You and Frankfooter seem to be talking about Modi.
I am talking about Trudeau and his stupidity and his ulterior motives.
I did watch the entire testimony.
Last edited:
Trudeau harming relations between India and Canada?
- Thread starter canada-man
- Start date
I am talking about Trudeau and his stupidity and his ulterior motives.
I did watch the entire testimony.
'at that time'
Trudeau Admits Canada "Had No Proof" Against India in Nijjar's Killing | Subscribe to Firstpost
Trudeau Admits Canada "Had No Proof" Against India in Nijjar's Killing | Subscribe to FirstpostCanadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has admitted that his ...www.youtube.com
Do you have proof that they don't have that evidence now, which is why this story has escalated?
Why are you so interested in exonerating Modi?
Trudeau would have been coached by CSIS and lawyers to be very careful about what he's allowed to say publicly without clearance.
So lets look at the facts:
On Oct 12 - 13, there was a meeting that ended with the Indian government not being persuaded to co-operate with Canada. India said no evidence was given.
This breaks down to 2 possible things: Canada had no new evidence, or they had new evidence but it wasn't enough for India.
So as of now they have not shown anything to win their claim.
Now here is the thing not to lose sight of. Canada is asking India to waive diplomatic immunity to further investigations. This right here shows Canada has weak evidence to begin with.
What is different today?
Trudeau has not said he has any new evidence today.
Trudeau wasn't the one being interviewed at CTV.
Was talking about Indian diplomats, not the CPC.
You want him to break the law and reveal CSIS reports publicly?
Why is this about Trudeau? Singh and May all having read the reports and agree.
Why are you not talking about PeePee's partying being named and his refusal to get clearance to find out who is named and for what?
Trudeau said he has no evidence, so nothing to present or break laws.
As for CPC, provide the report to someone within CPC with security clearance.
Why doesn't he?
Elizabeth May read the reports and said naming names puts people's lives at risk.
Even if another con has security clearance to read the report they are not allowed to tell PeePee.
Why won't PeePee get clearance to find out who in his party is using foreign interference?
Where is he hiding?
That is a legal matter to be advised on by CPC lawyers.
So why not?
Maybe because its advantageous to finger point than to act?
No, its illegal to share those reports to someone without clearance.
PeePee had clearance previously, why won't he get it now?
Where is he hiding?
The whole thing quite simply shows that India, with Trudeau and his cosplay/photo-op antics, coupled with the world thinking his is a joke, decided that they could do what they liked on our soil and then laugh about it.
More serious respected PM would have resulted in second thoughts on this as not being viable. Thecourting of this vote and looking the other way on security concerns with a few members of it resulted in reckless behavior on the part of the separatists and this response.
I obviously don't condone India's action. I in fact would have considered invoking NATO on this to push for an apology and the return of conspirators to Canada for trial. As well as suspending all visas etc. And made sure to use the Internet to tell India's citizens why.
But when you are a clown, people don't take you seriously.
More serious respected PM would have resulted in second thoughts on this as not being viable. Thecourting of this vote and looking the other way on security concerns with a few members of it resulted in reckless behavior on the part of the separatists and this response.
I obviously don't condone India's action. I in fact would have considered invoking NATO on this to push for an apology and the return of conspirators to Canada for trial. As well as suspending all visas etc. And made sure to use the Internet to tell India's citizens why.
But when you are a clown, people don't take you seriously.
I am asking why doesn't he share it with someone at the CPC with security clearance?
What that someone tells Pierre can be legally advised by CPC lawyers.
So why not?
NATO wont play ball.
Several NATO countries have billions of dollars in trade with India. Too much to lose over Sikhs.
He should have done 3 things imo.
Stepped up domestic security so any foreign actors are stopped while cracking down on criminal gangs.
Presented concrete evidence such that India couldn't refute.
Stopped encouraging separatists to use Canada as a safe haven to conduct cross border campaigns against another nation.
Especially one that is a close trade partner and a growing world power.
Very shabbily managed situation overall.
Because legally they can't tell PeePee.
Not until he gets clearance.
Why won't he?
Where is he hiding?
They cannot share classified information.
But they can confirm what May, Trudeau and Singh publicly have.
That would ensure that all have read it and are saying the same thing.
So why not?
Exactly, why hasn't that happened?
Why won't PeePee send someone with clearance in and why won't get clearance again to read it?
When it comes to assassination by nations they will wake up. Suddenly if Africsn nations start doing it in France, Belgium, Germany etc. I don't include the USA because no one with brains will fuck with that.
You call them privately, tell them that they need to step up. If Trudeau had any world cred he could've gotten it. Then India gets the message and either backs off, or if they go ahead, they have to burn their operatives, and take the hit.
You are using Modi's arguments and line of thoughts in this whole argument!!
Do you think that Canada did not expel these 6 diplomats?
This Indian High Commission Verma who was expelled, was also interviewed by Vassy Kapelos. Watch the interview and see how he tries to make up excuses that were hollow and later rebutted by the Canadian High Commissioner of India Cameron McKay. Canada had co-operated with India in the past for the extradition of those that were under investigation in India. But Modi was the one now who is betraying Canada in its investigation, especially when evidence WAS AVAILABLE IF INDIA WANTS IT. THEY DON'T WANT IT!!
Indian high commissioner accuses Trudeau of destroying bilateral relationship, says 'mistrust' persists
India's high commissioner to Canada — who has been expelled from the country — says while the economic relationship between Canada and India will likely be preserved, the political one is now characterized by 'mistrust.'
www.ctvnews.ca
Last edited:
