You are obsessed with Modi.But your idol called Modi was far worse than Mulroney:
You are obsessed with Modi.But your idol called Modi was far worse than Mulroney:
Maybe you forgot that Modi is the culprit in this whole affair.You are obsessed with Modi.
The culprits are these foreign separatists using and abusing their citizenship privileges.Maybe you forgot that Modi is the culprit in this whole affair.
But you of course idolize him!!
Once again the bribe was from his time in office, irrespective of when he received it.Mulroney was not a politician when he was alleged to have accepted money.
He had stepped down and was a private citizen.
I asked you to show me an example where a politician accepted money directly into his chequing account.
You failed.
No the bribe was not from his time in office.Once again the bribe was from his time in office, irrespective of when he received it.
You again failed to answer my question in the first place. Face it, as you do not have a response!!
No, the ones that ordered the killings, extortion and threats to Canadians.The culprits are these foreign separatists using and abusing their citizenship privileges.
Those are the Sikh separatists.No, the ones that ordered the killings, extortion and threats to Canadians.
Again you cannot comprehend that the bribes were due to the airbus contracts that were signed during his time in office:No the bribe was not from his time in office.
It was between 93 and 94 when he had stepped down as PM.
Those are the facts.
You failed at your example.
Your question is useless as it is a red herring especially given your failure.
In 1995, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) accused Mulroney and Frank Moores of accepting kickbacks from Karlheinz Schreiber on the sale of Airbus airplanes to the government-owned airline during Mulroney's time as Prime Minister of Canada. The allegations were made in a letter sent by the RCMP to the government of Switzerland seeking access to banking records. Schreiber had earlier raised money for Mulroney's successful 1983 bid to win the leadership of the Progressive Conservative Party.
Then go and give your evidence to the RCMP. Really all useless allegations with the present day Sikhs who are peacefully protesting for an Independent Khalistan.Those are the Sikh separatists.
They are engaged in crime, gun running, terrorism and other criminal activities.
Revoke and deport!
From your Article:Again you cannot comprehend that the bribes were due to the airbus contracts that were signed during his time in office:
Airbus affair - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Enough said!!
India has given it to the RCMP.Then go and give your evidence to the RCMP. Really all useless allegations with the present day Sikhs who are peacefully protesting for an Independent Khalistan.
They have the Divine Rights to do so in a Democratic Nation like Canada!!
I guess according to you they have the divine rights to bomb a plane and kill 300 people.They have the Divine Rights to do so in a Democratic Nation like Canada!!
He accepted the bribes....... period. Tell us why would they pay him after he left office, if it did not point to the his time in office.From your Article:
Although there is no evidence that Mulroney accepted kickbacks while prime minister, he acknowledged in 2003 that shortly after stepping down in 1993 that he accepted $225,000 over 18 months from Schreiber, in three cash payments of $75,000 each.
As I said, you failed.
Mulroney was still a member of the House of Commons of Canada when one of the payments was made. Mulroney claims that this money was paid to him for consulting services he rendered to help promote a fresh pasta business, and to develop international contacts for Schreiber. Mulroney had previously not admitted accepting any commissions from Schreiber during his lawsuit against the Canadian government, and later under oath specifically denied any business dealings with him. Mulroney has not yet provided evidence of any work he performed for that money, and declared it as income to Revenue Canada only years later, when Schreiber had come under criminal investigation in Germany. Schreiber ridiculed their dealings in pasta-macaroni as nothing more than being sent a single flyer, and has stated that the three separate payments were actually $100,000 each in $1000 bills, a total of $300,000.
So those who were responsible were arrested and served their time. Yet you lump all the Sikhs in that category.I guess according to you they have the divine rights to bomb a plane and kill 300 people.
That was for his consulting business where it would be legitimate to accept payments into your bank accounts.He accepted the bribes....... period. Tell us why would they pay him after he left office, if it did not point to the his toime in office.
By the way read the whole context of this enquiry:
Airbus affair - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
So one payment received while he was still in office. Well you failed!!
The ones protesting are not all Sikhs.So those who were responsible were arrested and served their time. Yet you lump all the Sikhs in that category.
Prove that all those protesting peacefully are "Terrorists" in your vocabulary!!
If it was not declared in his tax returns or declared when he was in office, how can it be considered to be for consulting purposes?That was for his consulting business where it would be legitimate to accept payments into your bank accounts.
Unrelated to cash for access payments Trudeau is accused of.
So you failed in your example.
Even if I were to accept your example, it does not help you.
It means you'd be saying that there are no corrupt politicians, just because they dont receive money directly into their chequing accounts.
They are mainly Sikhs who are protesting for this Khalistan State. There maybe a tiny minority who are not Sikhs but agree with their cause.The ones protesting are not all Sikhs.
You are the one doing the lumping.
He declared it and I am not qualified to comment on tax declarations or associated business complexities.If it was not declared in his tax returns or declared when he was in office, how can it be considered to be for consulting purposes?
Red Herring.Again you have not proven that any money for The Trudeau Foundation was for Justin's personal account or personal means!!