 0 crime.
That does not work for an argument.
Actual noPeople and crime go together regardless of their status. We have to accept this.
The longer they stay the less likely they are to commit crime.
Detaining a criminal (ie illegal) and returning them to the scene of the crime (the boarder) and is not a human rights abuseThe lack of a piece of paper authorizing their presence is not such a big deal that you should engage in human rights abuses via mass deportations.
We want to treat all applicants for immigration equally, the only way to do that is to accept legally processed applicants and only legally processed applicantsYou are advocating for this despite not being affected by illegal immigrants.
You whine that deporting criminals are human rights abusesIt drums up hatred when there is no need for it and ends up actually materializing into human rights abuses.
What rights are you worried sex workers will lose in Canada under a conservative government exactly? Or as a woman, for that matter? Real question.Are you serious?
Today is a very sad day for women's, lgbtq's AND sex workers rights. It's not our battle but it is. This will also affect ours. If a guy like Pollievre pass, there will be a humongous shitshow around here (I don't like the Liberal either, if that matters). What is going on is really, really bad.
Also the Trumpist on a review board that copulate with sex workers but celebrate this kind of victory sound so weird to me. Make it make sense!
Conservative = right. Right do not like prostitute. They don't like you. From there anything is possible.What rights are you worried sex workers will lose in Canada under a conservative government exactly?
You whine that China is not a success story because of their human rights abuses despite being the 2nd largest economy and soon to be the largest economy in the world.You whine that deporting criminals are human rights abuses
While at same time declare China a success story despite knowing they murdered 20 to 50 million (or more) of their own people
Your logic is a clown show