The Great Debate
- Thread starter Big Rig
- Start date
Behavior Analysis Experts EXPOSE Moderator Bias Against Trump in Tonight's Debate
@DrPhil
's guests bring the receipts. 1. “There was clearly a bias against Trump in their faces.” 2. Scott Rouse observed that Trump’s microphone was louder, making him appear aggressive. 3. Trump was “fact-checked” by moderators during his responses, while Harris's statements were left largely unchallenged. 4. Moderators frequently spoke over Trump as he tried to complete his answers. 5. Greg Hartley noticed that Trump received more questions with a negative framing, while Harris was given more neutral or "softball" questions. Overall, he called the moderators' treatment of Trump “a little heavy-handed at times.”
Full Debate Analysis: Trump won convincingly, had a strong performance, despite going into a 3-1 debate against the moderators. However, Kamala did not bomb, and did enough to keep her campaign alive. The story of the debate is ABC showing their blatant bias in favor of Kamala, and weaponized their “fact-checks” solely at Trump. They let Kamala lie unchecked about everything from the Project 2025 hoax, to the Charlottesville hoax, and everything in between. The ABC moderators showed a clear and obvious hostility towards Trump, that they did not show towards Kamala, and in many cases, teed Kamala up to bash Trump with prepared talking points. It is now abundantly clear why Kamala refused to accept the debate on Fox News, because her campaign knew she would receive preferential treatment on ABC. Kamala also was well-rehearsed, which is unlike her, almost as if she had the questions given to her ahead of time. If ABC were willing to be adversarial towards Trump, why would they stop there? Why wouldn’t they give Kamala the questions? ABC (Disney) just confirmed on national TV, that they are in bed with the DNC, and given their war-like posture towards Trump, I think it’s safe to assume Kamala’s campaign were made aware of the questions before hand. With all that being said, Trump got the viral moments of the night, stuck to his gameplan, and brushed off the endless lies and repeated attacks, from both Kamala and the moderators. Kamala’s optics were terrible, with her constant smirking, making faces, emotional responses, and monotone phony tone. And Trump refused to let her get her viral moment. Kamala’s gameplan was to appear more moderate, and blame Trump for all the problems she and Biden created over the last 4 years, but anyone who has been paying attention saw this for what it was. Given Kamala held her own and did not implode, we can expect the compromised MSM to claim Kamala won, and the headlines will be about Trump talking about Haitians eating pets. However, the viral internet clips will belong to Trump. Overall, Kamala did not gain any ground, Trump put on a solid performance, and the public got to see the MSM are clearly engaged in election interference in favor of the Dems. Net positive for Trump
If Kamala had won that debate tonight, her staff wouldn’t have rushed her away and called in Taylor Swift. Everyone knows ABC execs have donated to
@KamalaHarris
’s campaign and they know the media lied and ran cover for her during the debate. Now there’s speculation that
@KamalaHarris
was wearing earrings that were actually a listening device. The American people know what’s genuine vs what’s FAKE.
Her turf? Trump got 6 minutes more talking time ( but of course he just filled it with repeating the same dire warnings about the evil migrants . Why did they allow his mic back on when he continually rebutted her comments, but she never got the same chance to answer his lies? The moderators were weak and allowed Trump to babble on and on, but that only showed him to be a babbling fool, jumping from topic to topic.
bullshit... Trump had 6 minutes more air time and interjected numerous unscripted rebuttals where ABC turned his mic back on and let him ramble on. Kamala did not get that luxury.
Yep it’s a good opportunity to study the ultra right diarrhea
Soylent Green, Edward G Robinson's last film. He turned Charlton Heston into a megastar with The Ten Commandments - apart from Chuckie believing that very small rocks float in water.
If Mitchy is to be believed, The King of Kings went Fargo on Kamala Harris.
Why on earth to folks get their news that is fake from X etc. Probably from the $10m from Russia to appear legitimate from the US to support Trump and provide false information about Harris. Many audio experts have discredited this fake post:
Example:
High-resolution pictures of Harris, taken while delivering remarks to NCAA championship teams (see above), taken earlier this year show her wearing the same earrings which can clearly be identified as not a pair of the clip-on Nova H1 Audio Earrings.
While it's possible to claim that the earrings have been modified, with the Nova H1's frame being swapped out, it's this part of the device that houses the electronics, which would leave only the pearl behind.
Did Kamala Harris wear these Nova H1 Audio Earrings during the presidential debate?
One of CES 2023's coolest gadgets returns to the limelight for all the wrong reasons
www.laptopmag.com
Civilized debate is great I love a good debate but when some redneck extremist comes on here and insults my country and demeans woman? That's a different story
Trump, as usual, looked horrible from what i saw. What’s with the dog and cat eating?
