Uncommitted make a reasonable argument that withholding their votes is the best option. Their public announcement that they are withholdiing votes is making maximum use of the situation to give that small group the possible ability to keep Harris from office if she continues to back the genocide and the information from the poll we discussed.Starting post 124.
But if this is just a mis-interpretation, then fine.
We just disagree about what is effective pressure - which is what this disagreement has been about from the start.
Yes.
You don't understand the voting system, and voting Green is ineffective pressure that will not deliver the results you want.
They can change the election.
They can put a party into power that will actively make their goals harder to achieve.
Whether or not someone understands the reality of the limits of the pressure they can bring to bear is important in politics.
Uncommitted Mvmt. Won’t Back Presidential Candidate as U.S. Keeps Arming Israel
The U.S. presidential election is just 45 days away, and for antiwar voters, the policy differences between the two leading candidates are vanishingly thin. As the Biden-Harris administration continues to supply billions of dollars in military aid to Israel, the Uncommitted National Movement...www.democracynow.org
That makes this one of the most effective chances for political pressure in a long time, a large enough group to swing the election with votes she can regain if she supports a ceasefire.
This puts all the pressure on Harris, she is being given the choice to change policy or possibly lose the election.