Is that the way you don't care about what PeePee supports as long as he trolls the libs?haha is that a "whataboutism"? Last I checked Trump hasn't been president for 4 years. Why would it matter what he supports or not?
Is that the way you don't care about what PeePee supports as long as he trolls the libs?haha is that a "whataboutism"? Last I checked Trump hasn't been president for 4 years. Why would it matter what he supports or not?
And....a Poilievre injection into a Biden thread right on schedule!Is that the way you don't care about what PeePee supports as long as he trolls the libs?
If you're going to try to play thread cop go charge yourself for talking about rump in the post I replied to, skoob.And....a Poilievre injection into a Biden thread right on schedule!
You troll by taking over threads and steering them into your narrative regardless of the topic.If you're going to try to play thread cop go charge yourself for talking about rump in the post I replied to, skoob.
Then get back to lying about what you say.
off topicYou troll by taking over threads and steering them into your narrative regardless of the topic.
You are obsessed and need help.
Says the guy who starts talking about Poilievre in a Biden thread and now tells me to talk about Biden after I called him out for being off topic.off topic
Talk about Biden and the stupid GOP attempt to impeach him if you want to be on topic.
Explain why the guy Rudy hired says the claims are all bullshit, skooby.
Off topic.Says the guy who starts talking about Poilievre in a Biden thread and now tells me to talk about Biden after I called him out for being off topic.
You are obsessed and need help.
Does this mean they can reopen the Russia investigation, or at least read the friggin' Mueller Report???Off topic.
You do this every time you can't answer.
This is Rudy G's inside source.
They really should, I think there must be time to fit in one more rump trial before the election.Does this mean they can reopen the Russia investigation, or at least read the friggin' Mueller Report???
Get a room already you twoSays the guy who starts talking about Poilievre in a Biden thread and now tells me to talk about Biden after I called him out for being off topic.
You are obsessed and need help.
I can't afford the taxes on that room.Get a room already you two
Please don't make me spend any time alone with skoob.Get a room already you two
Going to chalk that up to Elon breaking twitter then, since it won't show me threads anymore, just the actual post you linked to.I did link to that thread, which was the pizzaburger named thread on the xitter and then included the one post of that thread that linked to the Klein.
So you are arguing that the "evil corporate dems" snuck this in there, I suppose?The latest bill defunding the UNRWA at the same time Blinken demanded more aid for Palestinians is a good example of the corporate side of the dems pushing bills. They included a clause that if funding resumes they can pull all funding for the UNRWA if the PA initiates or supports any ICC investigations. Meanwhile AOC calls for a ceasefire.
No, that's just AIPAC sponsoring and writing the section on AIPAC in the bill.So you are arguing that the "evil corporate dems" snuck this in there, I suppose?
AIPAC wrote the entire US budget now?No, that's just AIPAC sponsoring and writing the bill.
Though the progressives don't seem to be backing it.
Why would you make such a stupid comment?AIPAC wrote the entire US budget now?
Because you said the bill was written by AIPAC and it's the funding for Fiscal Year 2024.Why would you make such a stupid comment?
Fine, I corrected my post to say 'the section in the bill', for the picayune.Because you said the bill was written by AIPAC and it's the funding for Fiscal Year 2024.
I didn't realize you had moved on from saying AIPAC had influence to saying the US Government spending is entirely controlled by AIPAC.
(I like your "this doesn't actually prove what I'm saying but I will post it in red" evidence though. )
Good. The "AIPAC secretly controls the US budget" was something I would think you would want to avoid.Fine, I corrected my post to say 'the section in the bill', for the picayune.
No.I am surprised that you haven't noticed that citated quotes on this board show up in red.
Were you expecting footnotes in Chicago style instead?
And that's your problem, Frank.As usual, you are more concerned with form and grammar in the posts than you are with the idea that AIPAC managed to get a clause included in the bill saying that if Palestinians go to the ICC then the US will stop funding the UNRWA during an intentional famine in Gaza.
Perhaps this might get more of a reaction. Israel has destroyed every university in Gaza and is systematically killing all the profs.