Allegra Escorts Collective

Trudeau harming relations between India and Canada?

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
30,348
8,354
113
He repeatedly said they were recalled.
Then someone at CTV texted him and he changed his tune.
Just like the Indian press is pro-Modi, the Canadian press is pro-Trudeau.
They probably texted him as he was making a mistake by stating that India "Recalls" their diplomats. He was referring to the India News Outlets at the start. That is why he corrected himself later in the video!! India did not "Recall" them, and all they did was to refuse to waive the Immunity. Once again India's Press are being subjected to censorship and have to toe the line!!

Watch this video at the 4 minute mark of Trudeau testifying at the foreign Interference Enquiry. Then again listen to Trudeau mention that the RCMP had "Real Evidence" of the Violence towards Canadians that the Indian Govt. directed. this fact was towards the end of the video!!


Obviously, the video that you are quoting is not the most recent one as it was from probably the time during the G20 Summit in India after it was brought to Modi's attention and he waved it off then!! But post the whole context of when that video was published. In fact it could have even been "doctored" as only the Indian Media are broadcasting it!!
 
Last edited:

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
37,287
75,822
113
It is not for me to define what is acceptable.
But we can see the results and what his ulterior motives are here.
Which is to distract.
Got it.
You don't care what evidence there is or isn't or what he presents.
You just know it is about "distracting" and therefore bs.
(Do you even care what did or did not happen? Or is that entirely irrelevant to you?)
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
30,348
8,354
113
He repeatedly said they were recalled.
Then someone at CTV texted him and he changed his tune.
Just like the Indian press is pro-Modi, the Canadian press is pro-Trudeau.
That is not true. The Canadian Press like The Sun and National Post etc. have been constantly critical of the Trudeau Govt from Day 1 that he took office.
They are allowed to be so, without any censorship, unlike the Indian Press, where journalists have been jailed on false pretences!!

 
Last edited:

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
7,829
8,434
113
That is not true. The Canadian Press like The Sun and National Post etc. have been constantly critical of the Trudeau Govt from Day 1 that he took office.
They are allowed to be so, without any censorship, unlike the Indian Press, where journalist have been jailed on false pretences!!

Idk why you are so obsessed with Modi and the Indian press.
Worry about CTV doctoring videos and texting a reporter on air.
 

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
7,829
8,434
113
Again watch the video of the link in Post #279 at the 4 minute mark and at the very end where Trudeau testified that the RCMP had the Evidence!!
From your post 279:
“And at that point, it was primarily intelligence, not hard evidentiary proof. So we said, ‘Well, you know, let’s work together and look into your security services, and maybe we can get that done,”’ Trudeau said,....
Also what is Trudeau thinking telling the Indians, that "we can look into your security services"?
Which country will entertain this?
Its fucking stupid!
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
30,348
8,354
113
From your post 279:
“And at that point, it was primarily intelligence, not hard evidentiary proof. So we said, ‘Well, you know, let’s work together and look into your security services, and maybe we can get that done,”’ Trudeau said,....
Also what is Trudeau thinking telling the Indians, that "we can look into your security services"?
Which country will entertain this?
Its fucking stupid!
Obviously you did not watch the most recent video that was posted in #279:

What you are quoting was what Trudeau stated during this time:

Trudeau said Canada could have made things “uncomfortable” for Prime Minister Narendra Modi by going public with the allegations before the G20 summit in September 2023 in New Dehli.
Then earlier this year:

“In late July, early August, I was briefed on the fact that there was intelligence from Canada and possibly Five Eyes allies that made it fairly clear, credibly clear, that India was involved in this killing,” he said."
Then watch the video at the 4:30 Minute mark where Trudeau clearly stated that The RCMP had the Evidence. Of course you will not watch it!!

The pronunciations we made earlier this year and the Evidence that the RCMP determined as to the Violence against Canadians that has been enabled and directed by the Indian Government
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
30,348
8,354
113
Idk why you are so obsessed with Modi and the Indian press.
Worry about CTV doctoring videos and texting a reporter on air.
Obviously, you are the one obsessed with the CTV "doctoring" the video. Did you forget what is the title of this whole thread?
You are refusing to watch the whole video of Trudeau's testimony during the Foreign Interference Enquiry!!
But then you seem to adore Modi!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Valcazar

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
7,829
8,434
113
Obviously, you are the one obsessed with the CTV "doctoring" the video. Did you forget what is the title of this whole thread?
You are refusing to watch the whole video of Trudeau's testimony during the Foreign Interference Enquiry!!
But then you seem to adore Modi!!
You and Frankfooter seem to be talking about Modi.
I am talking about Trudeau and his stupidity and his ulterior motives.
I did watch the entire testimony.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: jimidean2011

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
103,295
29,655
113
  • Like
Reactions: bver_hunter

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
103,295
29,655
113
He repeatedly said they were recalled.
Then someone at CTV texted him and he changed his tune.
Just like the Indian press is pro-Modi, the Canadian press is pro-Trudeau.
Trudeau would have been coached by CSIS and lawyers to be very careful about what he's allowed to say publicly without clearance.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
103,295
29,655
113
From your post 279:
“And at that point, it was primarily intelligence, not hard evidentiary proof. So we said, ‘Well, you know, let’s work together and look into your security services, and maybe we can get that done,”’ Trudeau said,....
Also what is Trudeau thinking telling the Indians, that "we can look into your security services"?
Which country will entertain this?
Its fucking stupid!
That was years ago.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bver_hunter

DesRicardo

aka Dick Dastardly
Dec 2, 2022
4,214
4,562
113

Oct. 12-13: RCMP, Indian delegations meet in Singapore
RCMP Deputy Commissioner Mark Flynn went to Singapore on Oct. 12 to meet with Indian government officials and get them to co-operate with the investigation, said a senior government source.

He joined Trudeau's national security adviser Nathalie Drouin and deputy Foreign Affairs minister David Morrison, who were in the country to meet with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's national security adviser Ajit Doval.

India was asked to waive diplomatic and consular immunities and to co-operate in the investigation but "did not agree" to do so, says a statement from Global Affairs Canada.

Sources said that Indian officials asked for the meeting to remain confidential.

But as the Canadian delegation was on its way back to Ottawa, the Indian delegation leaked news of the meeting to Indian media and claimed that no police evidence was presented at the gathering, said a senior Canadian government source.
So lets look at the facts:

On Oct 12 - 13, there was a meeting that ended with the Indian government not being persuaded to co-operate with Canada. India said no evidence was given.

This breaks down to 2 possible things: Canada had no new evidence, or they had new evidence but it wasn't enough for India.

So as of now they have not shown anything to win their claim.

Now here is the thing not to lose sight of. Canada is asking India to waive diplomatic immunity to further investigations. This right here shows Canada has weak evidence to begin with.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
103,295
29,655
113
What is different today?
Trudeau has not said he has any new evidence today.
You want him to break the law and reveal CSIS reports publicly?
Why is this about Trudeau? Singh and May all having read the reports and agree.

Why are you not talking about PeePee's partying being named and his refusal to get clearance to find out who is named and for what?
 
  • Like
Reactions: bver_hunter

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
7,829
8,434
113
You want him to break the law and reveal CSIS reports publicly?
Why is this about Trudeau? Singh and May all having read the reports and agree.

Why are you not talking about PeePee's partying being named and his refusal to get clearance to find out who is named and for what?
Trudeau said he has no evidence, so nothing to present or break laws.
As for CPC, provide the report to someone within CPC with security clearance.
Why doesn't he?
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts