Are they subject to a collective bargaining agreement? Yes.
They're unionized.
Maybe the word "collective" will tip you off to the reality that they are indeed unionized.
Do you prefer "syndicate"? "Coalition"? etc etc. Semantics.
Meanwhile in Toronto...
- Thread starter Skoob
- Start date
They're unionized.
Maybe the word "collective" will tip you off to the reality that they are indeed unionized.
Do you prefer "syndicate"? "Coalition"? etc etc. Semantics.
It does at least provide some entertainment value. Looking forward to 3 more years of costumes and...................nothing.
Still won't provide an answer to a reasonable question? I must have struck a nerve...
Care to try again?
Will Chow make a difference or keep the status quo? Or will things get worse under her watch? If worse, why?
It’s illegal for the Toronto police to belong to a union. Therefore they can’t be unionized. That’s not semantics, that’s the law.
All the creepy tap dancing won’t change that.
Educate yourself. Or you can remain in your imaginary reality.
Are you asking about gun deaths or something else, skoob?
She's already made a difference.
No... they are a public display of diversity and inclusion, both of which you loathe.
You seem to be stuck on the word "unionized" and overlooking that the association is indeed fulfilling the mandate of a typical union.
So rather than spinning in semantics, how about looking at the essence of the issue here: Their union, association, collective, etc will protect them and not have them fired for misconduct.
Ignorant post, skoob.
Learn the legal difference between an association and a union and come back then.
You mean the same diversity and inclusion she displayed for Toronto Jews when she refused to participate in their flag ceremony?
That kind of diversity & inclusion?
I maintain they are the same in terms of collective bargaining and protecting their members from being fired.
Care to show me the difference...or will you just pretend there is one for trolling sake?
From the article you posted
Johnson said the number of shooting related deaths is consistent with data from previous years, but there’s a notable increase from 2023 because last year was an “outlier” that experienced a ten-year low in the number of shootings.
Did you post about how great it was that there were fewer shootings in 2023?
Nope
You're just here posting about how horrific it is that 2024 is about an average year for gun deaths in Toronto, a number which is still very low for a city of this size.
No, its more fun to watch you repeat idiotic claims over and over again.
Then when you finally learn the facts you'll claim you knew all along and declare you won another debate.
So go to it, keep up the ignorant posts.
You mean celebrating a state undertaking a genocide? Give your head a shake. Most of us haven’t been brainwashed on moral depravity.
Educate yourself. It will be difficult for you. Research is not one of your strengths.
I didn't post about 2023 because that outlier was explained in the article.
Will Chow make things better or not? If not, why?
Can't spend 5 minutes googling to see if you're a total idiot or not?
She made things better already.
Toronto has very low gun crimes for a city of this size.
You wanna make things better?
Get DoFo to stop destroying health care, education and public services that people need.
Chow is doing fine.
Ah so you're Frankfooter in disguise I see going down the geno-route I see.
Explains a lot about "your" posts.
