Ford passed the legislation for ripping up the bike lanes TODAY!!

NotADcotor

His most imperial galactic atheistic majesty.
Mar 8, 2017
7,318
4,962
113
Cyclists were a bigger threat to pedestrians than drivers ever were. At least most drivers follow the rules most of the time.
This guy wrote a book about car free cities, one can't accuse him of being pro car that's for sure.

Even he said bikes should not be allowed in a car free city, they just don't mix well with peds.
 

Anbarandy

Bitter House****
Apr 27, 2006
10,875
3,458
113
I don’t think I ever saw 4 cops not allowing a car to pass for no reason other than douchebaggery.
Seriously? Cops don't engage in douchebaggery?

Why would I allow an aggressive, road hogging, law breaking driver who has endangered me to continue on his merry road raging way?

I have every right to occupy a whole lane especially if it is to cool the raging driver down who has put my safety at risk.

It happens much too often.

I cycle on the road with motor vehicles, dump trucks, streetcar tracks, parked cars, curbs, potholes restricting me to about a foot so of leeway and if a motherfucker aggressive driver puts my safety in peril I will cool this motherfucker's jets down.

I hardly use bike lanes, unless necessary, but many other cyclists need a bike lane to feel some sense of safety.
 
Last edited:

NotADcotor

His most imperial galactic atheistic majesty.
Mar 8, 2017
7,318
4,962
113
The logical flaw is that failure on 1 transportation issue is failure on all of them. We all think the crosstown is a fuck-up - although much of the fuckedness likely pre dates Ford. But that doesn't mean that the bike lanes aren't an awful fuck-up as well.

Hopefully they both get fixed.
The autobahn plans predated Hitler.

So Ford is Hitler?

Logic ;)

And it's a fucking joke people.
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
76,192
86,828
113
Seriously? Cops don't engage in douchebaggery?

Why would I allow an aggressive, road hogging, law breaking driver who has endangered me to continue on his merry road raging way?

I have every right to occupy a whole lane especially if it is to cool the raging driver down who has put my safety at risk.

It happens much too often.

I cycle on the road, motor vehicles, dump trucks, streetcar tracks, parked cars, curbs potholes restricting me to about a foot so of leeway and if a motherfucker aggressive puts my safety in peril I will cool this motherfucker's jets down.

I hardly use bike lanes, unless necessary, but many other cyclists need a bike lane to feel some sense of safety.
:rolleyes:

You'll end up getting charged and having a court date.

Or else pissing off a dude who's younger, stronger and tougher than you and getting shoved around.
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
76,192
86,828
113
You, oops I mean Doug should also enact legislation and if that legislation is ruled unlawful, should invoke the notwithstanding clause for the millionth time to override the constitution and ban e-bikes, e-vehicles and the like from Toronto.
The notwithstanding clause has never been invoked in Ontario, IIRC.

You must suffer from DDD - Duggler Dysphoria Disease. I understand it's highly contagious and passed from latte to latte at super-elitist, hipster lunch venues.
 

JuanGoodman

Goldmember
Jun 29, 2019
4,255
3,495
113
Why would I allow an aggressive, road hogging, law breaking driver who has endangered me to continue on his merry road raging way?

I have every right to occupy a whole lane especially if it is to cool the raging driver down who has put my safety at risk.

It happens much too often.

I cycle on the road, motor vehicles, dump trucks, streetcar tracks, parked cars, curbs potholes restricting me to about a foot so of leeway and if a motherfucker aggressive puts my safety in peril I will cool this motherfucker's jets down.

I hardly use bike lanes, unless necessary, but many other cyclists need a bike lane to feel some sense of safety.
I actually doubt very much that you really do that, for your sake

but if you really do, it's just a matter of time before you piss off someone who is already having a bad day

you better quit while you're ahead
 

glamphotographer

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2011
16,985
17,079
113
Canada
It's been proven for over 50 years, induced demand. Adding more lanes just adds more cars, it doesn't solve congestion.


 
Last edited:

glamphotographer

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2011
16,985
17,079
113
Canada
After all the bike lanes are gone and added lanes and still stuck in traffic on a 6-lane road, Ford will legalize driving on sidewalks.

