Sometimes I like to think Mitchell thinks this guy is real.Mitchell's "gospel truth"!!
Sometimes I like to think Mitchell thinks this guy is real.Mitchell's "gospel truth"!!
Mitchell's "gospel truth"!!
Any comments from mitchell to dispute this document? Ohh well his source will be the usual one from mama's basement!!the nail in the coffin
millions of Americans worshipping a conman with an orange face is a great shame that will not be easily forgottenTrump Ruthlessly TAUNTED as "Radioactive Orange" by ABC Host
A convicted fraudster, a hooker and a president walk into a bar
I mean, sure, the jury could find Cohen unreliable. Or, they could see the evidence that has been presented, that Cohen's testimony validates. And, I'm not sure @Travis_for_Trump is a legal scholar....Sor, him thinking the case is over is probably just more cult member wishful thinking...
JUST IN: Todd Blanche is absolutely destroying every ounce of credibility Michael Cohen has left on the stand. He’s playing podcast clips exposing Cohen for exactly what he is. “He’s about to get a taste of what I went through. Revenge is a dish best served cold.” “Picturing Donald Trump being walked through the booking process fills me with delight.” “ I truly F**king hope this man ends up in prison.” Cohen has tried to sound nice and calm on the stand, but in the podcast he sounds absolutely excited for Trump to be indicted and even took credit. This case is done. Cohen absolutely blew it with his big mouth. Why did the DA’s office think they could trust such a degenerate?
I still don't understand the defence's theory though. What are they trying to sell the jury? That Cohen took a loan and paid hush money on his own accord and not expected to be paid back? That he actually has been providing genuine legal services @$35k/month for months and months while there is zero proof of those services and trump would have had it? None of that shit holds any waterI mean, sure, the jury could find Cohen unreliable. Or, they could see the evidence that has been presented, that Cohen's testimony validates. And, I'm not sure @Travis_for_Trump is a legal scholar....Sor, him thinking the case is over is probably just more cult member wishful thinking...
And, they are still trying to pretend that Trump didn't have sex with Stormy. But, if it wasn't true, why the hell would he pay $130K? It just doesn't make sense, and I'm sure it is something the jury will ponder.I still don't understand the defence's theory though. What are they trying to sell the jury? That Cohen took a loan and paid hush money on his own accord and not expected to be paid back? That he actually has been providing genuine legal services @$35k/month for months and months while there is zero proof of those services and trump would have had it? None of that shit holds any water
there's no way he testifies. How will he explain what he paid Cohen for?And, they are still trying to pretend that Trump didn't have sex with Stormy. But, if it wasn't true, why the hell would he pay $130K? It just doesn't make sense, and I'm sure it is something the jury will ponder.
So....the next question: Will Trump testify? He claimed he would, but he's chickenshit and lies like a rug. Plus, he would get destroyed on cross by the prosecution...Too much jeopardy for him to speak under oath...But, man, would I LOVE to see that train wreck...
What is the prosecution trying to sell the jury?? They haven't come up with a crime, yet??I still don't understand the defence's theory though. What are they trying to sell the jury? That Cohen took a loan and paid hush money on his own accord and not expected to be paid back? That he actually has been providing genuine legal services @$35k/month for months and months while there is zero proof of those services and trump would have had it? None of that shit holds any water
What is the prosecution trying to sell the jury?? They haven't come up with a crime, yet??