La Villa Spa

Pro Hamas in the west - and their adventures

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,750
10,132
113
Toronto
No, its not the same difference.
The only ICJ rulings that can be taken to the UN if they are ignored are the Provisional Measures.
Hamas was already ordered. And Hamas is not a member of the UN.

The ICJ has ruled that Hamas committed war crimes. There is no such ruling against Israel.

Keep repeating your lies but it will never make them true. It is not reality.
1710688828634.png
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,750
10,132
113
Toronto
True, we all know that Israel is a pariah state...
...to a buch of shithole states.

They are a pariah but the UN repeatedly refuses to denounce them. And remember, frank, according to you we must always follow the UN's decisions. Yet here your, ignoring them.

Lie number 1948006.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,897
22,272
113
Hamas was already ordered. And Hamas is not a member of the UN.

The ICJ has ruled that Hamas committed war crimes. There is no such ruling against Israel.

Keep repeating your lies but it will never make them true. It is not reality.
View attachment 306091
None of that post is true, shack.
Palestinians are recognized by the UN, the ICJ only ordered Israel to do anything and the ICJ didn't rule that Hamas committed any war crimes.

 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,897
22,272
113
...to a buch of shithole states.

They are a pariah but the UN repeatedly refuses to denounce them. And remember, frank, according to you we must always follow the UN's decisions. Yet here your, ignoring them.

Lie number 1948006.
More of your Jewish racial supremacy, shack.
Calling the rest of the world 'shithole countries' only identifies you as a supremacist.

 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,750
10,132
113
Toronto
Post #1,002
Hamas was already ordered. And Hamas is not a member of the UN.

The ICJ has ruled that Hamas committed war crimes. There is no such ruling against Israel.

Keep repeating your lies but it will never make them true. It is not reality.
None of that post is true, shack.
Palestinians are recognized by the UN, the ICJ only ordered Israel to do anything and the ICJ didn't rule that Hamas committed any war crimes.
Keep lying. My post is 100% true. Every single word.

I said Hamas is not a member of the UN.
I said Hamas was ordered to return the hostages.
I said Hamas committed a war crime.
All of things are confirmed by the UN or an arm thereof.

Palestine has observer status (you can watch the real countries play but because you aren't a real country you can't join in). They are not a member. And as you say, we must always go by what the UN says. You look like such a fool. There are so many things that the UN says that you do not agree with but choose to ignore.

For the umpteenth time I've proven that you're a liar. Your refusal to admit it doesn't change anything. You are a frequent flier liar. The biggest liar on TERB. Everybody already knows it but it's nice that both of us can embarrass you together. You have earned your rep.

By the way, that's lie #1948007.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,897
22,272
113
Post #1,002



Keep lying. My post is 100% true. Every single word.

I said Hamas is not a member of the UN.
I said Hamas was ordered to return the hostages.
I said Hamas committed a war crime.
All of things are confirmed by the UN or an arm thereof.

Palestine has observer status (you can watch the real countries play but because you aren't a real country you can't join in). They are not a member. And as you say, we must always go by what the UN says. You look like such a fool. There are so many things that the UN says that you do not agree with but choose to ignore.

For the umpteenth time I've proven that you're a liar. Your refusal to admit it doesn't change anything. You are a frequent flier liar. The biggest liar on TERB. Everybody already knows it but it's nice that both of us can embarrass you together. You have earned your rep.

By the way, that's lie #1948007.
4 accusations in one post!

shack counter:
22 accusations of lying, 33 intentional misquotes (straw man arguments) - 0 proof


Provisional measure of protection

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A provisional measure of protection is the term that the International Court of Justice (ICJ, World Court) uses to describe a procedure "roughly equivalent"[1] to an interim order (which can be either a temporary restraining order or a temporary directive order) in national legal systems. The order has also been termed in the press as preliminary measures.[2] The carrying out of the procedure is termed indicating the provisional measure of protection.[1] Requests for the indication of provisional measures of protection take priority over all other cases before the ICJ due to their urgency.[1]

History
As of July 2018, the ICJ had dealt with 36 requests for the indication of provisional measures of protection (the number does not include multiple simultaneous versions of nearly-identical cases; it counts the "Legality of the Use of Force" cases once rather than ten times, but it includes multiple requests arising at different times in the same case by counting the 2004 Avena case twice).[3] In 1989, that number was twelve.[1]
Some of the parties involved include Iran, Pakistan, the United States, Nicaragua,[4] Burkina Faso, and Mali.[1]
On August 13, 2008, during the 2008 South Ossetia War, Georgia submitted a request for the indication of provisional measures of protection. The request was approved by a vote of 8 to 7.[5]
In January 2020, The Gambia successfully obtained an ICJ order for preliminary measures against Myanmar "to take urgent measures to protect its Muslim Rohingya population from persecution and atrocities, and preserve evidence of alleged crimes against them" under an enforcement of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The injunction had been registered with the Court some 60 days earlier. The 17-member court issued a unanimous decision. The final ruling might take years to be issued although the preliminary measures order called for the government of Myanmar to report its compliance within four months.[2]
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,750
10,132
113
Toronto
Hamas was already ordered. And Hamas is not a member of the UN.

The ICJ has ruled that Hamas committed war crimes. There is no such ruling against Israel.

