I agree, if your plan is to make life unaffordable in Canada
but it's going to accomplish absolute zilch to stop climate change
the biggest polluters are increasing their emissions
China, US and India do not have carbon tax
and they do not give a crap about the climate
this carbon tax in Canada is the biggest virtue signaling yet
and it will cost us dearly
the Canadian Clean Fuel Standards is another hidden taxHere's a list of countries that have been fooled into thinking paying carbon taxes will "fix" the climate.
You'll notice that the countries who actually account for most of the CO2 emissions globally don't pay carbon taxes and that's why they're not on this list.
Namely, China, US, India, Russia, Japan and Germany.
Canada accounts for about 1%. And we're in the top 10 of highest carbon taxes per ton globally.
Had enough yet?
View attachment 312053
https://www.statista.com/statistics...cing-instruments-worldwide-by-select-country/
HOW MUCH ARE THESE POLICIES GOING TO COST CONSUMERS?
At current levels the carbon price adds about 14 cents to a litre of gas. That will rise 3.3 cents per year until 2030, when it will add 37 cents.
HST and GST are charged on top of that, which varies by province. The additional sales tax due to carbon pricing in 2023 ranges from 0.7 cents in the Prairies to 2.15 cents in the Atlantic. In 2030 will range from 1.85 cents in the Prairies to 5.56 cents in Atlantic Canada.
The cost of the clean fuel regulations is more murky because it's not a direct fee. It will depend on what the refineries and importers do to meet the regulations and how much of the costs they pass on to consumers.
It is expected the costs will be low at first, because most companies will not have to do much to comply in the early years.
By 2030 the cost is expected to vary from six to 13 cents per litre for gasoline and seven to 16 cents for diesel, depending on how the companies decide to comply.
But the energy boards for two Atlantic provinces have already decided to start passing on the costs to consumers now, at varying levels.
note: When Trudeau was elected in 2015 Canadian retail prices averaged $1.09 per litre.In 2030, the carbon price and clean fuel regulations together could add anywhere from about 45.15 cents to about 56.2 cents per litre.
3 cents a litre.the Canadian Clean Fuel Standards is another hidden tax
Climate policies and fossil fuel: Clean fuel regulations and carbon pricing explained
On Saturday, the federal government's long-promised clean fuel regulations will take effect across Canada. Here are five things to know about what they are, how they will affect you and why they are different from the carbon price.www.ctvnews.ca
note: When Trudeau was elected in 2015 Canadian retail prices averaged $1.09 per litre.
the video states the taxes will cost the Canadian economy $9 billon
Had enough yet?
3 cents a litre.
Meanwhile gas goes up and down 20 cents in a week and nobody complains about the oil&gas industry.
he is a lefty, all they do is lieare you still here ?
you have absolutely no shame after been absolutely proven wrong about the extreme weather propaganda
and now you are back trying to down play the true cost of the carbon tax and slide in some more propaganda about wildfires
despite have previously been the facts showning acreage burnt is down significantly
View attachment 312182
So now we have you pegged in more detail
you just rotate through your scary propaganda pieces, get called out for them by facts ,
you pay the truth zero heed and move onto your next lie , despite knowing them to be false
get some help
You have never proven one single fact other than your ignorance about science.are you still here ?
you have absolutely no shame after been absolutely proven wrong about the extreme weather propaganda
and now you are back trying to down play the true cost of the carbon tax and slide in some more propaganda about wildfires[
We've been over this before multiple times. The data before 1983 was not reported the same way in the US.despite have previously been the facts showing acreage burnt is down significantly
unless of course you re claiming climate change is different in the us vs Brazil
View attachment 312182
So now we have you pegged in more detail
you just rotate through your scary propaganda pieces, get called out for them by facts ,
you pay the truth zero heed and move onto your next lie , despite knowing them to be false
get some help
i have proved you wrong so many times I have lost countYou have never proven one single fact other than your ignorance about science.
We've been over this before multiple times. The data before 1983 was not reported the same way in the US.
US federal wildfire page:
Prior to 1983, the federal wildland fire agencies did not track official wildfire data using current reporting processes. As a result, there is no official data prior to 1983 posted on this site."
https://www.nifc.gov/fire-information/statistics/wildfires
usa wild fires have decreasedYour denialism is pathetic. You cherry picked one country's forest fire data, ignoring global data because of this one error.
wrong againMeanwhile you ignore all these measurements:[
satellite temps shown nothing that can not be explained by natural variability of a coupled non-linear chaotic systemGlobal temp
sea levels have been rising slowly for 20,00 years , nothing new hereSea levels
Ha Ha , good luck getting accurate temp data going back more than 40 yearsSea temps
90% of the worlds ice and 70% of the world fresh water are in Antarctica which is frozen 99% of the timePolar melts
Glacial melts
WTF, now you do not even wait a day or two to repeat a lieExtreme weather events
the models are worthlessAll of those measurements show the IPCC projections are doing very, very well
the blithering's of a fooland you are arguing on behalf of the oil&gas industry to fuck up the planet for your own children, should you have any.
