Then consider me wildly stupid and explain it like I'm 5.It is unambiguous if you read my posts without jumping to conclusions.
What is he responsible for?He is still responsible.
Then consider me wildly stupid and explain it like I'm 5.It is unambiguous if you read my posts without jumping to conclusions.
What is he responsible for?He is still responsible.
Sure, someone else in the cons can be briefed.To add, There is nothing specifically stating that Poilievre needs to be the one receiving briefing.
CPC Lawyer explained anyone within the CPC with clearance can be briefed on this and have been briefed on other classified issue before. Trudeau is just twisting the truth.
It's just a trap to muzzle Poilievre.
You're mixing it up.CBC covered it better than I would.
Loading…
www.cbc.ca
OK, so your issue is that you can't accuse a country without presenting evidence.You're mixing it up.
Trudeau said India was involved in Nijjar's killing.
He said India was using criminal gangs in Canada to do their dirty work.
Admitted no evidence for these, just intel.
If he is going to accuse a country, he has to present evidence.
It is not for me to say or accept.OK, so your issue is that you can't accuse a country without presenting evidence.
What kind of evidence is sufficient for you?
Is it, as I inferred, evidence available to a court of law, married to criminal charges?
Or is there some lesser standard you would accept?
So you just know Trudeau did it wrong, but have no actual opinion on what would be acceptable?It is not for me to say or accept.
It is not for me to define what is acceptable.So you just know Trudeau did it wrong, but have no actual opinion on what would be acceptable?
He was first quoting what the Indian Govt. claimed. Then he corrected himself. The fact is that Our own Govt. stated that they expelled these Diplomats.Singh is a big supporter of the Sikh movement, so he supports Trudeau.
Regarding the diplomats, watch this video here from CTV.
The reporter repeatedly says that India "RECALLED" the diplomats.
At the 3:30 mark, he gets a text message as he was in the middle of saying that India recalled their diplomats, and immediately changes his tune to say that Indian diplomats were expelled.
CTV was recently found to have doctored videos and issued public apologies.
What is likely to have happened is that India did infact recall its diplomats once Canada demanded that they waive diplomatic immunity.
CSIS and Five Eyes said India was involved in the killing, not just Trudeau. I know, you're a big Modi supporter so won't accept this.You're mixing it up.
Trudeau said India was involved in Nijjar's killing.
He said India was using criminal gangs in Canada to do their dirty work.
Admitted no evidence for these, just intel.
If he is going to accuse a country, he has to present evidence.
Otherwise they wont entertain him.
The other issue is with conservatives being under India's thumb.
Can't Trudeau, like DesRicardo said, release the names to someone within the CPC with security clearance as a threat reduction measure if he was so concerned?
His avoidance in all 3 cases means that he most likely wants to sabotage Pierre's campaign and distract from his issues.
Justin failed.So you just know Trudeau did it wrong, but have no actual opinion on what would be acceptable?
CSIS and Five Eyes, have intel. Not evidence. Trudeau admitted that.CSIS and Five Eyes said India was involved in the killing, not just Trudeau. I
How do you know its not evidence?CSIS and Five Eyes, have intel. Not evidence. Trudeau admitted that.
Trudeau is trying to sabotage Pierre and distract from his own failures.
He repeatedly said they were recalled.He was first quoting what the Indian Govt. claimed. Then he corrected himself.
How do you know its not evidence?
Where did Trudeau say there was no evidence.
They probably texted him as he was making a mistake by stating that India "Recalls" their diplomats. He was referring to the India News Outlets at the start. That is why he corrected himself later in the video!! India did not "Recall" them, and all they did was to refuse to waive the Immunity. Once again India's Press are being subjected to censorship and have to toe the line!!He repeatedly said they were recalled.
Then someone at CTV texted him and he changed his tune.
Just like the Indian press is pro-Modi, the Canadian press is pro-Trudeau.
Got it.It is not for me to define what is acceptable.
But we can see the results and what his ulterior motives are here.
Which is to distract.
Yes, he was saying something other than what they wanted him to say.They probably texted him as he was making a mistake....
That is not true. The Canadian Press like The Sun and National Post etc. have been constantly critical of the Trudeau Govt from Day 1 that he took office.He repeatedly said they were recalled.
Then someone at CTV texted him and he changed his tune.
Just like the Indian press is pro-Modi, the Canadian press is pro-Trudeau.
Again watch the video of the link in Post #279 at the 4 minute mark and at the very end where Trudeau testified that the RCMP had the Evidence!!Yes, he was saying something other than what they wanted him to say.