Yes.Which proves that the system worked for them.
Of course, to that crew, anything short of getting everything you want is proof something is rigged.
Yes.Which proves that the system worked for them.
Like I said, I don't think it is a strong argument.I don't think it does involve federal election law. The payments were obscured to give candidate Trump a better chance in an election which happened to be for a federal position. But that's not an interface with federal law. That's just Turnipface's motivation to falsify his records.
See!They also challenged Merchan's jury questionnaire as well!!
I think what happens if SCOTUS decides he has immunity will depend a lot on what things they decide he has immunity for.I’ve wondered about this too…along with the fact that they are seriously considering Trump’s appeal regarding presidential immunity. SCOTUS could very well throw all of these cases out…but as I understand it that does not mean Trump is Not Guilty…it would mean the prosecutors would need to decide whether or not re-try the case?
DOJ has a memo guiding internal procedure that says a sitting President can't be tried.And if it is re-tried, can that even be done with a sitting POTUS (if Trump were re-elected)?
As I understand it, that would apply to the federal charges. The porn star/hush money case involves state charges…as does Fani Willis’ Jan 6 case in Georgia (which I believe is on hold awaiting the outcome of the presidential immunity case).…So there is no chance DOJ pursues the cases in your scenario.
But of course, the hush money crime was committed by the felon in question BEFORE he was elected president. And he was charged and tried after he had been turfed from office.I think what happens if SCOTUS decides he has immunity will depend a lot on what things they decide he has immunity for.
DOJ has a memo guiding internal procedure that says a sitting President can't be tried.
That's not legally binding, it is just policy.
But if Trump is President, he has already said he intends to weaponize the DOJ and staff it with loyalists who will go after who he wants gone after.
So there is no chance DOJ pursues the cases in your scenario.
SCOTUS could rule that the immunity applies to state charges.As I understand it, that would apply to the federal charges. The porn star/hush money case involves state charges…as does Fani Willis’ Jan 6 case in Georgia (which I believe is on hold awaiting the outcome of the presidential immunity case).
Ironically, it may be “States’ Rights” that protect the integrity of the Union?
Like I said, it would depend on what the actual decision is.But of course, the hush money crime was committed by the felon in question BEFORE he was elected president. And he was charged and tried after he had been turfed from office.
So how does immunity apply?
Does every person who announces he will run for president acquire immunity magically. How about fringe candidates like Cornel West or RFK Jr or even more obscure posers??!!
Indeed. They can’t wait for the chance to get their hands on the “Biden Crime Family.” smh…
Some of SCOTUS is likely to try to find a way to word things so that Trump has immunity but it won't apply to other presidents (especially Democratic ones).
Sure. Isn't it amazing how what Congress did was legal? Who made the laws up? Who voted to fund the office?But this case wasn't about voluntary sex with a porn star.
The judge did not ignore them. He rejected them.Trump's defence filed all these motions, before trial, and Merchan ignored all of them!! Trump's defence tried to get Merchan to recuse himself from the case, and he wouldn't recuse himself!!
Why? Trump is above the law while everybody else is below?This case shouldn't have been brought in the first place!!
I think they like the Republican conservative agenda and Christian fundamentalism. I don't think they give a shit about Trump.Like I said, it would depend on what the actual decision is.
Some of SCOTUS is likely to try to find a way to word things so that Trump has immunity but it won't apply to other presidents (especially Democratic ones).
Listen has Biden been convicted in any Court of Law of "Genocide" like you claim? These are just protesters who are protesting against The USA's support of Israel who are conducting the killing of the Palestinian women and children. At least Biden has called for a ceasefire, unlike the Republicans who want Israel to pursue it till the very end even if it involves the annihilation of all those in Gaza if that is the only way to "Eliminate" Gaza!!Is the part where I provide you proof and then you'll just change the subject? And then refuse to apologize for accusing me of lying?
Ok...let's see if you live up to my expectations...
President Joe Biden has been dogged for months by pro-Palestinian protesters calling him “Genocide Joe”
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/...s-columbia-university-funding-donors-00156135
“To issue a red line that you knew you weren’t going to follow through on not only means he will continue to be Genocide Joe, but it also just shows he’s weak politically.”
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024...-rafah-advocates-ask-where-is-bidens-red-line
Biden tries to shake off 'Genocide Joe' epithet, but it could be the issue that sinks him
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opin...genocide-democrats-2024-election/72480021007/
Things you would spend money on regardless of whether or not there is a campaign aren't campaign expenses.Sure. Isn't it amazing how what Congress did was legal? Who made the laws up? Who voted to fund the office?
Do you think sexual harassment suits by Congressional interns would have an effect on reelection? And paying them off should be a campaign expense?
Wow......Things you would spend money on regardless of whether or not there is a campaign aren't campaign expenses.
Depends on who.I think they like the Republican conservative agenda and Christian fundamentalism. I don't think they give a shit about Trump.





