That isn't what I am saying and there is no way that someone who can actually read would take that talking point from what I said.
Lets see if I can explain it to you, I got time to waste.
You tossed around the supporting a rapist claim
I point out that hamas via a source you respect [and not a source simply publishing a letter to an editor] a source that you cite that Hamas is guilty of rape [as well as murder and civilian taking]
That makes you are supporter of rapists which makes your accusation either very hypocritical or a case of horrid evil game recognizing horrid evil game.
Now if you were inventing some atrocity that the Israeli government was doing like that lie that they are trying to kill everyone they can get their hands on when both the body count and their efforts to avoid MDKing civilians shows this is not true AND I responded solely with a Hamas do the rape [which is true] then you can counter with pointing out that I didn't counter your initial claim and give tacit [is that the word] approval of your claim.
However in this case, you made so such claim in terms of what I responded to, so this does not imply.
See how that works?
I think it's funny/sad that when I slam into you for defending Hamas not by proving they did not commit horrible acts but by making claims against Israel [which are often proved to be wrong] which means one can infer that you admit that Hamas are horrible cunts, that you don't fully understand the rhetorical device that I am using, in so far that you used it incorrectly.
Also Israel does shit, but it is either, nowhere near the scale of Hamas, not official policy, an unavoidable effect of attacking an enemy that has dug itself into built up areas and specifically hides in civilian rich targets because they know who will get the blame leaving Israel with the unacceptable choice of attacking an unfortunate spot or just letting terrorists run buck wild... you know Hamas effectively holding their own people as hostage human shields, or I think this is 4th doing a reasonable action to keep a country with a very weak geographical defense safe when surrounded by people who either have stated goals to exterminate them or wouldn't mind seeing them wiped off the face of the earth but gave up after having their asses handed to them decade after decade.
So to answer you question, what Israel does is nothing at all like what Hamas does
The biggest point of this, the IDF often provides warnings to civilians when they attack which is horrible military strategy that gets your own people killed to minimize Gaza dead, Hamas tells their people to stay put to maximize their bodycount because as the terb hate squad Indian professor of logic pointed out, they need a lot more bodies to manipulate the west into defending [my words their evil]
I shared a news report not from twitter or some right wing Israel source but IIRC Reuters.
Israel is trying to minimize dead at the expense of their own soldier's lives, Hamas is trying to prevent this to get their own people killed. People like you want Gaza to be piled high with corpses because like Hamas you know you need to separate the west from Israel at the very least to have a chance and you are willing to do that over the bodies of the people in Gaza. This is also why Hamas did their murder rape hostage taking spree specifically targeting civilians [as opposed to the IDF who kills civilians as collateral damage, even the US army kills allied troops in war as Jimmy Carr uses for comedic effect, it's unavoidable]. Hamas started shit knowing Israel MUST respond and knowing full well what would happen to them. If anyone is a menace to Gaza it's Hamas. And that is what makes your repeated claims of genocide this and genocide that so gauling. A bit like a Neo Nazi wondering why that bad man Churchill picked on that nice man Hitler and people bitching about the WWII bombing campaigns, A bombs? Rape of Nanking, UNit 731, Three All campaigns, POW treatment, Comfort women, that's why.
Fuck around, find out. Even worse, they knew they would find out, they wanted to find out and the more they find out the better they think it is for them.
See this is how you counter a claim, by ripping it apart not by going, nu uh your people did XYZ.
