Get ready Kamala fans...this is just the beginning

[mandrill]

https://x.com/jeffmason1/status/1821319190047027671

Crowd waiting for
@KamalaHarris
in Michigan. (We could hear the noise from inside the plane.)

 

[mandrill]

Humphrey entered the race in April 1968. If you feel party insiders determining the nominee is the norm, that's fine. However, it's very well documented that the 1968 nomination process was reformed to give "Democratic" voters more direct determination of the nominee. Of course, it's not a popular vote process. We do know Kamala received zero votes in a Democratic primary.

In my opinion, LBJ's decision to not run in March 1968 was a more honest and realistic reaction to the situation than what transpired this spring and early summer.

So no, not the same.
Yeah, so. Comparing today's process to the process fifty-six years ago is more than extraneous.

Earp, isn't this the same obsession with irrelevant, self-serving minutiae as your 10-page argument that Trump wasn't judicially determined to be a sexual predator because he wasn't found guilty in a civil trial to the criminal standard?

No one really gives a fuck about whether KH would have been nominated back in 1968, do they? Except apparently for you.

 

[WyattEarp]

Earp, isn't this the same obsession with irrelevant, self-serving minutiae as your 10-page argument that Trump wasn't judicially determined to be a sexual predator because he wasn't found guilty in a civil trial to the criminal standard?

No one really gives a fuck about whether KH would have been nominated back in 1968, do they? Except apparently for you.

Are you even following the discussion?

Please stop this prepubescent obsession of following me around the schoolyard to repeatedly tell me you don't like me.

 

[mandrill]

Are you even following the discussion?

Please stop this prepubescent obsession of following me around the schoolyard to repeatedly tell me you don't like me.

Last time I checked, this was a discussion board and people discuss issues.

You're welcome to put me on ignore, if you choose.

My point is that no one - aside from a handful of GOP-supporting political buffs - really cares that the way Harris got nommed was irregular. Shit happens and it happened in the Dem party this year. Once in a lifetime, maybe. But that's how shit rolls.

So maybe it's more useful to focus on the issues of the campaign than to continually suggest that Biden was coup d'etat-ed and Harris is somehow an improper choice for the nom.

I've got a question for you btw. Given Trump's very sparse campaign schedule and the wet splat that JDV has made, will Trump stay the course, or will he either pull out altogether or will he fight a half-hearted campaign and claim it was unwinnable when he loses in October?

 

[Bucktee]

This is patronizing, condescending, and offensive.

She's a run-of-the-mill grifter.

 

[y2kmark]

Is it too late for the Republicans to replace Trump?

YES, if he stays alive. Big Macs have the only chance of keeping him off the ballot!!!

 

[y2kmark]

This is patronizing, condescending, and offensive.

She's a run-of-the-mill grifter.

Offensive to you, also to a whole lot of bigots. Smelvis has the bigot vote sewn up, but still has the shit he wants to harp on. What would White Jesus do?

 

[Bucktee]

 

[dirtydaveiii]

Is it too late for the Republicans to replace Trump?

Is it too late for his mom to have an abortion ?

 

[dirtydaveiii]

Humphrey entered the race in April 1968. If you feel party insiders determining the nominee is the norm, that's fine. However, it's very well documented that the 1968 nomination process was reformed to give "Democratic" voters more direct determination of the nominee. Of course, it's not a popular vote process. We do know Kamala received zero votes in a Democratic primary.

In my opinion, LBJ's decision to not run in March 1968 was a more honest and realistic reaction to the situation than what transpired this spring and early summer.

So no, not the same.



Yeah, so. Comparing today's process to the process fifty-six years ago is more than extraneous.

Why are Republicans so terrified of Kamala ? It's like you think you had a shot against Joe but know donnies going to lose bigly to anyone else

 

[dirtydaveiii]

What a dumb video. This guy is legit from da hood jus hangin wif his homies like he always do

 

[dirtydaveiii]

Are you even following the discussion?

Please stop this prepubescent obsession of following me around the schoolyard to repeatedly tell me you don't like me.