Keep repeating your lies but it will never make them true. It is not reality.
4 accusations in one post!

shack counter:
22 accusations of lying, 33 intentional misquotes (straw man arguments) - 0 proof


Provisional measure of protection

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A provisional measure of protection is the term that the International Court of Justice (ICJ, World Court) uses to describe a procedure "roughly equivalent"[1] to an interim order (which can be either a temporary restraining order or a temporary directive order) in national legal systems. The order has also been termed in the
And Hamas was given an order, plain and simple. Not interim, or "roughly equivalent to" or temporary or restraining. They were given an order to return the hostages immediately. No qualifications or adjectives. Taking civilian hostages is a war crime.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,897
22,272
113
And Hamas was given an order, plain and simple. Not interim, or "roughly equivalent to" or temporary or restraining. They were given an order to return the hostages immediately. No qualifications or adjectives. Taking civilian hostages is a war crime.
No, shack.
Orders from the ICJ come through Provisional Measures.
All provisional measures were directed at Israel, not Hamas.

Stop lying.

Order of 26 January 2024



VI. CONCLUSION AND MEASURES TO BE ADOPTED

75. The Court concludes on the basis of the above considerations that the conditions required by its Statute for it to indicate provisional measures are met. It is therefore necessary, pending its final decision, for the Court to indicate certain measures in order to protect the rights claimed by South Africa that the Court has found to be plausible (see paragraph 54 above).

76. The Court recalls that it has the power, under its Statute, when a request for provisional measures has been made, to indicate measures that are, in whole or in part, other than those requested. Article 75, paragraph 2, of the Rules of Court specifically refers to this power of the Court. The Court has already exercised this power on several occasions in the past (see, for example, Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (The Gambia v.Myanmar), Provisional Measures, Order of 23 January 2020, I.C.J. Reports 2020, p. 28, para. 77).


https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/192/192-20240126-ord-01-00-en.pdf
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,641
6,771
113
Hamas should release their hostages as Israel should release all Palestinian prisoners and hostages during a ceasefire.
...
You're such a Hamas parrot.

Do you really think it appropriate to trade people taken hostage for being Jewish for people who have been convicted of serious crimes in a real court system?

Or you could just start calling for Hamas to release their hostages now as demanded by everyone and allowing aid to actually help people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,641
6,771
113
No, shack.
Orders from the ICJ come through Provisional Measures.
All provisional measures were directed at Israel, not Hamas.
...
SA brought the case against Israel so the ICJ can not make a ruling against Hamas on this case.

They said as clearly and decisively as possible that Hamas' use of hostages is illegal, as has the ICC and UN.
 

Vinson

Well-known member
Nov 24, 2023
1,705
1,429
113
Another pig trying to get in.

Illegal migrant from Lebanon caught at border admitted he’s a Hezbollah terrorist hoping ‘to make a bomb’ — and was headed for NY


A Lebanese migrant who was caught sneaking over the border admitted he’s a member of Hezbollah, he hoped to make a bomb, and his destination was New York, The Post can reveal.

Basel Bassel Ebbadi, 22, was caught by border patrol on March 9 near El Paso, Texas. While in custody he asked what he was doing in the US, to which he replied: “I’m going to try to make a bomb,” according to a Border Patrol document exclusively obtained by The Post.

But Ebbadi later claimed in an interview that he had been trying to flee Lebanon and Hamas because he “didn’t want to kill people” and said “once you’re in in, you can never get out,” according to internal ICE documents.

Ebbadi said in a sworn interview after his arrest that he had trained with Hezbollah for seven years and served as an active member guarding weapons locations for another four years, the documents show.



Ebbadi’s training focused on “jihad” and killing people “that was not Muslim,” he said.

Border agents continue to see a surge in migrants whose names appear on the terror watchlist entering the US illegally as crossings continue at record levels.

Hezbollah, an Iran-backed terror group, has launched missiles into northern Israel following Hamas’ attack on Oct. 7 that have killed about a dozen IDF soldiers and seven civilians.

bbadi didn’t have documents when he entered the US, claiming they were robbed “with a knife” while he was in Costa Rica, according to the ICE documents. He also admitted to using a fake birthday and name in Sweden, in Ecuador — where he claimed his father resides — and Panama this year.

He said he had originally hoped to go to New York and then move around the country.

Ebbadi was immediately placed into isolation and was referred for an interview with the Tactical Terrorism Response Team (TTRT) for making “terroristic threats to personnel.”

Internal documents show he was marked for deportation from the US, although it was not clear which country he would be returned to.

Border agents recorded 98 encounters of terror watchlisted individuals at both the northern and southern borders in fiscal year 2022, an almost twice as many, 172, in the 2023 fiscal year which ends September 20. So far in the first four months of 2024, 59 people have been apprehended, according to federal data.

The total number of terror watchlisted encounters between fiscal years 2017 and 2021 amounted to just 30 people, but after that time the criteria for being on the list, which has never been disclosed, was expanded.

https://nypost.com/2024/03/17/us-news/illegal-migrant-from-lebanon-admitted-terror-ties/#
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,897
22,272
113
You're such a Hamas parrot.

Do you really think it appropriate to trade people taken hostage for being Jewish for people who have been convicted of serious crimes in a real court system?

Or you could just start calling for Hamas to release their hostages now as demanded by everyone and allowing aid to actually help people.
You are such a hasbara troll.
Do you really think the thousands of Palestinians being held in 'administrative detention' are convicted of anything
Do you really believe that the military courts with a 99% conviction rate are legit?

Its time to end zionism entirely.
Its reached its natural conclusion, genocide.

Give everyone there the vote and let it be democratic for once.

 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,897
22,272
113
SA brought the case against Israel so the ICJ can not make a ruling against Hamas on this case.

They said as clearly and decisively as possible that Hamas' use of hostages is illegal, as has the ICC and UN.
Are you saying that all parties must abide by the rulings of the ICC, ICJ and UN?
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts