Who in their right mind sticks their dick into a hole not really knowing what’s on the other side.
This is certainly not even close to being on the same level of a "woman wearing a short skirt is just asking for it" . This is like going to a glory hole and not knowing who could be on the other end. There can be no trust without verification. This teachable moment is on the same level as hobbiests not doing their homework on SPs they find on Leolist and being robbed or extorted. Wilful ignorance for sexual gratification is a really unhealthy way to live.Sexual assault is hilarious???? Really????
Rape/Sexual assault will teach women not to wear short skirts too.
I agree. How disparate are you for a BJ to stick your dick into hole without knowing what was on the other side. And how pissed off are you to push the case through to open court ?It's a gloryhole. Could be a man, a woman, a domesticated animal, a jar of peanut butter, or a guillotine for the penis. Everything in life has consequences. Even a woman wearing a short skirt.
The there is lots of established case law. The judge was correct in her findings. The typical example is people claiming they tested STD free and then have unprotected sex and infect their partner. Guys lying that they put a condom on or poke holes in condoms. Any act/ or omission that takes away a person's right of consent is an offence.No that’s not how it works. This one was a deception regarding identity. And I’m still not sure it’s a legally sound decision
IDENTITY is where the line is.Claiming to be Jewish when arab...this line is tough. What if a bloke claims he's rich? Single? Has a phd? These are qualitatively different than knowing they have an std, or poking holes in condoms as that risks health.
Not sure where the line is.
We are filthy fuckers and have some of the most twisted sex perversions. See fet life as an example.I agree. How disparate are you for a BJ to stick your dick into hole without knowing what was on the other side. And how pissed off are you to push the case through to open court ?
" Ontario Court Justice Cathy Mocha convicted the 33-year-old of two counts of sexual assault, given that the victims had been misled about the identity of their sexual partner. "
I'm curious about the term 'identity' - is just sex orientation or could it extend to common dating questions like 'are you single ?', 'are you Christian?', 'are you a virgin?', 'are you circumcised?', etc.
I once almost got blown by a lady boy when I was very drunk and vulnerable. Can't really say I felt violated though.We are filthy fuckers and have some of the most twisted sex perversions. See fet life as an example.
Desperate is one possibility. Thrill seeker is another. And there's others.
Maybe that person did feel violated and if that person consented to sex with a female and we knew what the sex laws around consent what's the problem?
Identity is a whole argument for the process.
Lol... What about the guy who divorced his wife and won. Apparently she had a ton of plastic surgery and looked completely different when he met her. They had a kid and apparently the kid was ugly, that made him suspicious.
Never lie, and you never have to worry about the line.Claiming to be Jewish when arab...this line is tough. What if a bloke claims he's rich? Single? Has a phd? These are qualitatively different than knowing they have an std, or poking holes in condoms as that risks health.
Not sure where the line is.
Rape by deception seems to be a slippery slope. Men lying or exaggerating to get pussy is an every day thing.Claiming to be Jewish when arab...this line is tough. What if a bloke claims he's rich? Single? Has a phd? These are qualitatively different than knowing they have an std, or poking holes in condoms as that risks health.
Not sure where the line is.
Right! I have $1000 for the first person to chime in that has never lied.Never lie, and you never have to worry about the line.
They got scammed.. they swerent forced or held against their will..they just didn't like where their dick went after the fact....I get what you guys think is funny, but you are laughing that someone got tricked into being sexually assaulted. Sorry but I just think that is wrong on so many levels.
If a guy sticks his cock through a glory hole to get anonymous sexual satisfaction then it is more than a leap of faith, legal arguments notwithstanding. This sounds more like a civil case.No that’s not how it works. This one was a deception regarding identity. And I’m still not sure it’s a legally sound decision