You need to tell your mom on him

 

[WyattEarp]

Why are Republicans so terrified of Kamala ? It's like you think you had a shot against Joe but know donnies going to lose bigly to anyone else

Maybe he will lose. He has to reorient his campaign. 78 year olds aren't known for their flexibility.

 

[WyattEarp]

The fact the right keeps pushing Shapiro is enough to know she made a good choice.

Nah.
They would have picked one of the people she didn't choose and hype them no matter what.
It's an easy PR play.

Shapiro was the frontrunner for VP. Pennsylvania is a key state. It's fair to ask what made Walz the choice over him.

We all know that Democrats don't want to throw any more fuel to the fire that is the Palestinian-Israeli conflict going into the convention. Additionally, there seems to be some controversy following Shapiro over a multiple stabbed woman that was ruled a suicide. Something you don't want be explaining in this 90 day window.

By the same token, all of us can say "why didn't Trump just select Rubio or Scott?" They would be better selections against Harris-Walz.

You and I have been saying that while VP selections are great political entertainment they really are oversold as to their ability to win Presidential elections.

 

[dirtydaveiii]

Maybe he will lose. He has to reorient his campaign. 78 year olds aren't known for their flexibility.

Trump is perhaps the weakest candidate of all time. The GOP has been the weaker party for at least decades. They have no policy and no reasonable explanation as to how they are going to accomplish anything they say so their only chance is to bash their superior rivals. The democrats push agenda and what they are going to change while the GOP relies solely on fear mongering and personal attacks . Some may say that the left has personally attacked Trump but that isn't true, they are just reporting how flawed he is.

 

[WyattEarp]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1821624499693117441

NEW: Donald Trump comments on Kamala Harris' relationship with former SF mayor Willie Brown, the man she slept with who helped kickstart her career. Harris was 29 at the time she dated Brown who was 60. "Well, I know Willie Brown very well." "He told me terrible things about [Kamala]. He had a big part in what happened with Kamala... He was not a fan of hers very much at that point."

Mitch,
This is not a winning message for Trump. He will just piss off suburban, moderate woman. The woman who will take this gossip to heart are already voting Republican.

 

[squeezer]

Shapiro was the frontrunner for VP. Pennsylvania is a key state. It's fair to ask what made Walz the choice over him.

We all know that Democrats don't want to throw any more fuel to the fire that is the Palestinian-Israeli conflict going into the convention. Additionally, there seems to be some controversy following Shapiro over a multiple stabbed woman that was ruled a suicide. Something you don't want be explaining in this 90 day window.

By the same token, all of us can say "why didn't Trump just select Rubio or Scott?" They would be better selections against Harris-Walz.

You and I have been saying that while VP selections are great political entertainment they really are oversold as to their ability to win Presidential elections.

I do not disagree with most of what you said except Walz is a great attack dog and I believe he will compliment Harris and be an asset heading towards November instead of Vance being dead weight laying on a musty couch. I will also add Shapiro sees himself as number 1, not a number 2 whereas Walz is ecstatic to be her second in command. In years to come, I can see Shapiro at the top of the ticket.

 

[squeezer]

This wasn't Trump's only message. Trump spoke off the cuff for 77 minutes. No teleprompters, took a lot of questions from the press!!

and he sounds like a lying fool, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. I would love to see the looks on the faces of his campaign handlers. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

 

[WyattEarp]

Last time I checked, this was a discussion board and people discuss issues.

I'm not even sure I know what you are seeing. Valcazar and I were having a discussion. Val noted that similar to Kamala, Humphrey didn't win any primaries in 1968. Then somehow you're upset I'm discussing Humphrey.

You're always welcome to join our discussion. You are less welcome to be the arbiter of what is appropriate to post or not post.

You're welcome to put me on ignore, if you choose.

Many of our discussions are fine. I don't think we agree on a lot but it's not all disagreement.

Complaining certain discussions on an escort website political forum are esoteric seems to be redundant.

 

[WyattEarp]

I do not disagree with most of what you said except Walz is a great attack dog and I believe he will compliment Harris and be an asset heading towards November instead of Vance being dead weight laying on a musty couch. I will also add Shapiro sees himself as number 1, not a number 2.........

Don't take this wrong way, but I all I picked up on from your Walz post was he's a dog and number 2.