Most of the time, to themselves.he is a lefty, all they do is lie
that might depend on the redemption potential of the character who is lyingthat is the worst kind of lie
Baseless slander.i have proved you wrong so many times I have lost count
see posts 32 & 55 as recent, relevant examples
watching you try to fake your way through science discussions is like watching someone try to play ice hockey despite not ever having skated before
Your ignorance is that obvious
and so is your lying
https://www.nifc.gov/fire-information/statistics/wildfires
You realize that you just proved my point, that the national records were updated to start from 1983 because all previous data was not dependable.you can not just pretend the previous data does not exist
the climate alarmists tried pulling a fast one, they got caught and now you want to claim the data is no good ?
what is wrong with you?
No, they haven't.usa wild fires have decreased
yet you want everyone to believe the rest of the world fire burn acreage has increased since the 1920s ?
once again you should realize when your lying appears ridiculous and comical
No, the satellite data shows the exact same warming as surface data.satellite temps shown nothing that can not be explained by natural variability of a coupled non-linear chaotic system
try learning what non-linear means
try learning what chaotic means
Stupid denial.sea levels have been rising slowly for 20,00 years , nothing new here
the Maldives island asked for $$ claiming their island is sinking
then they built several new airports and land area increase have been reports
its all about the Benjamin's
This is stupid and incoherent rambling.Ha Ha , good luck getting accurate temp data going back more than 40 years
90% of the worlds ice and 70% of the world fresh water are in Antarctica which is frozen 99% of the time
You do understand the temperature must be above the frizzing point for melting to occur or do you not understand this ?
WTF, now you do not even wait a day or two to repeat a lie
see posts 32 & 55
IPCC has low confidence in extreme weather changes
You do understand what low confidence means or do you not understand this ?
Stupid comment when the evidence shows they have been very, very good.the models are worthless
You once said something to the effect that if you are wrong you are participating in the greatest crime against humanity ever.the blithering's of a fool
how many people have you falsely accused of being on the oil&gas industry payroll?
anyone who you feel needs cancelling ?
I see
grow up
see posts 32 & 55Baseless slander.
You have proven nothing here, ever.
no that's not what i said , you blithering foolYou once said something to the effect that if you are wrong you are participating in the greatest crime against humanity ever.
watching you try to fake your way through science discussions is like watching someone try to play ice hockey despite not ever having skated before
Comparing the Climate Change to a "Ponzi scheme" is beyond ridiculousness!!When suggesting the carbon tax won't change the climate (or
something to the same effect) I am questioning the
consistency of our climate policy; I am not stating the reason why
I am opposed to it. I am opposed to carbon tax for the same reason
why majority of Canadians loathe it---the tax sucks.
Our climate leaders declared world is in the
middle of climate crisis, carbon emission has to be reduced
by half in less than a decade and to zero by 2050 to save younger
generation from suffering and dying. Personally I believe that is
fear mongering BS. But for me to accept the carbon tax as a
measure to fight climate change to be reasonable I would look
into the tax from a climate-advocate's perspective. My thinking
is that the tax won't save the climate because it won't likely induce
people to rethink their gas-gluttony in the context of climate change.
The tax does serve the purpose of convincing a fraction of climate
sheeple Trudeau is doing his job to combat climate change; you
know the people who benefits from the rebates and are naive
enough to believe impacts of droughts and forest fire on crops and
grocery prices are to be lessened by Trudeau and Guilbeault's ponzi
scheme. I see no reason why we should go along with the tax to help
with Trudeau's virtue-signalling.
Eventually, these exports will be phased out. however, are you aware of the quality of the BC Coal and its use as a raw material?You have any idea how many millions of tonnes of dirty coal
are exported from B.C. per year? And as recent as 2023 the
climate-change non-deniers there show apparently had no
intention to reduce let alone stop contributing to world's carbon
emission growth.
B.C.’s dirty little secret: it is ramping up thermal coal exports
As wildfires rage around the world, Canadian billionaire Jim Pattison is doubling down on the dirtiest fossil fuelricochet.media
Then why arriver 27 other nations in the world including the EU actually implementing it?nobody is denying climate and that it's changing,
but the biggest polluters are being let off the hook
our carbon tax will accomplish nothing but make Canada broke
you were sold a lie that somehow if you pay more taxes then Trudeau is going to stop climate change
so naive it boggles the mind
of course they doDo they want their nations to go "broke"?
Your personal opinion is worthless.see posts 32 & 55
no that's not what i said , you blithering fool
there is no climate emergency
The IPCC has low confidence that extreme weather events are increasing
and
you are completely untrustworthy and a laughing stock
watching you try to fake your way through science discussions is like watching someone try to play ice hockey despite not ever having skated before
Your ignorance is that obvious
and so is your lying
when is you next clown show?