Trump loses 6% in the polls since his fake ear injury
- Thread starter dirtydaveiii
- Start date
That's because the biased judge wouldn't let him say anything.It’s not really a he said she said when she said but he said nothing
Not quite...you said Trump admitted he was a rapist...he didn't.
Imagine for a moment if the legal system was based on people just making shit up as their proof.
So you're not saying he's a rapist convicted of rape any longer.
Good.
Thanks
btw no one is really guilty of rate, except maybe the quotient of two quantities in different units of measurement, but even then only a biased judge would convict on that premise if he happened to be a friend of the prosecutor.
ahahahaha of course! I thought it was the deep state that has a final say on whether the defendant takes the stand or not
but it's the judge PS - It's “Donald Rapist Trump” from now to November. Let’s not let the public forget it!
Is the Nickname ‘Donald Rapist Trump’ Defamatory?
The former president was found liable for behavior that a judge said is commonly understood as “rape.” So why not call him what he apparently is?
Ahh good.
So the whole "It is about the legal definition of rape and people need to accept the judge's rulings" was just complete bullshit.
Glad you set that straight.
Your whole "No one has committed rape in Canada since 1982" approach to the law was kind of embarrassing for you, and I'm glad you've stopped pretending you cared about the definition of rape under NY State law.
From your TDS-infused article:ahahahaha of course! I thought it was the deep state that has a final say on whether the defendant takes the stand or not
PS - It's “Donald Rapist Trump” from now to November. Let’s not let the public forget it!
Is the Nickname ‘Donald Rapist Trump’ Defamatory?
The former president was found liable for behavior that a judge said is commonly understood as “rape.” So why not call him what he apparently is?www.thedailybeast.com
"To be a “rapist,” a person needs only to have committed rape; the person does not need to have been convicted of rape."
So he didn't commit rape and was never convicted of rape.
You'll have to try harder...
You must be confusing me with someone else. I have no idea what that Canada comment is about.
The judge never ruled for rape. So it's not about accepting a judge's ruling in this case as desperately as you try to turn it into that.
The jury never ruled for rape either. So you're doubly wrong.
But another judge did rule Trump a rapist when he tried to sue his victim for calling him a rapist
No.
That was the judge's opinion as to why he denied Trump's bid for a new trial. It wasn't a verdict of guilt. It wasn't a ruling of rape. It was an basis of opinion as to why he denied the request.
Hey BS,
I'm glad you've finally understood and are not calling him a rapist any longer.
Just because I called you out for lying about him being convicted of rape and you couldn't prove otherwise doesn't mean you have to tap dance and pivot to something else.
Just accept that you were wrong and show some integrity.
the conduct the jury effectively found Trump liable for — forced digital penetration — meets a more common definition of rape. He cited definitions offered by the American Psychological Association and the Justice Department, which in 2012 expanded its definition of rape to include penetration “with any body part or object.”
How many times did you argue that rape isn't rape when rump does it today?
Why is this so important to you?
Why do you want the states to be run by a rapist?
See, if it were me and there was a 50% chance the candidate was a rapist I just won't vote for them.
But you will, you will go out of your way to defend the rapist and try to slander anyone who says rapists shouldn't be presidents.
"effectively" doesn't mean "did". "a more common definition" doesn't mean "the definition".
If you want to educate yourself you can read the jury form before making false assumptions...pay close attention to items 1 and 3.
Seems to me it's more important to you. You jump onto every response I make to other members and can't resist doing so.
I don't call people who have not been convicted of rape "rapists". In your banana court fantasy world you would judge people based on opinion, zero evidence and hatred.
