Select Company Escorts

The clown show known as the Biden impeachment hearings

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,866
22,266
113
haha is that a "whataboutism"? Last I checked Trump hasn't been president for 4 years. Why would it matter what he supports or not?
Is that the way you don't care about what PeePee supports as long as he trolls the libs?
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,866
22,266
113
And....a Poilievre injection into a Biden thread right on schedule!
If you're going to try to play thread cop go charge yourself for talking about rump in the post I replied to, skoob.
Then get back to lying about what you say.
 

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
6,820
3,947
113
If you're going to try to play thread cop go charge yourself for talking about rump in the post I replied to, skoob.
Then get back to lying about what you say.
You troll by taking over threads and steering them into your narrative regardless of the topic.
You are obsessed and need help.
 

Skoob

Well-known member
Jun 1, 2022
6,820
3,947
113
off topic

Talk about Biden and the stupid GOP attempt to impeach him if you want to be on topic.
Explain why the guy Rudy hired says the claims are all bullshit, skooby.

Says the guy who starts talking about Poilievre in a Biden thread and now tells me to talk about Biden after I called him out for being off topic.
You are obsessed and need help.
 

dirtydaveiii

Well-known member
Mar 21, 2018
7,361
5,097
113
Says the guy who starts talking about Poilievre in a Biden thread and now tells me to talk about Biden after I called him out for being off topic.
You are obsessed and need help.
Get a room already you two
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
32,700
60,778
113
I did link to that thread, which was the pizzaburger named thread on the xitter and then included the one post of that thread that linked to the Klein.
Going to chalk that up to Elon breaking twitter then, since it won't show me threads anymore, just the actual post you linked to.

The latest bill defunding the UNRWA at the same time Blinken demanded more aid for Palestinians is a good example of the corporate side of the dems pushing bills. They included a clause that if funding resumes they can pull all funding for the UNRWA if the PA initiates or supports any ICC investigations. Meanwhile AOC calls for a ceasefire.
So you are arguing that the "evil corporate dems" snuck this in there, I suppose?
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,866
22,266
113
Last edited:

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,866
22,266
113
AIPAC wrote the entire US budget now?
Why would you make such a stupid comment?

Bernie calls it the starvation caucus.
Buried at the end of 1,012 pages of legislative text unveiled early Thursday is a section that says funds appropriated under the bipartisan bill "may not be used for a contribution, grant, or other payment" to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), which Gazans rely on for food and shelter. The U.S. is historically the largest donor to UNRWA.

From AIPAC's site.
Funding Bills Provide Critical Security Assistance for Israel
Press Release
AIPAC commends Congress for including key pro-Israel provisions in the funding bills for Fiscal Year 2024. Importantly, the legislation provides the full $3.3 billion in U.S. security assistance to Israel, as agreed to in the 2016 Memorandum of Understanding.
This essential funding, with no added political conditions, is urgently needed by our ally as Israel battles Hamas and other Iranian terrorist proxies on its borders.
The legislation includes these additional key provisions:

We appreciate the efforts of many members who worked to include key pro-Israel provisions in the bill. In particular, we thank the leadership of Senators Patty Murray (D-WA), Susan Collins (R-ME), Chris Coons (D-DE), Lindsay Graham (R-SC), Jon Tester (D-MT), Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), and Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and Representatives Kay Granger (R-TX), Rosa DeLauro (D-CT), Mario Diaz-Balart (R-FL), Barbara Lee (D-CA), Ken Calvert (R-CA), Betty McCollum (D-MN), Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL), Lois Frankel (D-FL), Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA), and Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY).
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
32,700
60,778
113
Why would you make such a stupid comment?
Because you said the bill was written by AIPAC and it's the funding for Fiscal Year 2024.
I didn't realize you had moved on from saying AIPAC had influence to saying the US Government spending is entirely controlled by AIPAC.

(I like your "this doesn't actually prove what I'm saying but I will post it in red" evidence though. )
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,866
22,266
113
Because you said the bill was written by AIPAC and it's the funding for Fiscal Year 2024.
I didn't realize you had moved on from saying AIPAC had influence to saying the US Government spending is entirely controlled by AIPAC.

(I like your "this doesn't actually prove what I'm saying but I will post it in red" evidence though. )
Fine, I corrected my post to say 'the section in the bill', for the picayune.
I am surprised that you haven't noticed that citated quotes on this board show up in red.
Were you expecting footnotes in Chicago style instead?

The key part of the budget quote was this:
AIPAC commends Congress for including key pro-Israel provisions in the funding bills for Fiscal Year 2024

Its about as close to an admission that they supplied the text as you'd get.
As usual, you are more concerned with form and grammar in the posts than you are with the idea that AIPAC managed to get a clause included in the bill saying that if Palestinians go to the ICC then the US will stop funding the UNRWA during an intentional famine in Gaza.

Perhaps this might get more of a reaction. Israel has destroyed every university in Gaza and is systematically killing all the profs.
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
32,700
60,778
113
Fine, I corrected my post to say 'the section in the bill', for the picayune.
Good. The "AIPAC secretly controls the US budget" was something I would think you would want to avoid.
As I said when the bill came out - it was contain a lot of fucking horrible shit because it was must pass or the government would shut down.

I am surprised that you haven't noticed that citated quotes on this board show up in red.
Were you expecting footnotes in Chicago style instead?
No.
I was expecting you to accidentally prove that your accusation that AIPAC controls the US budget was false, which you did.

As usual, you are more concerned with form and grammar in the posts than you are with the idea that AIPAC managed to get a clause included in the bill saying that if Palestinians go to the ICC then the US will stop funding the UNRWA during an intentional famine in Gaza.

Perhaps this might get more of a reaction. Israel has destroyed every university in Gaza and is systematically killing all the profs.
And that's your problem, Frank.
Like many of the chronically online, you are more concerned that people preformatively have the reaction you demand and then assume all kinds of things about people if they don't post the things you want in the way you want.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill
Toronto Escorts