NBC does the same to Trump. Like when he said protest peacefully yet they edit that part out.CTV got caught editing a video of Poillievre. Clearly they are in Trudeau's corner.
They had to issue a public apology on twitter.
The 2 journalists were fired
The messengers are always scapegoats paid or not.
I know, I know.
That same tenaglia along with cry baby Shauna hunt lied on a tourist who was with a camera in a public park a few years ago.Turns out one of the reporters is that fat cow who used to work for CP24, Cristina Tenaglia
macdonaldlaurier.ca
you mean like the sheep that still believe Fox News even after they paid $750 million in fines for false news and testified that they were just "entertainment"?
Pee Pee along with Sheer and the right wing group is trying to take a page out of Donald THE FELON Trump's playbook.More information has come out, and while it is a major fuck up for CTV, this had nothing to do with them "lying for Trudeau."
It is more of how CTV cut out veteran leaders in the newsroom, and an attempt to make the clip keep context by making it shorter....and then someone else re-edited it and it removed the context. Here is the run down of what happened, according to this column in the Star:
I found out what really happened between Pierre Poilievre and CTV. The real story was even more depressing than the lie
The Conservative leader exploited a genuine journalistic error for partisan gain. The real tragedy of the story is what Bell did next.www.thestar.com
The narrative starts on the morning of Sunday, Sept. 22, when CTV reporter Cristina Tenaglia, in Toronto, and Derek Thacker, a video editor in Ottawa, started working together on an item for that night’s CTV National News broadcast. The piece was based partly on an interview that Procurement Minister Jean-Yves Duclos did on CTV’s Question Period, which aired that day, in which he warned that if the NDP did not vote with the government, it would jeopardize a plan to provide dental care to low-income Canadians.
At 11:30 a.m., Tenaglia, who is known to be a stickler for details, sent Thacker an “elements list” that included a clip from Poilievre, in which he said: “That’s why it’s time to put forward a motion for a carbon tax election.” But there was a problem — a 1.5-second blank spot — in the video clip on CTV’s server. Thacker, a 37-year veteran, widely regarded as a talented and resourceful editor, found a way to save the clip, by cutting out “it’s time,” and inserting a phrase from a similar sentence later in the same scrum, “we need.” The new clip was therefore: “That’s why we need to put forward a motion for a carbon tax election.”
That seemed fine. The sense of the sentence was the same. Later in the editing process, though, the last few words, where Poilievre mentioned the carbon tax election, were trimmed, apparently to save time.
On their own, either of those two edits would be defensible. But taken together they created a problem. The final piece left viewers with the false impression that Poilievre was bringing a motion aimed at blocking a dental program.
Basically, it was a major fuck up, but it was not done with the intention of trying to paint PP in a negative light.
Yeah, the backlash was quite something. And the anger they stoked was misplaced but effective. I mean, CTV is not a Liberal loving news organization. Remember, Mike Duffy sank Stephane Dion by airing a video clip where he couldn't hear or understand what a remote interviewer was asking, making him look foolish.
ah yes...the usual excuses right on queue. Everything is always an "accident" or someone "misspoke", etc.More information has come out, and while it is a major fuck up for CTV, this had nothing to do with them "lying for Trudeau."
It is more of how CTV cut out veteran leaders in the newsroom, and an attempt to make the clip keep context by making it shorter....and then someone else re-edited it and it removed the context. Here is the run down of what happened, according to this column in the Star:
I found out what really happened between Pierre Poilievre and CTV. The real story was even more depressing than the lie
The Conservative leader exploited a genuine journalistic error for partisan gain. The real tragedy of the story is what Bell did next.
The narrative starts on the morning of Sunday, Sept. 22, when CTV reporter Cristina Tenaglia, in Toronto, and Derek Thacker, a video editor in Ottawa, started working together on an item for that night’s CTV National News broadcast. The piece was based partly on an interview that Procurement Minister Jean-Yves Duclos did on CTV’s Question Period, which aired that day, in which he warned that if the NDP did not vote with the government, it would jeopardize a plan to provide dental care to low-income Canadians.
At 11:30 a.m., Tenaglia, who is known to be a stickler for details, sent Thacker an “elements list” that included a clip from Poilievre, in which he said: “That’s why it’s time to put forward a motion for a carbon tax election.” But there was a problem — a 1.5-second blank spot — in the video clip on CTV’s server. Thacker, a 37-year veteran, widely regarded as a talented and resourceful editor, found a way to save the clip, by cutting out “it’s time,” and inserting a phrase from a similar sentence later in the same scrum, “we need.” The new clip was therefore: “That’s why we need to put forward a motion for a carbon tax election.”
That seemed fine. The sense of the sentence was the same. Later in the editing process, though, the last few words, where Poilievre mentioned the carbon tax election, were trimmed, apparently to save time.
On their own, either of those two edits would be defensible. But taken together they created a problem. The final piece left viewers with the false impression that Poilievre was bringing a motion aimed at blocking a dental program.
Basically, it was a major fuck up, but it was not done with the intention of trying to paint PP in a negative light.
Dude, I've worked in newsrooms and at CTV on the weekend in the past. Believe me when I say this, a mistake like that can happen. They are usually caught and fixed before they air. I never liked splicing a clip together because of that reason, even when it made the clip shorter (which is very important in television). CTV is a shit show right now because they got rid of almost all of their senior leaders in the newsroom. Now, I cannot say what was in the hearts and minds of the reporter and editor, but I can tell you that how it happened is the most likely scenario. CTV has a journalistic ethics code that spells out and bans the use of taking clips out of context, and that's probably why they bot were fired.
Would you come to the defence of FoxNews if they made a similar mistake??