 
Last edited:

Anbarandy

Bitter House****
Apr 27, 2006
10,875
3,458
113
:rolleyes:

You'll end up getting charged and having a court date.

Or else pissing off a dude who's younger, stronger and tougher than you and getting shoved around.
Charged for what, cycling on the road?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

Anbarandy

Bitter House****
Apr 27, 2006
10,875
3,458
113
I actually doubt very much that you really do that, for your sake

but if you really do, it's just a matter of time before you piss off someone who is already having a bad day

you better quit while you're ahead
Believe me, I have when it has been warranted and it has been on quite a few occasions and on one occasion on Queen S. West in Parkdale a cop on construction duty saw a cabby who repeatedly attempted to interrupt my safe travel by repeatedly angling and abruptly jerking forward the nose of his cab into my path and guess what happened?

Cop walks up to him and says to the cabbie. "You saw me standing in the middle of the road and yet still did this? I can't believe it, what were you thinking, huh?

I gave the cop my statement and biked smiling away, the cabbie did not go anywhere.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

wigglee

Well-known member
Oct 13, 2010
10,242
2,152
113
I like some bike lanes and hate others. I generally think city hall is a bunch of idiots, but Ford has no right to meddle in the city's affairs. He's been screwing with the city ever since his brother was ousted and Druggie lost the mayoral race.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,436
6,696
113
Is it fair to assume that Ford wants the city to pay for everything?

If Ford thinks the province should be in charge of city roads, he'd better pick up the tab for their maintenance.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,436
6,696
113
:rolleyes:

You'll end up getting charged and having a court date.
...
As I understand it, a cyclist only has to pull to the right where it is safe to do so.

There are several underpasses near me where there is no bailout option for cyclists so I will take up enough of the lane to make sure that I'm safe,

Stay to the right
Ride in a straight line on the right-hand side of the road at least one metre from the curb or from parked cars, where practical.

When being passed, stay as close to the right side of the road as you can. You are allowed to use any part of the lane for safety reasons such as avoiding obstacles in your lane.

You do not need to stay to the right when:

  • preparing to turn left
  • passing another vehicle
  • you are going faster than other vehicles
  • the lane is too narrow to share
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
76,192
86,828
113
As I understand it, a cyclist only has to pull to the right where it is safe to do so.

There are several underpasses near me where there is no bailout option for cyclists so I will take up enough of the lane to make sure that I'm safe,

Stay to the right
Ride in a straight line on the right-hand side of the road at least one metre from the curb or from parked cars, where practical.

When being passed, stay as close to the right side of the road as you can. You are allowed to use any part of the lane for safety reasons such as avoiding obstacles in your lane.

You do not need to stay to the right when:

  • preparing to turn left
  • passing another vehicle
  • you are going faster than other vehicles
  • the lane is too narrow to share
All of which is sensible and a lot different to riding slowly in the middle of a car lane to deliberately drive motorists trapped behind you crazy.
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
76,192
86,828
113
Is it fair to assume that Ford wants the city to pay for everything?

If Ford thinks the province should be in charge of city roads, he'd better pick up the tab for their maintenance.
I don't think it's going to work out like that.
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
76,192
86,828
113
I like some bike lanes and hate others. I generally think city hall is a bunch of idiots, but Ford has no right to meddle in the city's affairs. He's been screwing with the city ever since his brother was ousted and Druggie lost the mayoral race.
Except he does with transportation stuff, if it's significant enough.

The benchmark was City Hall wanting to tear down the Gardiner and create holy fucking chaos throughout the entire region. Just no. The province has to step in.

The bike lanes are in the grey area. Ford's being pushed by his developer bag-men and the recent collapse of the downtown condo market, which coincided with a series of articles on "Toronto's gridlock". This is what sparked stupid like the "tunnel beneath the 401".

The concern with the bike lanes is that the bikies - like Anny - also talk about MORE bike lanes and closing downtown Toronto to traffic and generally snarl out "war on car" slogans. Anny does this continually with his dumb "bottleneck" graphics and photos of the DVP and 401 jammed with cars and ranting about how the future has to have less cars.

If commonsense pushback starts with ripping up the Bloor bike lane, then at least it sends a signal.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts