That's a lot of fear mongering for nothing.You mean, "not yet"
Justin Trudeau and his lackey Christia Freeland are aiming to tax the appreciation in your savings, including your principal residence.
You don't have to like the capital tax hike (that's fine), but it shouldn't lead to bad assertions either.
All they have done is increase the tax rate from 50% to 67% on annual income over $250,000. What they didn't do is
- Change anything for annual income below $250,000 on capital gains
- Kept the cap gain rate below 75% which it was once at.
- Didn't change the rate on short term capital gains (1 year or less) which is still very favourable compared to interest, dividends, or other short term income like employment. If anything that could be a real target.
Also they actually increased the small business exemption on cap gains from $1.02M to $1.25 Million.
It's quite a jump to then claim they are coming after our primary houses based on the somewhat limited changes they have done.
As for the taxing the "appreciation in your savings" as if its some new tax concept of Liberals.... when your RRSP increases in value via interest, cap gains, or dividends, that appreciation on that investment is taxed on withdrawal Has been taxed by every government the same way. When you earn interest on savings, or dividends on savings, it gets taxed, like it always has.
This current narrative by those against the cap gain increase, "They are coming after income that was already taxed" is a silly narrative as other investment / saving type incomes get taxed at even higher rates than capital gains, I'm fine with it not being at 100%, because inflation is part of the appreciation, but saying it should be 0% isn't really fair compared to other investments or saving income either.
Last edited: