Not at all. I am basing my question on how polarized most people's opinion of Trump is.Have you followed it closely enough to form an opinion? I know I haven’t
You just need one fan on the jury panel to vote in favour of Trump. Very likely that the case will be dismissed on that basis, unless the rest of the jury happens to convince this individual about Trump's obvious guilt. No wonder that Trump is not testifying, although he promised to do so. He commits a lot of howlers that may reveal more rather than move the needle in his favour!!Not at all. I am basing my question on how polarized most people's opinion of Trump is.
Regardless of the jury selection process, I have serious doubts that they weeded out all the hard-core Trump fans and Trump-haters from the jury.
You are obviously thinking about this.......which is great. You don't need me to validate your read on things.Forget about the legal side of it for a moment. Let’s just talk facts.
Is there any other version than:
Trump decided to pay money to Daniels right before the elections to make sure that she doesn’t go public and Trump needed it to be done in a way that would not be connected to his reportable campaign payments because these records are accessible by the public. So Trump had cohen pay for it and then trump reimbursed cohen adding cohens income tax obligations on top and then both documented it as payment for services even though there was nowhere near that amount of services ever provided.
Is there any other version?
Do people still listen to 'I kept my underwear on' Dersh?
The "non-expert" host as you call him is or was a lawyer so I think he has a tad little more expertise than most folks. Plus, he's an American so you can't use that against him either.Squeeze,
This is embarrassing commentary. The non-expert host's interrupting to make analogies to a crack prosecution and beating your wife are simply silly.
This is infotainment. It is sure to excite and entertain Democrats.
Skooby, good comeback. It would cost Trumpy a heck of a lot more than 130K to stroke and fondle Squeezie Jr. but a good comeback.This one works and it's funny!
I mean the way he's stroking you is hilarious!
Wheww! That's good to know.The "non-expert" host as you call him is or was a lawyer so I think he has a tad little more expertise than most folks. Plus, he's an American so you can't use that against him either.
Possibility? You think he actually posted it himself? And then took it down himself? Because someone forced him?I'm not agreeing to anything. I will say there is a possibility that someone posted that. But, it is equally as likely he posted it and then was forced to take it down. And, I think you're proving my point. His defenders are constantly saying you're taking things out of context...The man is a walking contradiction of shit. You can't believe anything he says, or what he says he doesn't mean, or if he meant it, he meant it only in a specific way....Y'all wanna go on about Biden's speaking issues. He stutters and occasionally says something incorrect. But you never hold Trump to the same scrutiny, especially when it appears he is becoming increasingly senile....