INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE: LATEST
- Thread starter niniveh
- Start date
A war crime is a war crime is a war crime. There is no ranking system.
You are the one who keeps trying to rank them. You were saying that war crimes against Gaza are more important than the ones against Israel as an ignorant way to say we shouldn't talk about Oct.7. It's irrelevant because it's not the worst. Balderdash.
Maybe you can show us the current standings of the International War Crime Ranking System. Please provide the link.
Wrong again.
Genocide is the worst crime against humanity possible.
It doesn't get more evil or racist that being genocidal.
There is no ranking system.
BTW, a genocide is a war crime. How can it be more serious than a war crime?
Is that more doublespeak from you or just a display of you lack of logic? Your choice.
LOL. You are too funny. What's on special today? This is more of your gaslighting doublespeak. It's not quite as good as "the ICJ did not tell Israel to stop, which means that the ICJ did tell Israel to stop." That one's my favourite. And you have the nerve to say that you've never engaged in doublespeak?
Here's news for you. Every crime has a specific definition. EVERYWHERE. D'uh. Jaywalking has a specific definition. Does that prove that jaywalking a war crime because it has a specific definition? Your arguments are getting dumber and dumber.
Can you list the ranking order of war crimes from least severe to most severe as ranked by the UN? If a ranking system has been put in place, please show us the list.
You can have your own opinions (as wrong as they are) but please stop the bullshitting.
A ranking system? LOLOLOLOLOL. Now I've heard it all. Hahahahaha.
That's like arguing parking tickets are as bad as murder.
Genocide is the most evil crime humans can do to other humans.
Evidently you couldn't follow the discussion.That's like arguing parking tickets are as bad as murder.
Genocide is the most evil crime humans can do to other humans.
Simply your biased opinion. The ICJ does not share the same opinion.
Your biased opinion.
I knew that you were talking out of your biased ass. There is no ranking system.
Too bad that Israel has not been found guilty of genocide.
You won't read the ICJ ruling.
Your biased opinion is based on a Dunning Kruger intellect.
Just stop posting until you read the ruling.
Correct. They did not say to "stop" genocide. That means that they have not "committed" genocide.
Because it's your opinion proves nothing. You also claimed that there was a "ranking system" and when push came to shove was your ranking system was "genocide and everything else". Let's only focus on genocide because anything else is irrelevant. Every war crime needs to be addressed. They are all evil.
Such compelling proof you provide.
Its been out two weeks and you haven't read it yet.
To try to ensure that the possibility would not actually occur. Which is very different than saying it had occurred.
Then why didn't the ICJ clearly say to STOP THE GENOCIDE the same way they clearly told Hamas to RETURN THE HOSTAGES? There's a big inconsistency here that a court like the ICJ would not allow to happen. Or are you smarter than they?
Of course it it, Mr. Doublespeak.
That is most definitely not what I said.
So one random example creates a universal truth?
All war crimes are heinous. As far as which is worst is simply your own opinion, your own ranking system. And what does it accomplish anyways?
So? Drunk driving is specifically defined and measures are in place to prevent that? Does that make it a war crime?
So where is the rest of the list? I've asked several times to show us their ranking list. Which war crime is 1st, then 2nd, then 3rd etc., etc. Where has the UN listed that? There's no ranking system, just your opinion.....once again.
Ahh, so criminal law does have an actual ranking list. All I'm asking is for you to produce that same type of ranking list from the UN. What's 1st, what's, 2nd etc., etc.....?
The jokes on you. Every one of your posts was rebutted, and logically. (BTW, I'll admit that some didn't actually require logic, just the truth.) All you have is your opinion, which you've admitted is biased because you hate Jews.So again, you are not applying your advanced degree in logic here. Or may be you never graduated. You are just pretzeling yourself over and over.
BTW, you love misquoting me. I never said that I a degree in logic, let alone an advanced one. Why can you not quote me properly instead of lying? I said that I took a 4th year level course at UofT and had the top grade in the class at 97%. That is more than enough to prove that I have a more advanced understanding of the topic itself than you and that I am able to think logically, more logically than you. (Waiting for you to call me a liar about the grade.
)Even valcazar now says its the provisional measures which are the orders Israel must abide.
You are just clueless.
The ICJ ordered Israel to prevent killing Palestinians in Gaza.
That would stop the genocide.
Israel is not abiding.
This is a direct quote.
Order of 26 January 2024
THE COURT,
Indicates the following provisional measures: (1) By fifteen votes to two,
The State of Israel shall, in accordance with its obligations under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, in relation to Palestinians in Gaza, take all measures within its power to prevent the commission of all acts within the scope of Article II of this Convention, in particular:
(a) killing members of the group;
If they agreed with you, they'd have told Israel to STOP THE GENOCIDE the same way they told Hamas to RETURN THE HOSTAGES. There was no such statement. Only your racist opinion.
Doublespeak.
They did not absolve Israel of promoting bestiality either. By your Bizarro logic, that proves the ICJ said Israel is promoting bestiality.
Your biased opinion. Why is this so important to you to categorize one particular war crime is "the worst"? What point are you trying to make?
All war crimes are heinous. Do you disagree?
More idiocy and Doublespeak/gaslighting. Drunk driving is not the point. The point is that YOU are the one who claimed that having a definition and means of prevention was proof of a war crime. I pointed out that the same parameters apply to drunk driving which, we agree, is not a war crime. As such your point is moot.
I keep asking for the UN's list. Not your personal, and admittedly biased, opinion. You said that there is a ranking system. Your lack of being able to provide said list proves that you're BSing.
Evidently, I am making points that are over your head. I never equated drunk driving and genocide. The point is that even though they are so far apart from each other, the points that you tried to use to prove that genocide is the "worst" war crime also apply to drunk driving. As such, your point has no merit.
I predicted that you said I was lying. And now you are questioning UofT's credentials as a world class institution. You are grasping at straws if that's the thrust of your claims. Desperate.
I agree with those provisional orders. None of them say that "Israel must stop genocide."
Does Valcazar say that Hamas does not have to obey the order for Hamas to return the hostages?
