once again your logic is very flawedAnd if there were no people at all in the country then there would be 0 crime.
That does not work for an argument.
if there were no people at all in the country, it would not be a country, it would be an uninhabited chunk of land
Actual noPeople and crime go together regardless of their status. We have to accept this.
The longer they stay the less likely they are to commit crime.
They committed a crime by entering the country illegally
And they are committing a crime every day they remain in the ILLGALLY enter country
Illegal should be self explanatory
You loonies really get confused about well defined words
Detaining a criminal (ie illegal) and returning them to the scene of the crime (the boarder) and is not a human rights abuseThe lack of a piece of paper authorizing their presence is not such a big deal that you should engage in human rights abuses via mass deportations.
They did not have the right to enter the country
If you enter my home without permission, you are going to leave one way or another
We want to treat all applicants for immigration equally, the only way to do that is to accept legally processed applicants and only legally processed applicantsYou are advocating for this despite not being affected by illegal immigrants.
All others are criminals
You loonies shout scream , jump up and down about equality and then hypocritically expect criminals to be treated as special, while ignoring the long list of legal applicants
Equal should be self explanatory.
it is bewildering you get confused by a word you use so often
You whine that deporting criminals are human rights abusesIt drums up hatred when there is no need for it and ends up actually materializing into human rights abuses.
While at same time declare China a success story despite knowing they murdered 20 to 50 million (or more) of their own people
Your logic is a clown show