Trudeau harming relations between India and Canada?

richaceg

Well-known member
Feb 11, 2009
13,833
5,618
113
Trudeau is doing what he's supposed to do, investigate foreign interference and obey the secrecy laws.
His statements are under oath, if he's lying he could go to jail for it.

Then why is he implicating Peepee when this was under his watch? His pedaling back when Peepee called him out to release the names...all he has is grandstanding and throwing shit hoping one will stick...well nothing has stuck...he's still not improving his numbers and he's not looking good as the day goes by...
 
  • Like
Reactions: jimidean2011

boobtoucher

Well-known member
May 25, 2021
193
250
63
What you fail to understand is there is no proof presented to solidify this claim.

Are you expecting India to be like "OK, fine you got us."?

LIke I said earlier, America has video evidence, Canada has a list.

Hurrr durrr TURD-o isn't sharing top seekert information in public, even though it would make him look good. Uh, he must be lying guys. I mean, Mein Fuhrievre told me that he's lying, so I'm going to believe that. And it's not like other countries are ALSO presenting evidence that India is engaging in influence operations.

PP says I can be mad, so I'm going to do that. Bad Turdo made me try and not kill my neighbours. He's Hitler now.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,516
22,156
113
Then why is he implicating Peepee when this was under his watch? His pedaling back when Peepee called him out to release the names...all he has is grandstanding and throwing shit hoping one will stick...well nothing has stuck...he's still not improving his numbers and he's not looking good as the day goes by...
PeePee is the problem, he's compromise and can't get clearance, nor can he release the names because he's on the list.
 

DesRicardo

Well-known member
Dec 2, 2022
2,123
2,103
113
Hurrr durrr TURD-o isn't sharing top seekert information in public, even though it would make him look good. Uh, he must be lying guys. I mean, Mein Fuhrievre told me that he's lying, so I'm going to believe that. And it's not like other countries are ALSO presenting evidence that India is engaging in influence operations.

PP says I can be mad, so I'm going to do that. Bad Turdo made me try and not kill my neighbours. He's Hitler now.
Well apparently his top secret information isn't enough to sway India or formally charge any representative.

This is a wild goose chase and Trudeau's only hope is America can save him.

And somehow it's all Poilievre's fault. :rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Reactions: jimidean2011

silentkisser

Master of Disaster
Jun 10, 2008
4,268
5,344
113
What you fail to understand is there is no proof presented to solidify this claim.

Are you expecting India to be like "OK, fine you got us."?

LIke I said earlier, America has video evidence, Canada has a list.
Here's the thing: The intelligence they shared with India is probably pretty damning, but gives them the ability to disavow what happened. They could have said it was a rogue agent or something, quietly appolgized, and we probably wouldn't hear any more of it. Trudeau was trying to keep it on the down low, but the Globe got the story and was going to publish it....so that was when Trudeau went public last year. The RCMP has flushed out more info and details about the plot....


Also, we will likely not get the information about what exactly what this intelligence is or what it says, but we do know the Five Eyes helped develop the intel. We also know that the UK supports Canada in this. Which means they believe India did something. Heck, they might have been the source of the intelligence. The fact that they also tried to assassinate someone on US soil gives Trudeau's claims a hell of a lot more power. I mean, if India would risk doing that in the US, they sure as fuck would do it in Canada (or the UK/Australia).
 

boobtoucher

Well-known member
May 25, 2021
193
250
63
Well apparently his top secret information isn't enough to sway India or formally charge any representative.

This is a wild goose chase and Trudeau's only hope is America can save him.

And somehow it's all Poilievre's fault. :rolleyes:
I hope you're warming up properly before all this effort to bend the narrative.

What's that thing that diplomats have? The thing that would prevent a country from charging them? Diplomatic Resistance to Being Charged? Something like that.

.

Literally all we could do is expel them. Which we did.
 

DesRicardo

Well-known member
Dec 2, 2022
2,123
2,103
113
Here's the thing: The intelligence they shared with India is probably pretty damning, but gives them the ability to disavow what happened. They could have said it was a rogue agent or something, quietly appolgized, and we probably wouldn't hear any more of it. Trudeau was trying to keep it on the down low, but the Globe got the story and was going to publish it....so that was when Trudeau went public last year. The RCMP has flushed out more info and details about the plot....


Also, we will likely not get the information about what exactly what this intelligence is or what it says, but we do know the Five Eyes helped develop the intel. We also know that the UK supports Canada in this. Which means they believe India did something. Heck, they might have been the source of the intelligence. The fact that they also tried to assassinate someone on US soil gives Trudeau's claims a hell of a lot more power. I mean, if India would risk doing that in the US, they sure as fuck would do it in Canada (or the UK/Australia).
Jesus. No country would every admit and try to apologize for assassinating your citizen.

Don't forget, these are diplomats they are trying to investigate. They are not ordinary visitors, which is why all this fell apart on Oct 13 and Trudeau is trying to save face. This isn't the only national security issues, it's just the deadliest.

The RCMP won't flush much more imo, it's really all up to America. But they have their own interest which is why the America-India investigation is going much smoother.
 

DesRicardo

Well-known member
Dec 2, 2022
2,123
2,103
113
I hope you're warming up properly before all this effort to bend the narrative.

What's that thing that diplomats have? The thing that would prevent a country from charging them? Diplomatic Resistance to Being Charged? Something like that.

.

Literally all we could do is expel them. Which we did.
I know this. That's why this is a wild goose chase. GET IT NOW???
 
  • Like
Reactions: jimidean2011

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
1,618
1,144
113
I think you miss the key point here: HE WAS ASSASSINATED IN CANADA BY A FOREIGN POWER! It doesn't matter that it took time for his citizenship. It doesn't matter that he was doing something that pissed off the Indian government, but did not violate Canadian law. It doesn't matter if he is leading an alleged "militant group." The bottom line here is that he was murdered by a decree from India.

The excuses and denial reek of one of two things: Either your hatred of Trudeau has clouded your view, or you just don't care that a brown person was murdered. Hell, maybe it's a bit of both. And, for you questioning what happened, like this is something the Liberals made up...this is really going to blow your fucking mind:
Look the guy may or may not be guilty of illegal activities.
India alleges he is. Canada calls him a good citizen, even though a brief look through of his history proves quite the contrary.
So Trudeau has to present proof for this allegation that he was assassinated by agents of India in the first place.
He has not presented that proof and testified that he has intel and not evidentiary proof.
The Americans charged someone for a murder for hire plot. Great.
So do that with whoever you think is guilty here.
But Trudeau has not done that and instead just keeps talking.
Are you saying I should take King Dustbin Fraudeau at his word or else? :)
 

silentkisser

Master of Disaster
Jun 10, 2008
4,268
5,344
113
Look the guy may or may not be guilty of illegal activities.
India alleges he is. Canada calls him a good citizen, even though a brief look through of his history proves quite the contrary.
So Trudeau has to present proof for this allegation that he was assassinated by agents of India in the first place.
He has not presented that proof and testified that he has intel and not evidentiary proof.
The Americans charged someone for a murder for hire plot. Great.
So do that with whoever you think is guilty here.
But Trudeau has not done that and instead just keeps talking.
Are you saying I should take King Dustbin Fraudeau at his word or else? :)
Basically....yes. Trudeau, I think most of us would agree, is not the sharpest tool in the shed. But, I don't think for one second that he would just accuse India of anything without a high level of confidence from CSIS/RCMP and intel from the Five Eyes. And, if I recall correctly, when he originally approached India, it was to ask for cooperation in rooting out this plot. He didn't pigeonhole Modi and shout at him for bringing death to Canada's shores. He didn't make a scene or wild accusations. India basically told him to fuck off....and more stuff happened behind the scenes diplomatically.
 

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
1,618
1,144
113
Jesus. No country would every admit and try to apologize for assassinating your citizen.
Absolutely.
Trudeau was summarizing his conversation with India and he said that he told them that "we'd work together" to investigate his allegations.
How naive!
How can one expect another country to respond positively when you are there blaming them for something without evidence? :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: DesRicardo

Shaquille Oatmeal

Well-known member
Jun 2, 2023
1,618
1,144
113
Basically....yes. Trudeau, I think most of us would agree, is not the sharpest tool in the shed. But, I don't think for one second that he would just accuse India of anything without a high level of confidence from CSIS/RCMP and intel from the Five Eyes. And, if I recall correctly, when he originally approached India, it was to ask for cooperation in rooting out this plot. He didn't pigeonhole Modi and shout at him for bringing death to Canada's shores. He didn't make a scene or wild accusations. India basically told him to fuck off....and more stuff happened behind the scenes diplomatically.
No country would entertain an accusation without evidence.
It is naive to think otherwise.
And Trudeau's confidence does not mean much because I am sure the Indians are just as confident in their defence of their own diplomats and agencies.
 

DesRicardo

Well-known member
Dec 2, 2022
2,123
2,103
113
Absolutely.
Trudeau was summarizing his conversation with India and he said that he told them that "we'd work together" to investigate his allegations.
How naive!
How can one expect another country to respond positively when you are there blaming them for something without evidence? :)
Justin thinks he can talk to world leaders and officials like a high school guidance counsellor.

He's out of his league.
 

Vapoure

Member
Aug 27, 2024
38
23
18
I agree with you.
But Trudeau says he has no hard evidentiary proof.
In the absence of proof this seems like an attack on Pierre than defending Canadian sovereignty which just seems like an excuse coming from him.
Quite the contrary. The RCMP has done a thorough investigation and has the evidence.
 

Insidious Von

My head is my home
Sep 12, 2007
39,830
7,312
113
Its very simple.

Indian Secret Service Agents have been operating in Canada since Air India Flight 182 went down, Trudeau wants them out. It's going to be extremely difficult, RAW (Indian external intelligence service) is ingrained into Canadian society. The Sikhs can't help him either, they're to busy fighting among themselves. My nephews truck was stolen a week ago, I have a fairly solid idea whom the culprit is.

 
Toronto Escorts