Trudeau harming relations between India and Canada?

[canada-man]

DAFUQ!





The U.S. Justice Department announced criminal charges against an Indian government employee Thursday in connection with a foiled plot to kill a Sikh separatist leader living in New York City.

Vikash Yadav remains at large but faces murder-for-hire charges in federal court.

The criminal case was announced the same week as two members of an Indian inquiry committee investigating the plot were in Washington to meet with U.S. officials about the investigation.

“The Justice Department will be relentless in holding accountable any person — regardless of their position or proximity to power — who seeks to harm and silence American citizens,” Attorney General Merrick Garland said in a statement announcing the charges.

U.S. charges Indian government employee in foiled murder-for-hire plot - National | Globalnews.ca

The charges come days after Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and police officials went public with allegations that Indian diplomats were targeting Sikh separatists in Canada.

globalnews.ca

 

[DesRicardo]

The US have video evidence. Canada just has a "list".

 

[bver_hunter]

I don't suppose they could be lying could they princess?

Dumb and dumber question. Of course India are lying and you buy it!!

 

[bver_hunter]

Guess there will be excuses for this one as well:

US charges Indian government employee in foiled Sikh separatist murder plot
Case revolves around what the US says was an attempt to kill a prominent Sikh separatist leader, Gurpatwant Singh Pannun.

US charges Indian government employee in foiled Sikh separatist murder plot

Case revolves around what the US says was an attempt to kill prominent Sikh separatist leader, Gurpatwant Singh Pannun.

www.aljazeera.com

 

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

Of course India are lying and you buy it!!

So you must have the evidence that Trudeau himself says he does not have then?

 

[bver_hunter]

So you must have the evidence that Trudeau himself says he does not have then?

He did not say that he "Does Not Have" the evidence. Again are the Canadian Police bullshitting when they are the ones to admit that they have the evidence?

 

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

He did not say that he "Does Not Have" the evidence. Again are the Canadian Police bullshitting when they are the ones to admit that they have the evidence?

Trudeau said what he has is intel and not hard evidentiary proof in the sworn testimony.
Yes I believe the RCMP is playing right into India's hands by being vague.
They need to come clean.

 

[bver_hunter]

Trudeau said what he has is intel and not hard evidentiary proof in the sworn testimony.
Yes I believe the RCMP is playing right into India's hands by being vague.
They need to come clean.

The RCMP wont come out and publicly disclose such allegations if they do not have the real proof.
We know that the Indian Press have to support Modi or face the consequences. But again if the Indian Govt are co-operating with the USA, then why can they not do so with Canada, when the actual evidence is being offered to them? All they have to do is come to the table and see it for themselves. Am certain that it is rock hard evidence that will be made public later on.
Why is Pee Pee not getting the security clearance, whereas Jagmeet Singh on the other hand is calling for more action against the Indian Govt. as he has been privy to this evidence!!

 

[DesRicardo]

Trudeau has some of you guys on a wild goose chase.

This grandstanding will blow up right back in his face. I'm watching some of the clips and he's getting grilled. Don't let MSM fool you, he's looking dumb on the stand.

 

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

The RCMP wont come out and publicly disclose such allegations if they do not have the real proof.

So they dont have proof which is what Trudeau admitted.
So why will any country entertain this?
The Americans charged someone which requires some preliminary evidence.
Trudeau hasn't.

 

[Valcazar]

See, now here's my point. The supreme court absolutely did not state it was an illegal action.

1: A federal judge said it was unjustified. This is under appeal. The supreme court has not commented.
2: Chris barber is now suing, based on the ruling from the federal judge
3: Barber and Lich's trials have wrapped up, but the judgement has not come back.

They have their narrative, they aren't going to change it for facts.

 

[maurice93]

Did you listen to Trudeau's testimony?
Trudeau specifically said there was no evidence.
Trudeau said it was primarily intelligence not hard evidentiary proof.
Listen to first 20 seconds.

Testimony at these hearings tend to take a situation start at the beginning and then move forward to the current day.

Are you sure that in that clip, he is responding to a question as the situation stands today (on October 15, 2024 after the RCMP presser) or is he responding to a question as to how the evidence was during 2023 when he rose the situation in the HOC -- or perhaps even earlier then that Because the evidence levels at the two points were different and the responses should be different. If Trudeau is responding to a question based on how things stood in 2023 instead of 2024, its extremely dishonest to then report it as a comment about the evidence levels today..

So did you listen to the whole testimony?
Are you 100% certain this was related to the situation of today and not 2023?
Or are you relying on a twitter account who would have an agenda to take a comment totally out of context. Let's be honest it happens all the time, left/right, various countries here and abroad.

As an aside, I'm neither a PP or JT stan. I just dislike comments being taken out of context.

 

[DesRicardo]

Guys, the show is over. Unless he provides the proof, this will all go nowhere. All that is left is to hope America save his ass.

