So they mention allegations that have never been proven, but they never agree with the allegations.What an idiotic post, Shazi.
The Lancet letter refers directly to the ICJ charges of genocide which are against Israel.
So they mention allegations that have never been proven, but they never agree with the allegations.What an idiotic post, Shazi.
The Lancet letter refers directly to the ICJ charges of genocide which are against Israel.
You have no class, Shazi.You're not too bright, are you? Try to keep up with the rest of the class.
Moronic.Refers.
Unfortunately for you, neither the Lancet or the letter actually says or refers that Israel is responsible for any deaths.
If that's your line of defence at the ICC and ICJ, then Israel is done.So they mention allegations that have never been proven, but they never agree with the allegations.
And you are a Shazi.You are a buffoon.
Neither the Lancet nor the authors of the study attributed any of the supposed 186,000 deaths to Israel. Not a one was Israel blamed for in the study. And you have reinforced that truth by not being able to provide a single quote from the Lancet or the study that says that. You keep pathetically repeating that lie and make yourself look like a fool.
500,000-800,00 were killed in 100 days in Rwanda. Is that Israeli propaganda?
6,000,000 Jews were killed in the Holocaust. That is documented history. Or do you claim it is Israeli propaganda?
40,000 have died in Gaza in 11 months, which includes about half being Hamas fighters.
And you have the unmitigated gall to compare Gaza to Rwanda and the Holocaust. The only thing you've proven is how your hate has warped your mind.
I was addressing Shack, who still claims that letting the kids get polio shots excuses the 40000 killed as well as the total destruction of infrastructure, hospitals and schools.What?
I support Palestinian rights, not the genocide.
Was this meant for Shazi?
Poor job of translating. But we all know it was intentional.I was addressing Shack, who still claims that letting the kids get polio shots excuses the 40000 killed as well as the total destruction of infrastructure, hospitals and schools.
All fair points except for the last part.Look, I don't think all righties hate gays, minorities or trans people. There are conservatives who are these people, some all three. But, looking at the US and the policies the GOP are promoting, there is a general dislike for them having rights or living their lives. I will agree that there are people on the left who hate righties. I personally HATE the white nationalists and supremacists. As a white man, I think they are scum suckers who are dangerously misguided, hatefilled and uninformed. Does that make me a bad person? I think not.
I think you might be confusing hatred of right-wing policies and hatred of the person. While that can overlap, I know a lot of conservatives (now, they are Ontario conservatives, not MAGA morons). I like them, work with them, play with them. I do not agree with all of their views or anything like that, but, then again, they are not extremists. I think the vast majority of people on here probably feel the same way about both sides. ON this board, it isn't personal. I don't know a thing about you, nor you of me. So, while the rhetoric we use on here is more in your face raw, it doesn't mean I love or hate anyone here.
The last thing I'll say is this: In the US, the right has being using the term Liberal as a slur for decades. They're also called Marxists, Commies or socialists by people who don't appear to know what those things actually are. Is there an equivalent for righties? Not really. Sure, some are called fascist (and some actually want to be fascist), but I think it is interesting that it was the right who started the name calling, but get all hurt when it gets thrown back at them.
Tell that to the UN, ICC and ICJ.Poor job of translating. But we all know it was intentional.
It shows how bogus the claims of genocide are.
It definitely is in American politics.Liberals is not a derogatory name.
I should tell those people that wigglee intentionally misinterpreted what I said?Tell that to the UN, ICC and ICJ.
You agree with the UN, Shazi?I should tell those people that wigglee intentionally misinterpreted what I said?
And about the genocide claim being bogus, at this point the UNGA and UNSC are agreeing with me. Keep shooting blanks.
I agree with them not passing any resolutions condemning Israel of genocide.You agree with the UN, Shazi?
I think the UN will pass more resolutions against Israel, just as the ICC an ICJ will continue to charge Israel.I agree with them not passing any resolutions condemning Israel of genocide.
The question is do you agree with that? Are they correct in not doing so? Yes or no, Geno. Remember it was you who said that we must always agree with them.
I'm making a bold prediction. You will not give a direct answer.
As is your right Genostradamus the Wrong. But your batting average puts you at the bottom of the league.I think the UN will pass more resolutions against Israel, just as the ICC an ICJ will continue to charge Israel.
Oh look, you used a video with death threats to make a point.As is your right Genostradamus the Wrong. But your batting average puts you at the bottom of the league.
Do you think that the US will allow the UN to pass resolutions against Israel like they did against S. Africa with res. no. 1761 on apartheid? Especially with those evil lobbyists and dirty money from those Jews that you're always whining about. LOL.
Well, do you, punk.
I asked you a question.............punk. But as usual you are too afraid to give a direct answer.Oh look, you used a video with death threats to make a point.
Yes, Shazi, it will eventually happen.I asked you a question.............punk. But as usual you are too afraid to give a direct answer.
Do you think that the US will allow the UN to pass resolutions against Israel like they did against S. Africa with res. no. 1761 on apartheid? Especially with those evil lobbyists and dirty money from those Jews that you're always whining about. LOL.
"Well, do ya'?"