He doesn't know what he's doing. He never has. If you are travelling to and from India, please be safe.

 

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

Testimony at these hearings tend to take a situation start at the beginning and then move forward to the current day.

Are you sure that in that clip, he is responding to a question as the situation stands today (on October 15, 2024 after the RCMP presser) or is he responding to a question as to how the evidence was during 2023 when he rose the situation in the HOC -- or perhaps even earlier then that Because the evidence levels at the two points were different and the responses should be different. If Trudeau is responding to a question based on how things stood in 2023 instead of 2024, its extremely dishonest to then report it as a comment about the evidence levels today..

So did you listen to the whole testimony?
Are you 100% certain this was related to the situation of today and not 2023?
Or are you relying on a twitter account who would have an agenda to take a comment totally out of context. Let's be honest it happens all the time, left/right, various countries here and abroad.

So what is different today?

 

[DesRicardo]

And don't let him fool you on National security. Trudeau is the one that let Nijjar's killers in the country. On student visas may I add.

Loading…

www.cbc.ca

 

[maurice93]

So what is different today?

The RCMP in October 2024 explicitly stated they had been obtaining evidence and proof.

Did the RCMP make that pronouncement in 2023 or earlier? Over time info is gathered. It's not just gathered on one date. That should be obvious.

If somebody asks a question on the evidence situation in 2023 (or before), and it is then reported as how the person sees the evidence situation as of today, how can that not be anything but dishonest?

 

[Shaquille Oatmeal]

The RCMP in October 2024 explicitly stated they had been obtaining evidence and proof.

Did the RCMP make that pronouncement in 2023 or earlier? Over time info is gathered. It's not just gathered on one date. That should be obvious.

If somebody asks you a question on the situation in 2023 (or before), and you then report it as how the person sees the situation as of today, how can that not be anything but dishonest?

Its different things.
The 2023 allegation was about the Sikh guy's shooting.
The 2024 statement is about proof of Indian government involvement in criminal activities.
You are mixing up the two.
In either case no proof has been shared with anyone.
Trudeau seems hell bent on exposing the CPC and their connections with India more than anything else.

 

[Frankfooter]

Its different things.
The 2023 allegation was about the Sikh guy's shooting.
The 2024 statement is about proof of Indian government involvement in criminal activities.
You are mixing up the two.
In either case no proof has been shared with anyone.
Trudeau seems hell bent on exposing the CPC and their connections with India more than anything else.

Trudeau is doing what he's supposed to do, investigate foreign interference and obey the secrecy laws.
His statements are under oath, if he's lying he could go to jail for it.

Loading…

www.cbc.ca

 

[silentkisser]

The story goes that he applied for refugee status in the 90s and was denied.
Then he was denied a 2nd time due to fraud.
Then eventually became citizen in 2007.
You are painting him as if he was a law abiding good citizen of Canada.
He was not. If he was so good why did he allegedly lead a militant group in Canada? Is that not illegal?
That doesn't mean India gets a license to kill but there are 3 sides to every story.
Trudeau's motives here are questionable.

I think you miss the key point here: HE WAS ASSASSINATED IN CANADA BY A FOREIGN POWER! It doesn't matter that it took time for his citizenship. It doesn't matter that he was doing something that pissed off the Indian government, but did not violate Canadian law. It doesn't matter if he is leading an alleged "militant group." The bottom line here is that he was murdered by a decree from India.

The excuses and denial reek of one of two things: Either your hatred of Trudeau has clouded your view, or you just don't care that a brown person was murdered. Hell, maybe it's a bit of both. And, for you questioning what happened, like this is something the Liberals made up...this is really going to blow your fucking mind:

U.S. charges Indian government employee in foiled murder-for-hire plot - National | Globalnews.ca

The charges come days after Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and police officials went public with allegations that Indian diplomats were targeting Sikh separatists in Canada.

globalnews.ca

 

[DesRicardo]

I think you miss the key point here: HE WAS ASSASSINATED IN CANADA BY A FOREIGN POWER! It doesn't matter that it took time for his citizenship. It doesn't matter that he was doing something that pissed off the Indian government, but did not violate Canadian law. It doesn't matter if he is leading an alleged "militant group." The bottom line here is that he was murdered by a decree from India.

The excuses and denial reek of one of two things: Either your hatred of Trudeau has clouded your view, or you just don't care that a brown person was murdered. Hell, maybe it's a bit of both. And, for you questioning what happened, like this is something the Liberals made up...this is really going to blow your fucking mind:

U.S. charges Indian government employee in foiled murder-for-hire plot - National | Globalnews.ca

The charges come days after Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and police officials went public with allegations that Indian diplomats were targeting Sikh separatists in Canada.

globalnews.ca

What you fail to understand is there is no proof presented to solidify this claim.

Are you expecting India to be like "OK, fine you got us."?

LIke I said earlier, America has video evidence, Canada has a list.